| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he did not terminate his participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
APPLICANT STATES: That her husband served over 38 years in the military. She contends that she did not know or understand when she signed the DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) that she would not be eligible for survivor benefits if something happened to her husband. She contends that her husband told her to sign the form which she did without reading or understanding what it meant. She further contends that she did not realize that she had signed such a form until the Office of the Adjutant General obtained a copy from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. In support of her application, she submits a letter of support, dated 11 January 2003, from her son; a death certificate; the FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay letter, dated 18 July 1975; the FSM's Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement; the FSM's NGB [National Guard Bureau] Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); and the FSM's DD Form 2656-2.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records show:
The FSM was born on 6 September 1936. He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 21 September 1952 and was honorably discharged on 23 May 1992.
The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was prepared on 18 July 1975.
On 25 August 1979, the FSM enrolled in the Reserve Component SBP for spouse and children coverage.
He was placed on the retired list effective 6 September 1996.
On 20 April 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2. The applicant signed section IV, acknowledging that she read and understood the disadvantages and advantages of the FSM’s decision to terminate the SBP, that she understood that she would receive no SBP benefits upon the death of the FSM, and that she concurred with the FSM’s decision to terminate his participation in the SBP. The FSM had signed section III, acknowledging that he read and understood the disadvantages and advantages of his decision to terminate the SBP, that SBP coverage would discontinue on the first day of the month following the month his request was received, and that no SBP benefits would be paid upon his death.
On 26 August 2002, the FSM died.
Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.
Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP. Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll. The spouse’s concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The evidence of record shows, and the applicant agrees, that she signed DD Form 2656-2 concurring with the FSM’s decision to terminate his participation in the SBP.
2. The Board understands the FSM asked her to sign the DD Form 2656-2; however, the title of the DD Form 2656-2 is very clear – Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request. The short section she was supposed to read before she signed the form was also very clear – she would receive no SBP benefits upon the death of the FSM.
3. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
RJW____ LDS____ MJT____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088687 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031028 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015885C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he did not request termination of his participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The applicant provides a DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request); a letter dated 7 July 2000; a Statement of Intent dated 6 November 1978; a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) dated 26 September 1981; a Summary of Retired Pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02793
Furthermore, Section V of the DD Form 2656-2 clearly instructed members to have their spouses’ signature notarized if not signed in front of an SBP counselor prior to submitting the form. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: It is evident to her that the DD Form 2656-2 was not completed properly due to a discrepancy between the date of their signatures and the date it was notarized. In their previous advisory, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540
The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015446
However, the applicants signature is distinctly different from other documents she signed which are contained in the FSMs military records (for example, an Army Emergency Relief Fund document). While the Boards staff does not employ a handwriting analyst, it is apparent by the similarity of the writing in the applicants and the FSMs signature on the SBP termination forms, the difference in the applicants signature on the SBP termination form to other documents she signed in the FSMs...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012843
The applicant provides a DD Form 2656-2, dated 19 January 2007, which shows the FSM elected to terminate the SBP. Section IV (Spouse Concurrence) of this form shows a signature of the applicant's same name concurring with the FSM's election. The ABCMR does not investigate cases, but relies upon the evidence in the FSM's record and that provided by applicants.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013449
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, L.M.J., the widow and second wife of a deceased retired former service member (FSM), requests reimbursement of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums that were paid and any necessary corrections that are required to the FSM's records. The response stated: a. the FSM elected to participate in the SBP on 1 October 1973 and elected spouse and child coverage; b. SBP premiums were deducted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003257
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a retired former service member (FSM), be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 2656 which shows this form was signed and dated by her, the FSM, and a witness on 24 March 2001 during the FSM's retirement processing. The applicant and the letters from two retired service members state that if the FSM and the applicant had been adequately...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588
The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage. On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid; b. showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003512
BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015270
He states that he and the former service member (FSM) lived together as husband and wife for 3 years prior to the date of their marriage. By letter, AR-PERSCOM, Transition and Separations Branch notified the applicant that he was not eligible for the FSMs SBP annuity because he and the FSM were not married for one full year before the FSMs date of death. Public records show the applicant and the FSM were married on 26 February 2009.