Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007588
Original file (20100007588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007588 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he remained enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage and that she be paid the SBP annuity.

2.  The applicant states upon the FSM's retirement on 30 November 1996 he elected SBP coverage.  She adds after his retirement they lived in Germany until February 1999 when he returned to Oklahoma to visit relatives.  After the FSM's returned to Germany they were experiencing marital difficulties and were separated in March 2000.  The applicant states the FSM returned to Oklahoma and she remained in Germany, but they were never divorced.  The applicant offers the FSM died in a car accident on 28 July 2009.  After being appointed a representative by the Retirement Services Officer in Schweinfurt, Germany, the representative informed her that the FSM had terminated SBP.

3.  The applicant denies signing any form concurring with the FSM's request to terminate SBP coverage and insists that the signature on the copy of the DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) is not her signature.  She adds she was not in Oklahoma during the time the form was completed or at any time after the FSM returned to Oklahoma.  The applicant concludes she realizes that before she can receive SBP, she must pay back premiums and she agrees to forfeit SBP annuity payments until the premiums are paid.

4.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* a self-authored letter to this Board, dated 24 November 2009
* a copy of DD Form 2656-2
* a copy of the FSM's DFAS-CL 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement)
* a copy of an email, dated 10 November 2009
* a copy of her Marriage Certificate
* the FSM's State of Oklahoma Certificate of Death
* a copy of her DD Form 1173 (U.S. Uniformed Services Identification Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 20 January 1984, the applicant and FSM were married.

2.  The FSM served on active duty until being retired on 30 November 1996 by reason of sufficient service for retirement in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

3.  During his retirement processing, the FSM completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) in which he elected full “Spouse Only” SBP coverage with the applicant being named as the beneficiary.

4.  On 2 March 1999, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656-2 in which he elected to terminate SBP.  This form contains the supposed applicant's concurrence with her signature.  Additionally, Item 6 (Witness) of this form states that "By my signature, I certify that the above named spouse/former spouse signed this form in my presence and that the above named spouse/former spouse produced a photo bearing identification document which identified him/her as the person signing this SBP Termination Request."  The witness is listed as P---- S--- and contains her signature, title as the notary, and a notary seal.

5.  The FSM's DFAS-CL 7220/148, effective 14 July 2009, shows under the SBP coverage section the entry "SBP Coverage Type:  Discontinued Participation."

6.  On 29 July 2009, the FSM died.  Information contained on the FSM's Certificate of Death shows that his sister, P---- S---, was the informant.  The FSM's sister was also listed as the notary on the DD Form 2656-2.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.

8.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  Members retired for more than two years as of 17 May 1998 were authorized a one-year opportunity (17 May 1998 through 16 May 1999) to disenroll.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant maintains she never signed the DD Form 2656-2 concurring with the FSM's request to termination SBP.  It is noted that the applicant's signature on this form does not appear to be the same signature listed on her application to the Board.  A review of the DD Form 2656-2 shows it was notarized by the FSM's sister.  The fact that the FSM's sister signed and notarized this form, although not illegal, presents a conflict of interest.

2.  In view of the facts in this case, the FSM's sister should have disqualified herself from notarizing a document from an immediate family member (her brother, the FSM).  Therefore, in the interest of equity, it would be appropriate to show that the applicant did not concur with the FSM's request to terminate SBP; thereby reinstating SBP, full coverage, for spouse only.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  showing the FSM's DD Form 2656-2, dated 2 March 1999 was invalid;

   b.  showing the FSM's continued enrollment in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage; and
   
c.  paying the applicant the SBP annuity retroactive to the FSM's death, less any SBP premium costs due.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007588



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                       

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004221

    Original file (20130004221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to a DA Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) being submitted to DFAS, it was altered with whiteout to show the FSM declined to make a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election until age 60 instead of it showing he elected an immediate annuity with spouse-only coverage. Evidence of record shows that the FSM completed a DA Form 2656-5 and elected not to participate in spousal RCSBP coverage and that his spouse concurred with the election on 1 June 2007. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009918

    Original file (20100009918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she elected not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premium payments were withdrawn from her first retirement pay statement. She states when she initially completed the form electing to decline SBP coverage, there were no instructions stating that signatures on the form must be notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004993

    Original file (20120004993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse and children based on his full retired pay vice a reduced amount. b. SBP Spouse Concurrence Statement, dated 8 September 1999, wherein it stated the FSM elected SBP coverage for spouse and children with a base amount of $462.00, which was less than full retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019518

    Original file (20100019518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019518 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 2656-2 indicating that on 20 April 1999 the FSM requested to terminate participation in the SBP. The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be corrected to void a DD Form 2656-2 and to reinstate SBP benefits because her signature was forged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007522

    Original file (20100007522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the DD Form 2656 that he completed on 27 October 2009 where he declined SBP spouse coverage should be honored and the SBP premiums refunded because both he and his spouse were present when he signed the document in the presence of an Army SBP counselor and notary public, respectively. The evidence of record confirms that on 27 October 2009, in his application for retired pay, the applicant declined to participate in SBP. The evidence shows that, for some period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001340

    Original file (20090001340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show his spouse concurred with his election made on 27 October 2008, not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), by showing that date in block 32b (Date Signed). As for the applicant's request for an expedited refund of the costs of the SBP already deducted from his retired pay account, the ABCMR only corrects military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018086

    Original file (20130018086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of her SBP premium bill from DFAS and DD Forms 2656, dated 20 and 27 August 2013. On 20 August 2013, the applicant's spouse signed a DD Form 2656 indicating his concurrence with the applicant's election not to participate in the SBP. On 27 August 2013, the applicant's spouse signed a second notarized DD Form 2656 indicating his concurrence with the applicant's election not to participate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016366

    Original file (20100016366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that subsequent to receiving her 20-year letter, the applicant elected Option A wherein she declined enrollment at that time and deferred her SBP election to age 60. The evidence of record shows she retired on 6 May 2010, at age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 on 30 March 2010 electing not to participate in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000267

    Original file (20120000267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    State of Delaware, Marriage License and Certificate of Marriage, that shows the applicant and Dannette Michelle B---- were married on 20 October 2001; b. DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) that shows: * the applicant requested to discontinue participation in the SBP * his spouse acknowledged her understanding of the disadvantages of the decision and provided her concurrence * the applicant, his spouse, and a witness signed the form on 29 December 2011 c. notarized statement by Dannette...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02793

    Original file (BC-2005-02793.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, Section V of the DD Form 2656-2 clearly instructed members to have their spouses’ signature notarized if not signed in front of an SBP counselor prior to submitting the form. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: It is evident to her that the DD Form 2656-2 was not completed properly due to a discrepancy between the date of their signatures and the date it was notarized. In their previous advisory, dated...