| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam on 1 March 1965 when a machine gun exploded as he was returning fire on the enemy from a UH-1B helicopter. He further states that he served two tours in Vietnam and was wounded more than once; however, this is the only injury that was recorded in records. In support of his application he submits a copy of a clinical record (DA Form 8-275-3) indicating that he was treated for wounds to the left thigh and leg that was caused when a gun blew up while he was firing as a gunner on an armed UH-1B on 1 March 1965. He was hospitalized for 6 days and returned to duty.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on 8 October 1963 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed his training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and was transferred to Hawaii on 29 March 1964. He was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry Regiment for duty as a light weapons infantryman. He remained in Hawaii until he was transferred to Vietnam for attachment to the 119th Aviation Company on 23 February 1965.
5. On 1 March 1965, the applicant was treated at the 94th Medical Detachment for a penetrating wound to the left thigh and lacerations to the left leg, that were a result of a gun exploding while being fired from a UH-1B helicopter. The applicant was designated as a gunner on the helicopter.
6. The applicant's unit transferred from Hawaii to Vietnam on 13 June 1965. He rejoined his unit and remained in Vietnam until 24 September 1966, when he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California.
7. He underwent a separation physical examination on 25 September 1966 and the physician noted that the applicant had sustained a gun shot wound to the left leg.
8. On 25 September 1966, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an early overseas returnee. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 18 days of total active service and at the time of his REFRAD his report of separation (DD Form 214) was prepared to reflect that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the Air Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. There is no indication that he was ever awarded the Purple Heart and he is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Listing. All of his conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service were excellent.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile enemy action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
10. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for the period he was assigned. Additionally, he participated in three campaigns, which entitles him to three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded AFEM.
11. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, also established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board is convinced by the evidence submitted with his application that he was in fact wounded in action with the enemy on Vietnam on 1 March 1965, while serving in the rank of private first class (PFC) and that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to correct this error at this time.
2. Additionally, the Board finds that he is also entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the VUA and three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded AFEM.
3. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 8 October 1963 through 25 September 1966. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
4. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against the enemy in Vietnam on 1 March 1965, while serving in the rank of PFC.
b. by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the VUA and three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded AFEM; and
c. by awarding him the AGCM for his service during the period of 8 October 1963 through 25 September 1966.
BOARD VOTE:
__jm____ __sk ____ __cjp____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_____Stanley Kelley_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003088374 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 2. 79 | 107.0033/VUA |
| 3. 140 | 107.0095/RVNGC |
| 4. 102 | 107.0056/AGCM |
| 5. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091574C070212
The applicant states that he received three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam; however, none of them are entered on his DD Form 214. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080348C070215
The Board finds that the evidence of record establishes that he was injured in combat in Vietnam on 4 September 1970 and that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for that injury at this time. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 6 August 1969 through 5 August 1971. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074809C070403
However, his records do contain orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) on 13 June 1968, which was not recorded on his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD. While the applicant’s records do not contain a copy of the orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his records clearly contain information showing that he was wounded in combat on 14 May 1967 and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083341C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received in Vietnam on 9 January 1968. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068780C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant’s separation medical examination indicates that the applicant sustained injuries in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was wounded or injured in Vietnam during an action by enemy forces. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068800C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He further states that when he departed Vietnam he was told that he was being recommended for awards of the BSM and CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057243C070420
There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 26 March 1969 while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s separation from active duty, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be corrected to include these awards at this time. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078323C070215
In support of his application he submits statements from the company executive officer (a Retired colonel) and two former members of his unit who were present when he was wounded and a copy of the orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Accordingly, the Board must presume that given the circumstances surrounding the attack, the large number of soldiers killed and wounded and the confusion that followed thereafter, that because the applicant was returned to duty after medical...