Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085652C070212
Original file (2003085652C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 5 August 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003085652

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That 17 weeks of his enlistment contract be voided and that his expiration of term of service (ETS) be changed to 21 June 2003.

APPLICANT STATES: That upon entering the Army, he was recruited for assignment to The Old Guard (TOG) and in doing so, was told that his Ranger contract was forfeited. Therefore, he requests that the 17 weeks added to his contract for Ranger Training be voided. He further states that Army Regulation 601-210 provides the standards and requirements for enlistment in Program 9-B (Ranger Training Option) and it does not provide instructions to extend an enlistment contract. Accordingly, he desires his expiration of term of service be changed to 21 June 2003.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in Albany, New York, on 21 June 2001, for a period of 3 years and 17 weeks, training in the Infantry Career Management Field (CMF), Airborne training, Ranger training and a cash enlistment bonus. At the time of his enlistment he acknowledged that he understood that he had volunteered to attend airborne and Ranger training before he could be assigned to a Ranger unit and that failure to do so would result in disqualification of that option.

The applicant completed his basic, advanced and airborne training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and based on his voluntarily waiving his Ranger training, was reassigned to the 3rd Infantry Regiment (TOG) at Fort Myer, Virginia.

In the processing of this application an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Retention Management Division, which opined, in effect, that Army Regulation 601-210, Table 9-3, provides that persons who waive their enlistment options are required to complete the term of service for which they enlisted. The opinion was forwarded to the applicant for a response and to date he has failed to do so.

Army Regulation 601-210 governs eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army. It provides, in pertinent part (table 9-3, line 6), that applicant's who elect to waive their enlistment option are required to complete the term of service for which they enlisted.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:



1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. By the applicant's own admission, he was informed at the time that he volunteered for assignment to The Old Guard, that he would forfeit his Ranger Training enlistment option if accepted to assignment to The Old Guard and such was the case. However, in doing so, it does not negate the period of his enlistment.

3. The Board finds that he was properly informed at the time that he would not attend the Ranger course and would have to waive that portion of his contract if he volunteered for the assignment. The Board finds no evidence to suggest that he was mislead or was lead to believe that the period of his enlistment would be reduced as a result of his not attending the Ranger course.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___ls____ __rw____ ___gw___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003085652
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/05
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 225 112.0300/TERM OF ENL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077542C070215

    Original file (2002077542C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his enlistment contract be reduced by 17 weeks. The applicant states that he signed an enlistment contract for a cash bonus and ranger training. The applicant's request is fully supported by the evidence of record and the PERSCOM’s advisory opinion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022451

    Original file (20120022451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) * DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Option – U.S. Army Delayed Entry Program (DEP)) * DA Form 3286-60 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Options) * DA Form 3286-61 (Statement of Understanding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014112

    Original file (20070014112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) debt be waived. In paragraph 5a of the applicant’s ROTC contract, he acknowledged that, under the terms of this contract, the Secretary of the Army could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier, if he was qualified, for a period of not more than four years if he failed to complete the ROTC program. On 6 June 2005, the applicant signed a Senior ROTC Contract Agreement, Special Active Duty Provision, Statement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000853C070208

    Original file (20040000853C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    One of the applicant's original enlistment documents, a printout headed "RAGET" (acronym unknown), indicated he would enlist for 6 years at an advanced rank (the rank not listed) by reason of the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP) for an enlisted job of 63G1O00YY with only one enlistment option – station of choice, Europe. This document indicated the applicant would enlist in the Regular Army for a period of 6 years and 00 weeks for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005940C070206

    Original file (20050005940C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant has any other loans that did qualify for payment under the provisions of the SLRP. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment – US Army Enlistment Program was amended to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000589

    Original file (20150000589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 5 (Terms of Disenrollment) of the applicant's DA Form 597-3 states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080008120

    Original file (AR20080008120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He also asks that his 2007 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his combat and other service awards as well as his complete military training. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designated Codes), Table 2-3, states that the SPD code of JKK denotes involuntary discharge by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059484C070421

    Original file (2001059484C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of release or discharge from active duty), block 6 (Reserve Obligation Term Date), be corrected to reflect his Reserve Obligation Term Date. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083778C070212

    Original file (2003083778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015223

    Original file (20090015223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states her contract does not show prior active/inactive military service. In this case, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was misinformed during the preparation of her enlistment contract, which resulted in an incorrect term of service being shown on her DD Form 4/1. Evidence of record shows prior to the applicant's enlistment on 18 July 2008, she served 4 months and 15 days ADT and 4 years, 11 months, and 10 days of inactive military service in the VAARNG.