Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083778C070212
Original file (2003083778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003083778

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Maria C. Sanchez Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his enlistment contract be corrected to reflect he enlisted for the period of 2 years.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he enlisted for 6 years in order to be enrolled in the Army College Fund (ACF); however, he has since discovered that the minimum requirement to serve is for 2 years of active duty.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 1 May 2002 in San Diego, California under the delayed entry program. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 September 2002 for a period of 6 years, training as a multiple launch rocket system repairer (MOS 27M) under incentives 9A (US Army Training Enlistment Program) and 9C (US Army Incentive Enlistment Program – Army College Fund).
He also indicated by his initials at the time on a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Program) that he understood he was enlisting for the Army College Fund (ACF) education incentive for the amount of $50,000. In addition, he further indicated that no other promises had been made that were not annotated on his contract.

In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) Retention Management Division which opined that there was no evidence in his records to support his claim and that the applicant enlisted in two incentive programs (9A and 9C) for the period of 6 years, the minimum number of years required for this option. The applicant initialed and signed several forms including DA Form 3286-66 understanding the amount of incentive and required term of enlistment of 6 years. Additionally, the applicant acknowledged that if he does not fulfill his initial enlistment, he could forfeit his ACF benefits.

The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment and no response has been received by the Board as of this date.

Army Regulation 601-210 sets forth the basic authority for the Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program. Chapter 9, of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, the basic eligibility criteria for all applicants enlisting under Enlistment Programs and Options. Table 9-4, Program 9C, US Army Incentive Enlistment Program – ACF states that soldiers who fail to complete their initial term of enlistment in the MOS which offered the ACF will forfeit entitlement to all benefits provided by the ACF, unless discharged for service connected disability, hardship, or convenience of the Government. If discharged for the convenience of the Government, the minimum time must have been served, 30 months for terms 3 years or longer.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the actions taken by the Army in his case were correct. The applicant has been afforded an opportunity to provide additional evidence to the Board to support his contentions and has failed to do so. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must presume that the applicant read and understood what he was signing at the time and that what the Department did at the time was in accordance with applicable regulations.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jhk ___ ___rks___ ___jm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003083778
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/07/17
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 222 112.0000/enlistment contract
2. 225 112.0300/term of enlistment
3. 1018 103.0100/ACF
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010209C070208

    Original file (20040010209C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Form 3286- 59 (Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program) states the applicant is enlisting under program 9A Army Training Enlistment Program and 9C Army Incentive Enlistment Program (ACF $26,500.00) and (Cash Bonus $8,000.00). The applicant's enlistment documents state that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $26,500." The advisory opinions admit that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009223

    Original file (20120009223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he enlisted for the Army College Fund (ACF) option. d. He contacted the VA regarding his ACF benefit and was told that a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding - U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program) was required. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DEP-OUT annex form the entry: "Request Option 744, USA Incentive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013190

    Original file (20090013190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid $30,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $30,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002110C071108

    Original file (20060002110C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dale E. DeBruler | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program); DA Form 3286-59 (Statement of Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program), and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $40,000.00...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007186C071108

    Original file (20060007186C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dale E. DeBruler | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 13 October 2006, the Education Incentives Branch, USAHRC confirmed the ACF portion of the applicant's MGIB entitlement should have been reflected as $4,200.00 (or $116.67 in 36 equal installments). USAREC message 98-080, dated 12 November 1998, clarified that the amount reflected was to be the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014119C071108

    Original file (20060014119C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a states that he was enlisting for, in addition to the 9B, the U. S. Army Station/Unit/Command/Area Enlistment Program and 9c, the U. S. Army College Fund. On 27 March 2007, the Education Incentives Branch, USAHRC confirmed the ACF portion of the applicant's MGIB entitlement should have been reflected as $2,600.00 (or $72.22 in 36 equal installments). U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) message 98-080, dated 12 November 1998, increased the total amounts of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002997

    Original file (20090002997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid $33,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $33,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004936

    Original file (20090004936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid $33,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $33,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004452

    Original file (20090004452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid $40,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $40,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001358

    Original file (20090001358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be paid $40,000.00 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence, "If ACF benefits in the amount of $40,000.00 (exclusive of MGIB benefits) were authorized by the official processing you for enlistment and the Government fails to pay the full amount under the appropriate provisions and such failure results in...