Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085252C070212
Original file (2003085252C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF: .
        

         BOARD DATE: 17 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003085252

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3 be changed to RE-1.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his RE-3 code is incorrect because he was honorably discharged by reason of expiration term of service (ETS). In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), discharge orders from the United States Army Reserve (USAR), and an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the USAR.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 29 July 1987, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Army for four years. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 51M (Firefighter). The record also shows that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/E-4 (SP/E-4).

The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the assignment of the applicant’s RE-3 code at separation are not on file. However, his record does contain a properly constituted separation document that was authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his separation.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 confirms that he was honorably released from active duty on 28 July 1991, after completing a total of four years of active military service. It also verifies that the authority for his discharge was chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, and that the narrative reason for his separation was ETS. The DD Form 214 also shows that the applicant was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of LBK and an RE code of 3.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service personnel. That chapter included a list of armed forces RE codes. RE-3 applied to persons who is not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation but, the disqualification is waivable.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of LBK is assigned to soldiers who are separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 at ETS when they are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment.
DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that his RE-3 code should be changed because he was honorably discharged at his ETS. However, the Boards finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to support this claim.

2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was honorably released from active duty at his ETS and that he was assigned an RE-3 code. The record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding this RE code assignment. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 that contained the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge and the corresponding SPD and RE code assignments.

3. The evidence also confirms that the applicant authenticated this document with his signature on the date of his separation, thereby verifying that the information contained therein was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued. Thus, the Board presumes government regularity in the applicant’s separation processing and concludes that his separation, to include the RE code assignment, was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations.

4. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the applicant’s rights were fully protected throughout his separation processing. Therefore, the Board concludes that there is insufficient evidence to support a change to the RE-3 code assigned the applicant at separation, and that the code was and is still applicable.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ _______ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RKS__ __JM___ __JHL _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003085252
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403

    Original file (2002072438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067961C070402

    Original file (2002067961C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served on active duty for 3 years, from 15 July 1980 through 14 July 1983. The records available to the Board are incomplete and were provided by the applicant. The evidence does show that the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation assigned him a SPD code of LBK, which indicates an involuntary separation and by regulation mandated a reentry code of RE-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022241

    Original file (20100022241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was enrolled in the Army Weight Control Program (AWCP) and met his weight standard on 4 August 2005 in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-9 (AWCP). The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 5500-R (Body Fat Content Worksheet - Male), DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091429C070212

    Original file (2003091429C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The SPD code of LBK is assigned to soldiers who are separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, completion of required active service when they are ineligible for, barred from, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051648C070420

    Original file (2001051648C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was barred from reenlistment at the time of his separation and that the assignment of his SPD and RE codes were accomplished in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004088

    Original file (20130004088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows in: * item 25 (Separation Authority) – "AR 635-200, PARA 5-15A (2)" * item 26 (Separation Code) – "LGH" * item 27 (RE Code) – "3" * item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "NON-RETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY" 6. This SPD code is used for RA Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who are separated on completion of enlistment. The applicant was an RA Soldier who was released from active duty upon reaching his ETS, but his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063814C070421

    Original file (2001063814C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded: However, by regulation, members separating at the completion of their required active service who are ineligible to reenlist are assigned a SPD code of LBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3. The evidence of record confirms that at the time of his separation, the applicant had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063624C070421

    Original file (2001063624C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an RE Code of “RE 3” with a corresponding SPD code of “LBK.” The Board notes that under Army Regulation 635-5-1, the SPD code for voluntary REFRAD or transfer to the USAR is “MBK” with a corresponding RE code of “RE 1 or 3.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011362

    Original file (20140011362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his current legal name and correction of the separation and reentry eligibility (RE) codes on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). At the time, his name was recorded in his records as "S____, D____ A____." The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect his correct name (as he was then known) throughout the course of the entire period of his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018727

    Original file (20110018727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: * USAR Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) Physical Review Board Standard Form 507 (Clinical Record) * Physical Review Board clinical records * Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) reverse and continuation sheet CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation...