Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051648C070420
Original file (2001051648C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 8 February 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001051648

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. JoAnn H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. George D. Paxson Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his Separation Program Designator (SPD)and Reentry (RE) codes contained on his Department of Defense (DD) Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed and upgraded.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he received an improper SPD code based on traffic felonies that he did not commit while on active duty and this resulted in his receiving an inappropriate RE code.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 18 November 1983 and served for three years until being honorably discharged, by reason of expiration of term of service (ETS), on 17 November 1986.

The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a copy of a Department of the Army (DA) Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), which was approved on 7 April 1986. This document confirms that the bar to reenlistment was imposed on the applicant based on his record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP), non payment of just debts, and an off post arrest for driving without insurance.

The DA 4126-R indicates the applicant accepted NJP on two separate occasions for disobeying lawful orders and that he had not paid his just debt, a furniture bill twice, on 23 July 1985 and 1 September 1986. It also confirms that he was arrested for driving without insurance on 9 November 1985 and he had been detained for defective taillights on 7 and 20 February 1985.

The MPRJ contains a copy of a valid DD Form 214 completed on the applicant at on the date of his separation, 17 November 1986. This document confirms that the authority for his separation was chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 and that the reason for his separation was ETS. It also confirms that he was assigned an SPD code of LBK and an RE code of 3.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of LBK was the appropriate code for the applicant based on this regulatory guidance for soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 4, for ETS who was ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who is separated at the completion of their enlistment. Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation (Separation Documents) establishes
RE Code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to soldiers separated for this reason.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board noted the applicant’s contention, however, after a careful evaluation of the evidence of record and the independent evidence submitted by the applicant, the Board finds this claim lacks merit.

2. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was barred from reenlistment at the time of his separation and that the assignment of his SPD and RE codes were accomplished in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jhl____ ___gp___ ___dh___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001051648
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2001/02/08
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1986/11/17
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C4
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 4 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014451C070206

    Original file (20050014451C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain a copy of DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), which shows that he was present for duty (PDY) after being confined by civil authorities (CCA) effective 25 December 1986. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068166C070402

    Original file (2002068166C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his correct social security number (SSN); that his rank be changed to specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4); and that his reentry (RE) code be upgraded. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSN contained in the applicant’s 25 April 1985...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079939C070215

    Original file (2002079939C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation shows that he was assigned a SPD code of LBK and an RE code of RE-3. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was barred from reenlistment at the time of his REFRAD and that his separation processing, to include the SPD and RE code assignments, was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403

    Original file (2002072438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067961C070402

    Original file (2002067961C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served on active duty for 3 years, from 15 July 1980 through 14 July 1983. The records available to the Board are incomplete and were provided by the applicant. The evidence does show that the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation assigned him a SPD code of LBK, which indicates an involuntary separation and by regulation mandated a reentry code of RE-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001100

    Original file (20090001100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 October 1975 for 3 years. While the applicant did not submit a copy of his DD Form 214 with his application, his records contain copies number 2 and 5 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 27 of copy number 2 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the entry "Para 2-20, AR 601-280 applies"; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002595

    Original file (20140002595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Multinational Force and Observers Medal. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Multinational Force and Observers Medal. His record shows that based on his SPD code, time lost, rank, and length of service there is no evidence of an error in his assigned RE codes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064300C070421

    Original file (2001064300C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD to be used for these stated reasons. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The applicant was involuntarily released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an SPD Code of “LBK” with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011362

    Original file (20140011362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his current legal name and correction of the separation and reentry eligibility (RE) codes on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). At the time, his name was recorded in his records as "S____, D____ A____." The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect his correct name (as he was then known) throughout the course of the entire period of his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084778C070212

    Original file (2003084778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her SPD code is applicable to someone that is barred from reenlisting. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 at Headquarters, Department of the Army advised that the regulation prior to August 1993 did not provide an SPD code for the voluntary discharge or voluntary/involuntary REFRAD of Soldiers under the provisions of chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of ETS; an SPD code was only provided to cover the situation of involuntary discharge of enlisted Soldiers...