Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011362
Original file (20140011362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011362 

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his current legal name and correction of the separation and reentry eligibility (RE) codes on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states his military service records show his name as "D____ A. S____ ."  However, his name was legally changed to "A___ Q____ D____."  He also states the separation code of "LBK" and the RE code of "3" recorded on his DD Form 214 should be changed as they adversely affect his employability.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a court order and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 9 November 1987.  (It also shows his Social Security Number (SSN).)  At the time, his name was recorded in his records as "S____, D____ A____."  The applicant further enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 January 1988 with the same name.  This established his expiration term of service (ETS) as 19 January 1992.

3.  The applicant's military service records consistently show his name as "S____, D____ A____."

4.  A DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), dated 4 October 1990, shows the bar to reenlistment initiated against the applicant was approved by the battalion commander on 23 October 1990.  Then, on 22 March 1991 and on 17 October 1991, the commander reviewed the bar to reenlistment against the applicant and determined it should remain in effect.

5.  Headquarters, 520th Personnel Service Company (Germany), Orders 226-29, dated 20 September 1991, as amended by U.S. Army Transition Point, Fort Jackson, SC, 1st Endorsement, dated 9 December 1991, show the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD) effective 16 January 1992.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 20 January 1988, was honorably REFRAD on 16 January 1992 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, based on ETS, and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.  He had completed 3 years, 11 months, and
27 days of total active service this period.  It also shows in:

* item 1 (Name):  "S____, D____ A____"
* item 18 (Remarks):  "DD Form 214 issued on 920119"
* item 26 (Separation Code):  "LBK"
* item 27 (Reentry Code):  "3"

7.  USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, Orders D-01-613128, dated 
23 January 1996, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 
23 January 1996.  The orders show his name as "S____, D____ A____."

8.  In support of his request the applicant provides the following documents.
   
   a.  Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida, Court Order, that shows the court granted the applicant's petition to change his name from "D____ A____ S____" to "A____ Q____ D____" on 
7 August 2012.
   b.  VA letter, dated 26 December 2013, that provides a summary of the applicant's VA benefits.  It shows the letter replaces VA Form 20-5455 and is considered an official record of his VA entitlement.  It also shows the applicant's current legal name and that his claim is based on his SSN and period of honorable service in the U.S. Army from 20 January 1988 to 16 January 1992.

9.  Army Regulation (AR) 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. 

   a.  It shows the SPD code of "LBK" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service obligation.

   b.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE code of "3" will be assigned to members separated with an SPD code of "LBK."

10.  AR 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the USAR.  Table 3-1 includes a list of the RA RE codes and shows that:

* RE-1 applies to Soldiers who are qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, if all other applicable criteria are met
* RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable

11.  AR 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or REFRAD service or control of the active Army.  It also established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.

	a.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the enlistment documents, enlisted qualification record, separation approval authority documentation, separation orders, or any other document authorized for filing in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

	b.  Paragraph 2-4 contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214.  The instructions show for –

* item 1, enter the name in all capital letters, include "JR", "SR", or "II" when needed
* item 26, enter the proper SPD representing the specific authority for separation
* item 27, see chapters 1 and 2 and appendix D of AR 601-280 for
RE codes to be entered only on copies 2, 4, 7, and 8

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show his current legal name and he should be issued a new DD Form 214 showing his current legal name with SPD and RE codes that will enhance his employability.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect his correct name (as he was then known) throughout the course of the entire period of his military service.  This includes his DD Form 214 when he was REFRAD on 16 January 1992 and his orders when he was discharged from the USAR on 23 January 1996.

3.  The applicant's petition to change his name to "Q____ K____ S____" was granted by court order on 7 August 2012.

4.  Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, the documentation provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in his OMPF.

5.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his current legal name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.  

6.  However, a copy of this Record of Proceedings will be filed in the applicant's OMPF so a record of his current legal name will be available.

7.  Records show the applicant was honorably REFRAD under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service.  

   a.  At the time, an approved bar to reenlistment was in effect, which made him ineligible for reenlistment without removal of the bar to reenlistment or an approved waiver to reenlist.  
   b.  The evidence of record shows RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.

   c.  The evidence of record also shows that the SPD code of "LBK" and the
RE code of "3" were correctly entered on his DD Form 214 in accordance with governing Army regulations.
   
   d.  Thus, the separation and reentry codes that are shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 are appropriate and correct.

8.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011362



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011362



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011161

    Original file (20140011161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his current legal name. The applicant states his military records show his name as "J____ J____ Jr." However, his name was legally changed to "Q___ K____ S____." A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 1 July 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018390

    Original file (20100018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010965

    Original file (20110010965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married surname. Her DD Form 214 shows: a. in item 1 (Name – Last, First, Middle) – "S____, D____ A____" and b. in item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) – the applicant signed the document. As such, the document provided by the applicant is insufficient evidence to warrant a change to the name in her official military service records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063624C070421

    Original file (2001063624C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an RE Code of “RE 3” with a corresponding SPD code of “LBK.” The Board notes that under Army Regulation 635-5-1, the SPD code for voluntary REFRAD or transfer to the USAR is “MBK” with a corresponding RE code of “RE 1 or 3.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084778C070212

    Original file (2003084778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her SPD code is applicable to someone that is barred from reenlisting. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 at Headquarters, Department of the Army advised that the regulation prior to August 1993 did not provide an SPD code for the voluntary discharge or voluntary/involuntary REFRAD of Soldiers under the provisions of chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of ETS; an SPD code was only provided to cover the situation of involuntary discharge of enlisted Soldiers...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064300C070421

    Original file (2001064300C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD to be used for these stated reasons. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The applicant was involuntarily released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 and was issued an SPD Code of “LBK” with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002514

    Original file (20150002514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. Former PVT D____ R____ claimed she was sexually harassed by the applicant's licking and biting of his lips. The evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the finding of guilty of violating Army regulations by wrongfully touching and sexually harassing trainees. On 18 February 2014, the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army, Criminal Law Division, Washington, DC, notified the applicant that: * his record of trial contained sufficient legal and competent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403

    Original file (2002072438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023119

    Original file (20110023119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. For Soldiers separating from the RA, it prescribes eligibility criteria and options for enlistment or transfer into the Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067961C070402

    Original file (2002067961C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served on active duty for 3 years, from 15 July 1980 through 14 July 1983. The records available to the Board are incomplete and were provided by the applicant. The evidence does show that the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation assigned him a SPD code of LBK, which indicates an involuntary separation and by regulation mandated a reentry code of RE-3.