Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084879C070212
Original file (2003084879C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 16 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084879

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his reenlistment in the Army Reserve on 2 April 1979 be voided.

APPLICANT STATES: He was not eligible for military service because he was medically discharged on 24 August 1967, had six children, and had a felony conviction in February 1969. In support of his application, he submitted a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) for enlistment on 2 April 1979 in the U. S. Army Reserve; enlistment orders, dated 2 April 1979; and six birth certificates for his children.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records for his service in the Army of the United States only are available. U. S. Army Reserve records are not available. Information pertaining to that service was obtained from the 2 April 1979 enlistment documents provided by the applicant.

The applicant was inducted into the Army on 8 February 1967. He was assigned to Fort Dix, New Jersey, for basic combat training.

Records show the applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 15 February 1967 to 6 March 1967.

On 19 June 1967, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 7 March 1967 to 9 June 1967 and for breaking restriction. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months and forfeiture of $60.00 for six months.

On 25 July 1967, the applicant was evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and was diagnosed as having an ulcer, duodenum. The MEB determined that he was physically unfit for retention on active duty and recommended that he be separated from military service under the provisions of Chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-40. He was discharged on 24 August 1967 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-20A, due to a physical disability by a medical board with an honorable discharge. He had 4 months and 3 days of total active military service and was issued RE codes of RE-3, 3A, and 3B.

The applicant stated in his letter that he was convicted of manslaughter in Paterson, New Jersey on or about 2 April 1969. He stated that he was sentenced to a 7-year indeterminate sentence, was paroled on 14 December 1970, and was discharged in 1972 after serving 18 months on parole.

The applicant provided a copy of his enlistment contract, dated 2 April 1979.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 7-17, of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a fraudulent entry is the procurement of an enlistment, reenlistment, or period of active service through any deliberate material misrepresentation, omission, or concealment of information which, if known and considered by the Army at the time of enlistment or reenlistment, might have resulted in rejection. This includes all disqualifying information requiring a waiver. A soldier who concealed his or her conviction by civil court of a felonious offense normally will not be considered for retention.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The enlistment contract submitted by the applicant in support of his claim shows he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve on 2 April 1979.

3. The Board notes the applicant's statements regarding his felony conviction on 2 April 1969. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board to show that he actually served in the U. S. Army Reserve. In the absence of such evidence, the Board presumes that his enlistment on 2 April 1979 was voided at the time.

4. Based on the lack of evidence in this case, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

AAO____ HOF_____ MMB____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084879
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20031016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059963C070421

    Original file (2001059963C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075059C070403

    Original file (2002075059C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. At the time of his enlistment, he indicated in item 36 of his enlistment contract (DD Form 1966/5), where it explained to him that failure to reveal any previous records of arrests or convictions or juvenile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014230

    Original file (20110014230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: a. the 2 June 2011 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision was and is a fraud. The applicant provides: * U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey document, dated 14 July 1966 – this document was previously considered by the Board * Two newspaper articles * VA Form 21-4138 (DVA Statement in Support of Claim), dated 28 June 2011 * Letters, dated 15 August 2011, 21 July 2011, 15 July 2011, 24 June 2011, and 24 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021773

    Original file (20100021773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows he was in the custody of the law at the time he was inducted into the Army of United States. Paragraph 5-5b of the same regulation states that an individual claiming erroneous induction because of a procedural right as provided by the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 may submit a request for release from custody and control of the Army. The available evidence shows he was charged with a Selective Service violation on 15 June 1966, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004036C070205

    Original file (20060004036C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He had completed 6 years, 2 months, and 8 days of active military service during the period under review. On 10 September 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), by unanimous vote, denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100831C070208

    Original file (04100831C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was punished in October 1967 for failing to report to duty, resulting in his reduction to pay grade E-1, and in November 1967 for failing to report to duty and for wearing the insignia of a sergeant (E-5) on his uniform. The applicant's combat decorations are noted, however, evidence available to the Board indicates that the applicant's incidents of misconduct were not limited to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053638C070420

    Original file (2001053638C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He did not submit a statement.On an unknown date, the applicant was notified that a board of officers would convene on 10 September 1973 to determine whether he should be discharged due to fraudulent entry under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant knowingly concealed a prior service record and a criminal (felony) conviction, both of which were disqualifying factors.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087029C070212

    Original file (2003087029C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board notes the applicant's contention that he was under extreme stress due to his house being robbed and his wife raped shortly before the incident for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087372C070212

    Original file (2003087372C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004066

    Original file (20070004066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluation shows that the applicant was referred for evaluation prior to elimination under Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations) for unsuitability. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. _____Linda D. Simmons___ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070004066 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED TYPE OF DISCHARGE DATE OF DISCHARGE DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-212 DISCHARGE...