| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the charges for which he was discharged are no longer used as a basis to discharge Army personnel and because he suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) he was unaware that he could apply for an upgrade of his discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted on 28 March 1966 for a period of 3 years and airborne training. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 26 September 1966.
On 3 March 1967, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer (NCO). His punishment consisted of extra duty.
He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 27 June 1967.
On 29 June 1967, NJP was imposed against him for failure to go to his appointed place of duty. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-3.
He was transferred to Vietnam on 18 September 1967 for duty as a supply handler.
On 16 June 1968, NJP was imposed against him for possession of an unauthorized weapon, ration card belonging to another soldier, failure to have an identification card in his possession and the wrongful possession of marijuana. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2 and a forfeiture of pay.
On 28 September 1968, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 13 April to 26 July 1968, six specifications of failure to go to his place of duty, being disrespectful towards a commissioned officer, assaulting a commissioned officer, disobeying a lawful order from a commissioned officer and communicating a threat to a commissioned officer to kill him. His punishment consisted of confinement at hard labor for 3 months, reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and a forfeiture of pay.
He departed Vietnam on 28 February 1969 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado.
On 13 June 1969, he was convicted by a special court-martial of three specifications of failure to go to his place of duty, disobeying a lawful order from a commissioned officer, and disobeying a lawful order from an NCO. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months and a forfeiture of pay.
The applicant underwent a neuropsychiatric examination on 3 July 1969 and was cleared for administrative separation.
The applicant’s commander notified the applicant on 10 July 1969, that he was recommending him for administrative discharge from the service for unfitness, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. After consulting with counsel, the applicant elected to waive his rights to a hearing before a board of officers and declined to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved the recommendation and directed that he be furnished with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 29 August 1969, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. He had served 2 years, 6 months and 12 days of total active service and had 216 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
On 25 February 1980, while he was incarcerated in a correctional facility in Illinois, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable. He contended at that time that his discharge should be upgraded because the authority for his discharge no longer existed and that he should be paid back pay and allowances. The ADRB determined that his discharge was proper and voted unanimously to deny his request on 5 August 1981.
The available evidence shows that the applicant was initially incarcerated on 27 May 1977 for a variety of felony offenses and that he is currently on parole.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and/or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation (AR) 635-212 was replaced by AR 635-200, chapter 13. It established policy and provided guidance for eliminating enlisted personnel found to be unfit or unsuitable for further military service. An individual could be found unfit for various types of misconduct that included frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities. An undesirable discharge was then and is now normally considered appropriate for such misconduct.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief when compared to his misconduct and his otherwise undistinguished record of service.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__ao____ __wtm __ __clg____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059963 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/11/01 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1969/08/29 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-212/UNFIT |
| DISCHARGE REASON | UNFIT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 583 | 144.5000/A51.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060022C070421
He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months and a forfeiture of pay. On 1 October 1969, the commander of the correctional facility submitted a recommendation to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness, based on his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities. The applicant has failed to convince the Board through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085489C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 25 October 1967, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being AWOL from 3 August to 18 August 1967. The ADRB determined that he had been properly discharged and denied his application on 8 August 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072164C070403
APPLICANT STATES : That he was informed at his court-martial that his discharge would be upgraded after a certain number of years and it has not been done. On 21 August 1969, NJP was imposed against him for failure to obey a lawful order from the battalion commander and for failure to go to his place of duty. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199709470
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 February 1972 the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied his request to upgrade his discharge. This law, enacted on 8 October 1977, provided generally, that no VA benefits could be granted based on any discharge upgraded under the Ford memorandum of 19 January 1977, or the DOD Special Discharge Review Program.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058663C070421
On 21 August 1970, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness and directed that the applicant be furnished a general discharge. On 25 February 1974 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade to honorable. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, four special court-martial convictions and 640 days lost due...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088170C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 13 July 1967, he enlisted in the Army in Memphis, Tennessee, for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004121C070206
He also contends that the failure to timely file is the result of his records being lost and his attempting to obtain copies of those records since 1975. On 30 September 1969, the applicant’s commander initiated action to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016490
He completed 4 months and 16 days of creditable service that was characterized as under conditions other than honorable. When authorized, it was issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. On 20 January 1969, a special court-martial convicted him of being AWOL from 1 July 1967 to 15 March 1968, the day he was apprehended by civil authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199709470C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 February 1972 the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied his request to upgrade his discharge. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __jev____ _mkp ___ __jhk ___ DENY APPLICATION Loren G. Harrell Director INDEX CASE ID AC97-09470/AR1998011427 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 1999/01/27 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067589C070402
On 14 April 1969, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. There is no indication in the available records that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for a discharge upgrade within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.