| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Luis Almodova | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant has submitted no evidence or an argument in support of his request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the US Army Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP), on 1 April 1969. On 16 April 1969, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years for training and assignment in Army Career Group 71, Administration.
The applicant was assigned to Company C, 6th Battalion, 2nd Basic Combat Training Brigade, Fort Dix, New Jersey, to undergo basic combat training.
On 16 May 1969, the applicant received an Article 15 under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for going from his appointed place of duty in his unit without authority. The imposed punishment was a forfeiture of $20.00 pay per month, for one month, and restriction and extra duties for 14 days, to run concurrently. The applicant did not appeal the punishment imposed.
On 21 May 1969, the applicant received an Article 15 under the provisions of the UCMJ for being absent without leave (AWOL) from his unit from 13 May until 16 May 1969 and for having broken restriction to the limits of the company area. The imposed punishment was a forfeiture of $50.00 for one month, restriction to the company area for thirty days, and to sign in every hour, on the hour, during off duty hours. The applicant did not appeal the punishment imposed.
The applicant completed basic combat training on 22 June 1969 and was assigned to Company B, 3rd Battalion 5th Combat Support Training Brigade, on 23 June 1969, to undergo advanced individual training (AIT). On 23 July 1969, the unit was redesignated as Company E, 2nd Battalion, 5th CST Brigade.
On 4 August 1969, while still in AIT, the applicant departed AWOL. He remained in that status until 15 December 1970. The record remains silent about all the circumstances and events that led to his discharge from the Army; but, an entry appears in Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, United States Code), of his DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, which shows that he was confined in the hands of civil authorities from 16 December until 11 February 1971.
There is evidence in the applicant's service personnel record that he was incarcerated in the New Jersey Reformatory at Annandale, New Jersey, and was paroled from that institution on 15 December 1970.
The applicant was discharged in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1, with an undesirable discharge on 11 February 1971 under the provisions Army Regulation 635-206. On his discharge, the applicant had completed 3 months and 15 days active Federal service and had 559 days lost due to AWOL and civil confinement. The applicant's character of service was characterized as under other than honorable conditions. He was awarded a SPN (separation program number) Code, 284, which identifies individuals who are discharged due to conviction by civil court or adjudged to be a juvenile offender during the current period of active duty.
The applicant’s record shows that the highest rank and pay grade he held on active duty was Private, E-1. The record contains no documented acts of valor, achievement, or service warranting special recognition.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
Army Regulation 635-200, also defines a general discharge as a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The discharge proceedings are not available for the Board's review; however, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge and the discharge certificate given are commensurate with his overall record of service.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
3. The Board noted the applicant's desire to have his undesirable discharge upgraded; however, there is no basis upon which to base an upgrade of the applicant's discharge considering the applicant's less than satisfactory record of service.
4. The Board has determined that by entering into conduct that resulted in his being arrested, convicted, and incarcerated, the applicant diminished the quality of his service and did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance expected of Army personnel; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable or a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__wtm___ __le____ __lf____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087372 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030626 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19710211 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-206 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
| 2. | 144.6100 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085954C070212
The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 October 1968. On 2 January 1970, the applicant was notified that a recommendation was being made for his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to his conviction by civil authorities and that an undesirable discharge was being recommended. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705279
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.The Board considered the following evidence: Accordingly, on 28 January 1975 the applicant was discharged after completing 1 year, 8 months, and 8 days of active military service and accruing 204 days of time lost due to civil confinement.There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010716
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. He was convicted by civil authorities on 22 April 1975 and sentenced to incarceration in the State Penitentiary for 3 years. On 14 July 1975 the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations Discharge Misconduct) due to his conviction by civil authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074065C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Articles 15 referred to in the paragraph above are not on file in the applicant's service personnel records; however, according to Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086882C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018213
The applicant requests: a. his undesirable discharge be changed to a medical discharge; and b. his military occupational specialty (MOS) be changed. He was discharged on 22 August 1974 with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to conviction by a civil court. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show a medical discharge was warranted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705279C070209
BOARD DATE: 6 May 1998 DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-05279 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 27 October 1972 the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years at the age of 18. The evidence of record supports that the applicant was discharged, under the provisions of AR 635-206, for conviction by a civil court.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051114C070420
The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 March 1967. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal is awarded to members who have served in Vietnam for 6 months during the period 1 March 1961 to 28 March 1973. The Board accepts that he was assigned to Vietnam from 28 March 1968 – 22 March 1969 (11 months and 25 days), the dates shown in his discharge packet.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022760
On 30 October 1970, counsel notified him that the commander was submitting a recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, AWOL, Desertion), due to being AWOL. On 10 November 1970, the commander (Trainee Personnel Section) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, recommended him for separation under the provisions of paragraph 46a of Army Regulation 635-206 (Misconduct -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016423
BOARD DATE: 13 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016423 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 2 July 1973, his immediate commander submitted a request for authority to discharge the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 based on his conviction by civil authorities of armed robbery, sentence to 12 years of incarceration, and confinement in a state correctional facility. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a civil court for armed...