Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096782C070212
Original file (03096782C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            25 MARCH 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2003096782


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Luther L. Santiful            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr.  |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in combat while serving in Vietnam.
 He states he was wounded in 1971 but does not know "the month or the
location."

3.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 27
May 1971.  The application submitted in this case is dated 20 August 2003.


2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was inducted
and entered active duty on 2 June 1969.  He was trained as an infantryman
and deployed to Vietnam between October 1970 and May 1971.

4.  The applicant's limited service medical records make no mention of any
wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  His May 1971 separation
physical examination also does not indicate any such wounds.  His name was
not among a list of individuals reported as combat casualties during
Vietnam War and item 40 (wounds) on his Department of the Army Form 20
(Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no medical evidence, and the applicant has not provided any,
which confirms that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in
Vietnam.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for an award
of the Purple Heart.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must,
or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or
unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy
this requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 27 May 1971; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on
26 May 1974.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute
of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file
in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LLS___  ___LE___  __TEO__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            ___ Luther L. Santiful_____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2003096782                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040325                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100205C070208

    Original file (04100205C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In the absence of more compelling medical evidence, which shows that the applicant’s hospitalization was the result of wounds sustained as a result of hostile action, it would be inappropriate to award the applicant the Purple Heart at this time, based solely on his physical profile statement and the fact that he was medically evacuated from Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091997C070212

    Original file (03091997C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The unit awards were omitted from his separation document. The evidence confirms the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal with “V” device. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018227

    Original file (20070018227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070018227 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Medical evidence shows shrapnel wounds to his left leg. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059660C070421

    Original file (2001059660C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064754C070421

    Original file (2001064754C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s statement that he was injured while engaged in combat and is entitled to the Purple Heart, documentary evidence is required to correct a military record. Evidence of record shows that the applicant served in four campaigns during the Vietnam War. Therefore, he is entitled to wear four bronze service stars affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his records to shows these service stars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006292C070208

    Original file (040006292C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show entitlement to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, and a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060878C070421

    Original file (2001060878C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 85th Evacuation Hospital...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006840C070208

    Original file (040006840C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 JUNE 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006840 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no medical evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which confirms that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam and as such, there is no basis for an award of the Purple Heart. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083155C070215

    Original file (2002083155C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect a Purple Heart he was awarded as a result of a wounds sustained during combat operations in the Republic of Vietnam. There are no orders which award him the Purple Heart and there is no evidence that he was wounded, or treated for wounds, as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. Evidence of record indicates that the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for two awards of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016362

    Original file (20060016362.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the applicant concerned be corrected by showing award of the, Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 8 June 1970 to 13 December 1971, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars to be...