Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091997C070212
Original file (03091997C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 25 MARCH 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091997


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his award of the Purple Heart be added to his separation document. In a subsequent application he also requested, in effect, that his Army Commendation Medal with “V” device be added to the separation document as well.

2. The applicant states, in effect, that the awards were omitted from his separation document.

3. The applicant provides copies of the award certificates and orders confirming his entitlement to both awards.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 12 May 1970. The applications submitted in this case are dated 21 May 2003 and
29 August 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 13 May 1968. He was trained as an infantryman and in October 1968 he was assigned as a rifleman with the 5th Battalion, 60th Infantry.

4. According to medical documents, messages, and orders contained in his file, he was wounded as a result of hostile action on 14 January 1969 and awarded the Purple Heart. Orders issued by the 1st Infantry Division confirmed the award. The award was omitted from this separation document.

5. As a result of the applicant’s heroic actions on 14 January 1969, he was also awarded the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device. Orders issued by the 1st Infantry Division also confirmed that award. It was also omitted from his separation document.





6. As a result of the applicant’s combat wounds, he was evacuated from Vietnam on 19 January 1969 and ultimately returned to duty at Fort Jackson, South Carolina in April 1969. On 12 May 1970 he was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service.

7. A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) notes the applicant’s unit was credited with participating in two designated campaigns (Vietnam Consolidation IV and V) during the applicant’s period of assignment. Two bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal, which is recorded on his separation document, should reflect his campaign participation. The unit was also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his tenure with the organization. The unit awards were omitted from his separation document.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence confirms the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal with “V” device. His records should be corrected accordingly.

2. The evidence also confirms that the applicant is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.

BOARD VOTE:

__LLS___ __LE ___ __TEO __ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing:

a. he was awarded the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal with “V” device; and

b. he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.




                  ___ Luther L. Santiful______
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091997
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040325
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076889C070215

    Original file (2002076889C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in existing service medical documents, personnel service records, or casualty or unit files, which confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. The Board does note, however, that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 1 September 1969. The Board also notes that the "V" device was omitted from the Army Commendation Medal recorded on the applicant's separation document and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097860C070212

    Original file (03097860C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence also confirms that the applicant was awarded an Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period August 1968 to January 1969 which was omitted from his separation document. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. confirming the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070806C070402

    Original file (2002070806C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal with "V" device. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart, or a Bronze Star Medal with "V" device. As such, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate, and in the interest of justice to confirm award of the Bronze Star Medal but amend the period of the award to coincide with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101542C070208

    Original file (04101542C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his separation document be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device and the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device; b. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001177C070206

    Original file (20050001177C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, via two different application forms and an individual statement, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, a Parachutist Badge, Army Commendation Medal with "V" device, a second award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Purple Heart, and a unit citation. Unfortunately, there is no medical evidence which confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001177C070206

    Original file (20050001177C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, via two different application forms and an individual statement, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, a Parachutist Badge, Army Commendation Medal with "V" device, a second award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Purple Heart, and a unit citation. Unfortunately, there is no medical evidence which confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016590

    Original file (20090016590.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the award he received in Vietnam in 1969 is not recorded on his DD Form 214. Although the applicant’s records do not contain any evidence showing he was ever awarded the Purple Heart, and his name is not among the listing of individuals reported as combat casualties during the Vietnam War, the statement in his Army Commendation Medal with “V” device and his patient status in Japan is sufficiently compelling evidence to conclude the applicant is entitled to an award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076629C070215

    Original file (2002076629C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence also indicates that the applicant was wounded on 25 February 1969, 15 March 1969, and 19 June 1969. As such, the Board concludes that the applicant's records should be corrected to reflect award of five Purple Hearts (25 February, 15 March, 23 March, 19 May, and 19 June 1969). The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 24 June 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011775

    Original file (20080011775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011775 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, his records do not show that orders were ever published awarding him the Purple Heart for his wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004501C070205

    Original file (20060004501C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Four bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal, which is recorded on his separation document, should reflect his campaign participation. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 19 March 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing that he was awarded a Bronze Star Medal with "V" device and an Army Commendation Medal; b. by showing he...