Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100205C070208
Original file (04100205C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            03 JUNE 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004100205


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Luther Santiful               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Roger Able                    |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in Vietnam and hospitalized in
Vietnam, Japan and at an Army hospital in Denver, Colorado.  He states that
he just wanted to get out of the Army and get back to his family.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a temporary physical profile for a
suspected "torn right med. meniscus."

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 19 January 1968.  The application submitted in this case
is dated
29 October 2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered
active duty on 21 January 1966 and was trained as a military policeman.

4.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 31 October 1966 and was assigned to
the 504th Military Police Company.  In July 1967 he was reassigned from his
military police company to the 249th General Hospital and ultimately
evacuated to Fitzsimons General Hospital in Colorado in August 1967.  In
September 1967 he was issued a temporary physical profile which precluded
extensive walking or standing for a 2 month period.  He was subsequently
returned to duty with a military police unit at Fort Ord, California.

5.  On 19 January 1968 the applicant was released from active duty at the
completion of his service contract.  His separation document does not
reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart.

6.  There were no service medical records available to the Board, nor
provided by the applicant.  Item 40 (wounds) on his Department of the Army
Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.  The applicant last
authenticated his Department of the Army Form 20 on 19 October 1967 when he
arrived at Fort Ord, California.
7.  The applicant's name is not among a list of individuals reported as
combat casualties during the Vietnam War.

8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

9.  A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and
Campaign Participation Credit Register) notes the applicant’s unit was
credited with participating in two designated campaigns (Vietnam
Counteroffensive Phases II and III) during the applicant’s period of
assignment.  Two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, which
is reflected on his separation document, should reflect his campaign
participation.  The unit was also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry
Cross Unit Citation with Palm during his tenure with the organization.  His
campaign participation and unit award were omitted from his separation
document.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the evidence does suggest that the applicant may have received
medical treatment while in Vietnam and was subsequently evacuated and
issued a physical profile, the limited medical information available to the
Board, makes it impossible to determine if the applicant was in fact
wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam.  In the absence of
more compelling medical evidence, which shows that the applicant’s
hospitalization was the result of wounds sustained as a result of hostile
action, it would be inappropriate to award the applicant the Purple Heart
at this time, based solely on his physical profile statement and the fact
that he was medically evacuated from Vietnam.

2.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 19 January 1968; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
18 January 1971.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to file in this case.

3.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LS____  __RA ___  __PM ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.

3.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show entitlement to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam
Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation
with Palm.




            ____ Luther Santiful_______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004100205                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040603                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001012C070206

    Original file (20050001012C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 7 December 1967 clinical record which the applicant submits with his request, shows that the applicant was transferred from the 71st Evacuation Hospital (in Vietnam) and admitted to the United States Army Hospital at Camp Zama in Japan on 9 November 1967 for an evaluation of seizure disorder. The applicant had a seizure disorder and dislocated his shoulder in Vietnam in November 1967. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001012C070206

    Original file (20050001012C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 7 December 1967 clinical record which the applicant submits with his request, shows that the applicant was transferred from the 71st Evacuation Hospital (in Vietnam) and admitted to the United States Army Hospital at Camp Zama in Japan on 9 November 1967 for an evaluation of seizure disorder. On 24 March 1993 this Board denied the applicant’s request for physical disability retirement or discharge. The applicant had a seizure disorder and dislocated his shoulder in Vietnam in November 1967.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106468C070208

    Original file (2004106468C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, Company A, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 5th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 9 August 1965 through 19 May 1969, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 59, dated 1969. Evidence shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000045C070206

    Original file (20050000045C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart. Counsel requests correction of the applicant’s records to reflect award of the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005729C070206

    Original file (20050005729C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal; however, it does not show the bronze service stars to which the applicant is entitled for campaign participation. He was evacuated from Vietnam to Japan then to the United States and was released to duty without profile. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from the applicant's DD Form 214; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085165C070212

    Original file (2003085165C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-6 (SSG) and by awarding him the Purple Heart. The applicant states that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 prior to his REFRAD and he was wounded in Vietnam and was subsequently hospitalized in Vietnam and Japan; however, his records were never updated to reflect this information. Accordingly, the Board finds that his records should be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040009079C070208

    Original file (040009079C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 14 November 1968; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 13 November 1971. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division at St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005868C070206

    Original file (20050005868C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no service medical records available to the Board, or provided by the applicant, beyond his separation physical examination. Further, it directed that all personnel treated and released within 24 hours would be awarded the Purple Heart by the organization to which the individual was assigned. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004870

    Original file (20090004870.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Records show the applicant served in the RVN from 8 February to 19 June 1969; however, item 30 of his DD Form 214 fails to document his service in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item 41; the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060010670C071029

    Original file (AR20060010670C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he has records showing that he was medically evacuated out of the field with a perforated ear drum when he was an infantryman. The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 15 November 1968, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 2, at the expiration of his term of service, He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent...