| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. Robert L. Duecaster | Member |
2. The applicant requests that the term of her extension contract be corrected from 1 year 6 months, to 1 year.
3. The applicant states that Army Regulation 140-111, Rule A, only permits extensions for up to 1 year. If the term of her extension contract is corrected, she will qualify for a reenlistment bonus because she will have less than 14 years of service, a prerequisite for a reenlistment bonus.
4. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Enlistment Program on 14 May 1988.
5. She enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 October 1988, was awarded the military occupational specialty of administrative specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-4. She was honorably released from active duty on 3 April 1992 as part of the early transition program.
6. She enlisted in the Army National Guard for 5 years on 4 June 1992.
7. She enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) for 8 years on 20 August 1993.
8. On 11 August 2001, she extended her 20 August 1993 enlistment for 1 year and 6 months under the provisions of Army Regulation 140-111, Table 3-1,
Rule A.
9. Army Regulation 140-111, Table 3-1, Rule A, allows for the extension of a reservist for any reason provided that the reservist is otherwise qualified for reenlistment. The period of extension under this rule is limited to 12 months.
10. Paragraph 3-5.1 of this regulation states that a correction to the term of service or effective date of an extension is prohibited and requires the authority of the Board to correct.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was extended for a term of service which exceeded the maximum allowed by Army Regulation 140-111, Table 3-1, Rule A.
2. This is an error which requires the authority of the Board to correct.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned extended her 20 August 1993 enlistment in the USAR for a period of 1 year.
BOARD VOTE:
___fne__ ____slp__ ___rlw___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__________Fred N. Eichorn_________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002084540 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002084540 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010444C070208
The applicant states that she should have been extended from her original MSO (military service obligation) date of 28 February 1999 and not the enlistment/reenlistment contract she executed on 22 October 1999 which she executed when she went from the Army National Guard to the Army Reserve. On 22 October 1999 the applicant executed an enlistment/reenlistment contract in the United States Army Reserve. Table 3-1, rule A, of Army Regulation 140-111 authorizes extensions for a period of up...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082524C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her records be corrected to show that she completed 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded: As such, the Board must conclude that the applicant choose not to reenlist, rather than was denied reenlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069746C070402
She states that her unit extended her enlistment until 2 April 2001, and that extension together with the first 60 day extension met the guidance provided by the 88 th RSC. • On 21 September 2000 the 645 th SSA recommended to the 88 th RSC that based on the advice of the USARC (Army Reserve Command) [that even though the applicant was on the weight control program, the command still needed to address the erroneous extension], he recommended that separation action continue simultaneously...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012388
The applicant provides: * DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer/Board of Officers), dated 13 December 1992, and related documents * DA Form 4697 (Department of the Army Report of Survey), dated 6 January 1993, and related documents * DA Form 4651-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment), dated 24 January 1993 * an undated memorandum to the applicant, subject: Reduction Under Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012620
In an advisory opinion, dated 9 November 2007, obtained in the processing of this case, the Director, Army Reserve Active Duty Management Directorate, cited Rule P, table 3-8, Army Regulation 140-111 and recommended approval of the applicant's request to have his reenlistment contract, dated 26 June 2005, voided. AR 140-111 governs USAR reenlistment and extension programs. Since the applicant's ETS date is 21 March 2008, it is also appropriate to authorize an antedated extension or a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054499C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Despite the applicant’s contentions that he completed the legal specialist course and that he extended because of the uncertainty of when he could attend phase II of the legal specialist school; the facts in the record show that he extended under a rule for those requiring a reentry code waiver. Additionally, the Board could not determine what legal specialist class dates...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509602C070209
His unit clerk told him that since he had enlisted for 3 years, he could extend his enlistment for an additional 3 years and establish eligibility for the MGIB. On 1 December 1994 the applicant completed a DA Form 4836, Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment, in which he extended his 2 November 1993 3-year enlistment for an additional 3 years. Since it was the applicants stated intent to enlist for the MGIB, it would be equitable to correct the term of service on his enlistment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020456
The applicant requests the DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) that she executed on 3 February 2010 be voided and removed from her military service records. The applicant and a commissioned officer signed the document on 3 February 2010. d. Two email messages that show: (1) On 15 September 2011, an Army official indicated that the applicant: * was not authorized an affiliation bonus because she was required to reenlist for 1 year upon assignment and failed to do...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016532C070206
Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides two enlistment contracts, dated 12 April 1999 and 15 July 2004; an extract from Army Regulation 140-111; an email dated 19 July 2005; her AGR active duty orders; and reassignment orders dated 19 April 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by voiding her...