Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509602C070209
Original file (9509602C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his term of enlistment in the USAR be corrected from 3 to 6 years and that he be issued a Notice of Basic Eligibility (NOBE) for educational benefits under the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB).

3.  The applicant states that he enlisted for the MGIB but was later told by the VA when he attempted to use his educational benefits that he was not eligible for MGIB benefits since he did not incur a 6-year military obligation when he enlisted.  His unit clerk told him that since he had enlisted for 3 years, he could extend his enlistment for an additional 3 years and establish eligibility for the MGIB.  Based on that advice, he extended his enlistment for 3 years only to be told that he is still not eligible for MGIB benefits.

4.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the USAR for 3 years on 2 November 1993 in pay grade E-3.  He had completed 1 year, 11 months and 16 days of prior active duty at that time.  

5.  In conjunction with his enlistment, he completed a DA Form 3286-67 which indicates that he was enlisting for the MGIB.

6.  On 1 December 1994 the applicant completed a DA Form 4836, Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment, in which he extended his 2 November 1993 3-year enlistment for an additional 3 years.  Item 9 of that form, authority and reason for this extension has “Rule R, Army Regulation 
140-111” entered.

7.  Rule R, Army Regulation 140-111, provides for the extension of reservists and guardsmen for the period necessary to provide for a remaining term of service of 6 years in order to establish MGIB eligibility.

8.  The policies and procedures for the MGIB for members of the USAR are outlined in Army Regulation 135-7.  This regulation provides for issuing an individual who is assigned to an ARNG or USAR unit, or who is assigned to an Individual Mobilization Augmentee position, or who is on active duty in the AGR program and established eligibility for the MGIB prior to 1 July 1990 for USAR soldiers and 1 October 1990 for ARNG soldiers, an NOBE if he or she enlists, reenlists or extends an enlistment for not less than 6 years.

9.  Title 38, U.S. Code, section 3012, specifies, in pertinent part, that a reservist is eligible for the MGIB if he or she initially entered in an Armed Force after 30 June 1985.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed an MGIB addendum to his enlistment contract and would reasonably think that his recruiter would insure that the terms of his enlistment would support that enlistment incentive.

2.  Likewise, he extended his enlistment for 3 years based on the assurance of his unit clerk that the extension would entitle him to MGIB benefits.  That was not true.

3.  Since it was the applicant’s stated intent to enlist for the MGIB, it would be equitable to correct the term of service on his enlistment contract from 3 to 6 years, thereby establishing MGIB eligibility at the date of his enlistment.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned enlisted for 6 years on 2 November 1993 with entitlement to MGIB benefits.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608093C070209

    Original file (9608093C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: That she was told when she reenlisted while serving on active duty in the Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) program that she could not enlist for the MGIB as all individuals in the AGR program are automatically enrolled for that incentive. This regulation provides for issuing an individual who is assigned to an Army National Guard (ARNG) or USAR unit, or who is assigned to an Individual Mobilization Augmentee position, or who is on active duty in the AGR program and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075428C070403

    Original file (2002075428C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    That was the date he should have executed the MGIB Kicker Addendum. The MGIB Kicker is an enlistment incentive, and is required to be executed at the time of the soldier’s enlistment or, in the case of Guardsmen, extension of their enlistment. At that time he was not a member of the Select Reserve, so he was not eligible for the MGIB Kicker.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002084540C070215

    Original file (2002084540C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that Army Regulation 140-111, Rule A, only permits extensions for up to 1 year. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Enlistment Program on 14 May 1988. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned extended her 20 August 1993 enlistment in the USAR for a period of 1 year.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212

    Original file (2003085863C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506078C070209

    Original file (9506078C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he was illegally denied reenlistment which was later corrected by his being authorized an antedated reenlistment. In support of his application he submits a letter from his commander who confirms that the applicant was occupying an E-8 position, that he had forwarded promotion packets for the applicant, and that the applicant was separated under the QMP without being issued a 20 year letter. The USARC recommended that the Board validate the revocation of his 1986 discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106206C070208

    Original file (04106206C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    That same document contained a statement, initialed by the applicant, which read that he was “not a previous recipient of a bonus for enlistment, reenlistment, or extension of enlistment in a reserve component.” c. Department of the Army Form 5435-1-R (Statement of Understanding – The Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill Kicker Program) indicating that he was enlisting in the United States Army Reserve as a prior service candidate and that he was entitled to the MGIB-SR Kicker incentive in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010444C070208

    Original file (20040010444C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she should have been extended from her original MSO (military service obligation) date of 28 February 1999 and not the enlistment/reenlistment contract she executed on 22 October 1999 which she executed when she went from the Army National Guard to the Army Reserve. On 22 October 1999 the applicant executed an enlistment/reenlistment contract in the United States Army Reserve. Table 3-1, rule A, of Army Regulation 140-111 authorizes extensions for a period of up...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012388

    Original file (20130012388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer/Board of Officers), dated 13 December 1992, and related documents * DA Form 4697 (Department of the Army Report of Survey), dated 6 January 1993, and related documents * DA Form 4651-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment), dated 24 January 1993 * an undated memorandum to the applicant, subject: Reduction Under Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509751C070209

    Original file (9509751C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records by changing the date of his reenlistment from 26 June 1991 to 26 December 1991. The opinion of the OCAR was that the applicant’s reenlistment date should not be changed as requested. Since the OCAR has updated the Department of Defense records to reflect the applicant’s correct eligibility date of 26 June 1991, this action has, in effect, extended the applicant’s time for use of this entitlement as long as he remains a member of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012620

    Original file (20070012620.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 9 November 2007, obtained in the processing of this case, the Director, Army Reserve Active Duty Management Directorate, cited Rule P, table 3-8, Army Regulation 140-111 and recommended approval of the applicant's request to have his reenlistment contract, dated 26 June 2005, voided. AR 140-111 governs USAR reenlistment and extension programs. Since the applicant's ETS date is 21 March 2008, it is also appropriate to authorize an antedated extension or a...