Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
Mr. Thomas D. Howard, Jr. | Member | |
Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show that he was an infantry soldier, assigned to a cavalry division in Vietnam, and that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states that his separation document does not show his service in Vietnam and that he has been trying to prove to his friends, family, and hospital treatment team, that he served in Vietnam, despite the lack of that information on his separation document. He submits no evidence in support of his request.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted and entered active duty on 16 December 1970. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training, and on 2 July 1971 was awarded a military specialty of 76A (supply clerk).
Orders issued at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, where the applicant was undergoing training, reassigned the applicant to the United States Army Personnel Center at Fort Lewis, Washington, upon completion of training. His reporting date to Fort Lewis was established as 21 July 1971.
On 22 July 1971 the applicant assumed duties as a supply specialist at the Personnel Center at Fort Lewis.
Although documents associated with his administrative separation action were not available to the Board, his separation document does indicate that the applicant was released from active duty on 10 November 1971, with an honorable characterization of service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33 for failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotion advancement. At the time of his separation he had approximately 11 months of active service. His separation document indicates that he did not have any Vietnam service and there is no evidence in available records that the applicant was ever assigned to Vietnam.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that he served in Vietnam. In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis to correct his record.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 10 November 1971, the date the applicant was released from active duty and authenticated his separation document. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 10 November 1974.
The application is dated 2 November 2002 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS __ __TDH __ ___TL___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
CASE ID | AR2002082450 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20030722 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
2. | 110.00 |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065602C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. From April 1969 until his return to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006435
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 October 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070006435 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011086C070208
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the rank of corporal instead of specialist four. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct that error by showing the rank of corporal in Item 5a of his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706026
The Board considered the following evidence: Army Regulation 40-501 provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007976C070205
The applicant requests correction of item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his last name as “_ _ _ZAR”; correction of item 3 (Social Security Number) to show the last four digits of his social security number (SSN) as “6467”; and correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show award of the Purple Heart. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010128
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application, and there is no evidence of record, to support his claim that he was awarded the BSM in Vietnam. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002374C070208
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect completion of a sniper school course and advanced individual training (AIT). The applicant’s DD Form 214 does show that he completed AIT. Consequently, the sniper school course which he completed is not required to be listed on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100071C070208
A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) fails to show any evidence that the applicant ever served in Vietnam or that he was ever wounded. The documents submitted by the applicant from the War Department indicating that he was being sent the Purple Heart are not accepted as creditable evidence because they are not consistent with the facts. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 16 March 1971;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018797
The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 8 February 1972; copies of Special Orders Number 87, 136, and 229, issued by Headquarters, 3d Brigade (Separate), 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), on 5 July 1971, 23 August 1971, and 24 November 1971, respectively; a copy of the 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion Promotion Standing List, dated 30 November 1971; a copy of Special Orders Number 39, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, on 8 February 1972;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000015C070206
Jeanette McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. The citation and the award certificate that he submits with his request indicates that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal on 4 January 1971 for meritorious service from 26 January 1970 to 25 January 1971, an obvious error as the applicant had been released from...