| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth Aucock | Analyst |
| Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern, III | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, physical disability retirement or separation.
He states that he returned to the United States at Fort Lewis, Washington from Vietnam, for outprocessing. An officer informed him that he would have to remain at Fort Lewis for two weeks for medical processing. He had no desire to stay there for two weeks. The officer then told him to go to the VA for a disability rating for the wounds he received in combat.
He states that that officer should have informed him of the benefits inherent in a physical disability separation. He wants a physical disability rating by the Army in order that he can fly on military standby flights. He states that he is receiving a 100 percent disability rating from the VA.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He entered the Army on 18 September 1968, completed training as an infantryman and in March 1969 was assigned to a cavalry unit of the 198th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam.
On 21 June 1969 the applicant was slightly wounded to both legs and his right arm by fragments from a booby trap. On 11 September 1969 he was slightly wounded again, receiving fragmentation wounds to his left arm, chest, and left side of his face.
The applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 5 November 1969. He returned to the United States and was released from active duty at Fort Lewis on
23 April 1970. His DD Form 214 shows that he received the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, and two awards of the Purple Heart, among others. He had 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of service.
Army Regulation 40-501 provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating. Performance of duty despite an impairment would be considered presumptive evidence of physical fitness.
Army Regulation 635-40 provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 23 April 1970, the date of his release from active duty. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 23 April 1973.
The application is dated 27 January 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jh___ ___fne__ ___tbr__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
| CASE ID | AC |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711060
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In a previous application to this Board, he requested, in effect, physical disability retirement or separation Since there is no evidence that the applicant's condition was not medically unfitting for retention at the time in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, there was no basis for medical retirement or separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102352C070208
Patrick McGann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was discharged from the hospital following surgery. He is now rated at 70 percent disabled because of PTSD, for a total disability rating of 100 percent.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711060C070209
The applicants DA Form 20 does not show that he was wounded in action, nor does it show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. Since there is no evidence that the applicant's condition was not medically unfitting for retention at the time in accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, there was no basis for medical retirement or separation. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he was wounded in action against an enemy of the United States.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710409
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, disability retirement or separation. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510586C070209
Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rated at least 30 percent. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711464
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant states that she was raped during her military service, was not allowed an attorney, or even counseling, but sent back to her unit, which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 1997002268
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. A board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service because of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707314
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007785C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded while riding in a personnel carrier that hit an enemy mine and was evacuated to a hospital for treatment; however, he was not awarded the Purple Heart. He departed Vietnam on 8 July 1971 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, where he remained until he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability with severance pay (10%) on 22 May 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008934C070208
An 8 October 1968 report of medical examination shows that the applicant was medically qualified for separation with a physical profile of 1 1 3T 1 1 1. The evidence shows that the applicant was treated for two months at Ireland Army Hospital at Fort Knox, after which medical personnel felt that his condition was such that he could be discharged from the hospital. At the time of the separation physical examination, competent medical authority determined that the applicant was then...