| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, physical disability retirement or separation.
The applicant states that he was treated for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but was considered a non combat veteran. He was a cannoneer for the last four months of his tour in Vietnam, involved in combat. [His unit] had three fire missions at one time. He was hauling ammunition when a muzzle blast from a 105mm howitzer scarred his ear drums. His ears ring all the time and he is on edge all the time. His hearing is gone.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant was inducted into the Army on 12 September 1967, completed training, and in June 1968 was assigned to an artillery battery in Vietnam, first as a supply clerk, then as a power station operator. From April 1969 until his return to the United States in June 1969 he was a cannoneer with that artillery battery.
The applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, on four occasions during his military service. He was arraigned, tried, and pled guilty to AWOL before a special court-martial on 25 April 1969.
The applicant was released from active duty at Fort Lewis, Washington, on 29 June 1969 upon his return to the United States. He had 1 year, 8 months, and 14 days of service and 34 days of lost time.
Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
Army Regulation 635-40, then in effect, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, to indicate that he was physically unfit at the time of his release from active duty and as such there is no basis to correct his record to show physical disability retirement or separation.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 29 June 1969, the date of his release from active duty. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 June 1972.
The application is dated 30 October 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant’s entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant’s failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FNE __ ___LE___ ___TL___ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065602 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020328 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 142.00 |
| 2. | 108.00 |
| 3. | 177 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086227C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He could not perform his duties at Fort Bliss because of his profile, and therefore he was assigned to an organization in Germany. The applicant's commanding officer recommended to the separation authority that the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073312C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. For those who elected to earn a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010270
However, his record contains a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 20 August 1970 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service with an under conditions other than honorable discharge. With respect to a medical discharge, there is no evidence in his records which shows he was physically or mentally...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013056
The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded or changed to show he was medically discharged. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides that an honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057016C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 23 May 1986 the applicant was informed that his second request for reconsideration had been reviewed, but not considered by the Board because he had not submitted any new material evidence to establish error or injustice. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013790
The VA, which has neither the authority nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual's civilian employability. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was medically discharged because he was issued permanent physical profiles for his back and hearing loss, he did not receive a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005137C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 2 May 1969 and was subsequently permanently retired by reason of physical disability in the rank of SP4. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect in blocks 5a., 5b., and 6, that his rank is SP4, pay grade E-4, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068224C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069855C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001819C070206
As far as he could tell the private was not a homosexual. Class I included those cases which involved an invasion of the rights of another person as where the homosexual act was accompanied by assault or coercion or where cooperation or consent was obtained through fraud; Class II included those cases wherein personnel subject to court-martial jurisdiction engaged in one or more provable homosexual acts not within the purview of Class I; Class III included cases of overt, confirmed...