Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010044
Original file (20090010044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010044 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states that when he returned from overseas he was stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia.  He goes on to state that he got married and found out that his wife was cheating on him with his platoon sergeant.  He continues by stating that he had a breakdown and received psychiatric treatment after the event.  He also states that because of his wife's infidelity, he went absent without leave (AWOL).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and 12 third-party letters of support.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests that the applicant's BCD be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  Counsel states, in effect, that the issues raised by the applicant along with the character references he provides amply advance his case for an upgrade.

3.  Counsel provides no additional documents with the application.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Montgomery, Alabama on 15 May 1979 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman.  He completed his one-station unit training (OSUT) at Fort Benning, Georgia and was transferred to Germany on 29 August 1979.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 15 March 1980.

3.  On 5 May 1982, he reenlisted in the pay grade of E-4 for a period of 4 years, assignment to Fort Benning, and a selective reenlistment bonus.  He departed Germany on 11 May 1982 for assignment to Fort Benning, which is located in Columbus, Georgia.  He got married on 6 December 1982 and his spouse resided in Columbus.

4.  On 11 January 1983, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for failure to go to his place of duty.

5.  On 9 March 1983, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for failure to go to his place of duty.

6.  The applicant went AWOL on 15 April 1983 and remained absent until he returned to military control on 29 April 1983.  He again departed AWOL on 3 May 2003 and remained AWOL until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Phenix City, Alabama on 15 June 1983 and returned to military control at Fort Benning, where charges were preferred against him for the two AWOL offenses.

7.  On 22 July 1983, the applicant was convicted pursuant to his plea by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 15 April to 29 April and 3 May to 15 June 1983.  He was sentenced to a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay, confinement at hard labor for 2 months, and a BCD.
8.  On 27 September 1984, the applicant was discharged pursuant to a duly reviewed and affirmed court-martial conviction.  He had served 4 years, 11 months, and 22 days of total active service and had approximately 141 days of lost time due to imprisonment and being AWOL.  

9.  On 4 December 1998, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge.  At that time, he indicated that he was young and that he knew his actions were not appropriate.  He went on to state that he was trying to get his life together, that he was receiving counseling for anger and that he needed his discharge upgraded in order to get a decent job.  After a thorough review of the applicant's records and the issues submitted, the ADRB determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny his request on 19 May 1999.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.     

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

2.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the available facts of the case.

3.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted; however, he has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.   
  
4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  _____x___  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010044



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010044



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006720

    Original file (20090006720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 January 1971, the applicant's commander initiated action to discharge the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to conviction by civil authorities. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 16 July 1971, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, due to conviction by civil authorities. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010625

    Original file (20140010625 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 February 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010625 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006406

    Original file (20110006406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by the U.S. Army Court of Military Review. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 July 1978, and he cited his DOB as 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508252C070209

    Original file (9508252C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    At Fort Jackson, he went AWOL again; this time from 21 July 1968 to 16 October 1968. He was tried by a general court-martial on 17 March 1971, convicted, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 10 months, forfeiture of $95 per month for 10 months, and a BCD. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071577C070402

    Original file (2002071577C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He departed Germany on 21 July 1978, en route to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with a report date of 24 August 1978. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL from 24 August 1978, until he was returned to military control on 7 September and charges were preferred against him for the absent without leave (AWOL) offense.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091337C070212

    Original file (2003091337C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the available records are not specific as to his disqualification, they show that nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for misconduct, which resulted in his reduction to the pay grade of E-1. On 17 November 1982, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no indication in the available records to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002767

    Original file (20090002767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. He was 20 years of age at the time of his assignment to Germany and he was 21 years of age at time of his drug offenses. Given the seriousness of the offenses for which he was convicted, his record was not considered sufficiently meritorious to warrant clemency in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086025C070212

    Original file (2003086025C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 23 August 1984 in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, section IV, as a result of court-martial. After reviewing the applicant service record, the Board found no basis upon which to grant clemency and an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019052

    Original file (20080019052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for a discharge upgrade has been carefully reviewed and determined to be without merit. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019052 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019052 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...