Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003895
Original file (20140003895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  7 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003895 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his military records by changing his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to uncharacterized and changing the reason for his separation.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was assigned to the 55th Military Police Company, 94th Military Police Battalion, 2d Infantry Division located in the Republic of Korea.  On 12 February 2010, a special court-martial convicted him of indecent acts and dereliction in the performance of his duties. He was sentenced to reduction to Private, pay grade E1; confinement for 90 days; and to a BCD.  He understands that what he did was wrong and in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  He has spent the last 4 years reflecting on his failure.  Having suffered the ramifications of his discharge and his inability to obtain employment in the civilian sector, he has run out of lawful ways to earn an income to support his family.  He understands it is asking a lot, but he requests the Board allow him the opportunity to redeem himself.  This is the only time he ever caused trouble.  It can be proven that his crime was an isolated incident.  He has an otherwise clean record.  He failed the military and himself and agrees he deserved punishment.  However, he feels it should have been nonjudicial punishment (NJP) with loss of pay and rank, not a court-martial that has destroyed his life.  He has significant emergency medical service (EMS) and law enforcement training and has had many job offers to include fast food restaurants.  But they have been withdrawn because of his military discharge, not because of the crimes committed.  He voluntarily joined the military and now has no future because of it.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DA Form 4430 (Department of the Army Report of Result of Trial), corrected copy
* Certification Card, Emergency Medical Technician, State of Maryland, effective 1 July 2013
* Concealed Firearms Permit, State of Maryland, issued 6 August 2013
* Letter, County of Cumberland, Maine, dated 15 November 2013
* Email communication, Pratt and Whitney, dated 8 January 2014
* Email communication, Mobile Health Medics, dated 21 January 2014
* Email communication, Maine Medical Center, dated 29 January 2014
* Email communication, Sears Logistics Services, LLC, dated 29 January 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120013866, on 12 February 2013.

2.  The applicant has provided new documentary evidence and different argument that now requires consideration by the Board.

3.  The original ROP shows that the Board considered the applicant's request for an upgrade of his BCD to a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

	a.  The applicant had argued that he had pled guilty to two misdemeanor charges.  He was advised that a BCD would be placed on the table but that due to the nature of the transgressions, there was no way it would be used.  He also argued that he should have received NJP that would have provided a lesser punishment.  He contended that he only had one negative incident with law enforcement.

	b.  A special court-martial convicted the applicant of engaging in sexual intercourse in the barracks with a female civilian while a minor child was in the room witnessing the act.  He was also convicted of willful dereliction in the performance of his duties by having in his barracks room non-military visitors under the age of 18, not members of his immediate family and unaccompanied by a parent or legal guardian.

	c.  The Board noted that the applicant was a military policeman.  It also determined that the charges warranted trial by a court-martial and that the resulting sentence was in accordance with the applicable law and regulations.

4.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 governs the policies and procedures for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 11 provides that a member will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial after completion of appellate review and after such affirmed sentence has been ordered duly executed.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

7.  A review of the documents provided by the applicant shows that:

	a.  he has a concealed firearms permit for the State of Maine;

	b.  he is a certified emergency medical technician in the State of Maryland; and

	c.  he has applied for the following employment without acceptance:

* Corrections officer, Cumberland County Sheriff's Office
* Protective Services Specialist, Pratt and Whitney, United Technologies Corporation
* Emergency Medical Technician, North East Mobile Health Services
* Security Officer, Maine Medical Center
* Loss Prevention Associate, Sears Logistics Services, LLC

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by changing his BCD to uncharacterized and changing the reason for his separation because his crime was an isolated incident and he has an otherwise clean record.

2.  The applicant's trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.  His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the BCD appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

3.  Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the available facts of the case.

4.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge, if clemency is determined to be appropriate, to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Given the seriousness of the applicant's misconduct, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.

5.  The applicant was a military policeman and should have known, better than most other Soldiers, the consequences of his behavior; particularly, when it involved a minor child.

6.  The applicant argues that he has no future because he joined the military and received a BCD.  More to the point, his future prospects are the result of his willful and unacceptable criminal acts.

7.  The applicant's difficulty in obtaining civilian employment is not an appropriate basis for clemency in his case or for an upgrade of his discharge.

8.  In view of the above, the applicant request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20120013866, dated 12 February 2013.




      ____________x_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003895





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003895



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007705

    Original file (20060007705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060007705 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015082

    Original file (20110015082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 1 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015082 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his record to show he received a general discharge (GD). The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021725

    Original file (20140021725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 30 August 2013 under the provisions of paragraph 5-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of Secretarial authority. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. 10 USC 1174 provides that a regular enlisted member of an Armed Force, who is discharged involuntarily or as a result of denial of reenlistment, and who has completed 6 or more but less than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017382

    Original file (20110017382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), by reason of "court-martial, other." Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The record does not show, nor has the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001589

    Original file (20120001589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 28 March 2006, shows the applicant was charged with desertion and AWOL. General Court-Martial Order Number 11, Headquarters, Fort Hood, Fort Hood, TX, dated 15 February 2007, shows the following charges and findings: a. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010350

    Original file (20090010350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 6 August 2008, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03229

    Original file (BC 2013 03229 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    JAJM states that upgrading the applicant’s BCD is not appropriate and recommends the Board deny the request as untimely or on the merits. It also indicates that a bad conduct discharge is more than merely a service characterization; it is a punishment for the crimes the applicant committed while a member of the armed forces. While JAJM states that a BCD is for bad conduct and more than merely a service characterization, all his charges stemmed from one incident.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001776

    Original file (20140001776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140001776 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the final discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012940

    Original file (20130012940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012940 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable or general discharge is not warranted in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001756

    Original file (20140001756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, he is asking that the Board grant his request and allow him to give back to the military. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to warrant an upgrade of his discharge based on clemency.