Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510227C070209
Original file (9510227C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was entitled to receive a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) as a result of his entry into and successful completion of the bonus extension and retraining (BEAR) program.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he reenlisted on 7 October 1987 for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91C under the BEAR program and was informed at the time he reenlisted that he had to reenlist for the training because he could not extend his enlistment for a period of more than 30 months.  Consequently, he was denied the payment of an SRB because he was serving in the pay grade of E-5 with more than one reenlistment.  He goes on to state that he subsequently learned that his fellow classmates who attended the same training received an SRB upon completion of the training and that he had been improperly advised that he could not extend his enlistment vice reenlisting, which ultimately resulted in his being denied an SRB.  

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

On 15 September 1987 the applicant submitted a request for Regular Army reenlistment based on his approved request for reclassification and approval to attend an Army service school for training in MOS 91C from 1 November 1987 through 14 December 1988.  His request was approved by his commander on the same day.

He reenlisted in the pay grade of E-5 on 7 October 1987 for a period of 4 years with no bonus entitlements.  This was his second reenlistment (applicant had 6 years, 3 months, and 1 day of total active service).

The applicant attended the 91C school and was awarded the MOS of 91C upon successful completion of the course on 14 December 1988.

On 4 October 1991 he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 under the provisions of Army Regulation     635-200, chapter 4, due to the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 10 years, 3 months, and 1 day of total active service.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  It opined, in effect, that the applicant attended training under a reclassification action and that he was not eligible for entry into the BEAR program due to his time in service.  It further opined that the applicant, based on his time in service (over 6 years), was in zone “B” at the time he reenlisted for his training and that there was no bonus authorized for MOS 91C in zone “B” at that time or at the time he completed his training.

Army Regulation 601-280 outlines the objectives of the SRB program and establishes the zones of eligibility.  It states, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the SRB program is to offer an incentive for retention of soldiers in critical skills necessary to meet the needs of the Army which are subject to change.  It further states that Zone “A” applies to personnel who reenlist in critical MOS’s who have between 21 months and 6 years of active federal service (AFS).  Zone “B” applies to personnel with 6 to 10 years of AFS, and Zone “C” applies to personnel with 10 to 14 years of AFS.

Chapter 9 of that regulation provides policy and procedures for entry into the BEAR program.  It states, in pertinent part, that the BEAR program allows eligible soldiers an opportunity to extend their enlistment for formal retraining in a shortage MOS that is presently in the SRB program and upon completion of retraining be awarded the new primary MOS, reenlist, and receive an SRB in the new MOS.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  The applicant was not eligible to reenlist under the BEAR program for training in MOS 91C due to his having over 6 years of service at the time he reenlisted and by virtue of there not being a bonus available for that MOS in zone “B”.  

2.  Consequently, the applicant was afforded the opportunity to request reclassification and training in MOS 91C without the benefit of receiving a bonus.

3.  The applicant’s reenlistment contract dated 7 October 1987 shows no indication that he was promised a bonus or that his reenlistment was in conjunction with his entry into the BEAR program.  However, his request for reenlistment clearly indicates that he had an approved request for reclassification with a confirmed school date at the time he requested reenlistment.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request. 

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607659C070209

    Original file (9607659C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that upon completion of his Bonus Extension and Retraining (BEAR) Program training in MOS 91C, he was offered the option to reenlist in the pay grade of E-4 the day before graduation. On 6 December 1991 the applicant reenlisted for the first time for a period of 4 years with no entitlement to an SRB. The PERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s reenlistment contract of 6 December 1991 be corrected to reflect that he reenlisted on 1 July 1989 for a period of 5 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605182C070209

    Original file (9605182C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, she submitted her request for reclassification from the MOS of a personnel management specialist (75C) to MOS 91C. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded: 1. The applicant was properly enlisted in the pay grade of E-3 in MOS 75C at the time of her enlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608480C070209

    Original file (9608480C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, because the applicant reenlisted for 2 years instead of 3 years, he did not meet the minimum requirement of reenlisting for a minimum of 3 years to qualify for payment of the SRB. Had the applicant been informed that he would not have been eligible to qualify for an SRB by reenlisting for only 2 years, he could have requested an exception to the RCP to be reenlisted for a period of 3 years so as to qualify for payment of the SRB. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199

    Original file (BC-2005-01199.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012761

    Original file (20100012761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section III of this annex states he would receive the first payment of this bonus at the rate of 50 percent upon completion of initial active duty for training (IADT) and award of the MOS for which enlisted and he would receive a second and final payment of the remainder of the bonus on the 36th month of his enlistment anniversary. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted under the AF program while a junior in high school which he was not authorized to do under this program. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605622C070209

    Original file (9605622C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 12 December 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 9 January 1996 for a period of 6 years instead of 4 years. It opined, in effect, that a SRB-1B had been authorized for the applicant’s MOS on 1 January 1996 and had the applicant applied for a waiver to reenlist under his 90-day window, an exception would have been granted. It goes on to state that personnel are not authorized to reenlist outside of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802

    Original file (BC-2005-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03397

    Original file (BC-2004-03397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He graduated from technical training school on 7 April 2004, and after inquiring about reenlisting, was informed the rules had changed and he was not eligible to reenlist, because he was not within three months of his date of separation (DOS). His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E _________________________________________________________________ ADDITONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reviewed a similar application and provided an advisory which indicates in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606357C070209

    Original file (9606357C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by amending his 28 November 1995 reenlistment contract to show that he reenlisted on 4 December 1995 with entitlement to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)-2B. The supporting statements from the applicant’s chain of command (lieutenant colonel to lieutenant general) all attest that the applicant was scheduled to reenlist on 22 December 1995 and that because he was hand-picked for deployment to Hungary, he was advised to reenlist...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00609

    Original file (BC-2005-00609.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPAE states the applicant is not eligible to receive the SRB that was in effect when he was approved for retraining because he did not reenlist within 30 days of the notice of termination of the SRB for that career field. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he never received official notification of the requirement to reenlist within 30 days of...