Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was experiencing personal problems at the time of his service because his mother was sick and his wife was an addict. He further states that he spoke to his captain several times regarding his hardship and received no help. It was just too much for him to deal with at the time.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted at Fort Hamilton, New York, on 18 September 1979, for a period of 4 years and training as a wire systems installer/operator.
He completed his basic combat training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and was transferred to Fort Gordon, Georgia, for his advanced individual training (AIT). He completed his AIT and received orders transferring him to Fort Lewis, Washington, with a report date of 2 January 1980.
On 11 January 1980, while assigned to the replacement detachment, the applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) and remained absent until 1 February 1980. The record is silent as to any punishment imposed for that offense.
On 7 March 1980, he again went AWOL and remained absent until he was arrested and confined by civil authorities at Riker's Island Correctional Facility, New York, on 7 February 1982.
The applicant was returned to military control on 12 January 1983 and again went AWOL on 13 January 1983. He was again apprehended by civil authorities for robbery on 1 March 1983 and received a 2 to 6 year sentence. He was confined at the Lincoln Correctional Facility in Manhattan, New York.
He was returned to military control at Fort Dix, New Jersey, on 2 January 1985 and again went AWOL on 3 January 1985. He remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Dix on 14 January 1985.
Charges were preferred against him on 16 January 1985 for being AWOL from 7 April 1980 to 12 January 1983, from 13 January 1983 to 2 January 1985 and from 3 January to 14 January 1985.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He acknowledged that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge. He further declined to submit a statement or explanation in his own behalf and also declined a separation medical examination.
The appropriate authority approved his request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions while on excess leave, on 28 February 1985, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 6 months and 15 days of total active service and had approximately 1,787 days of lost time due to AWOL and civil confinement.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever sought the assistance of his chain of command or ever applied for a hardship discharge or compassionate reassignment.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by courtmartial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absence as well as his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
4. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions and finds that they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief under the circumstances. While he may have had personal problems, there is no evidence that he attempted to resolve the problems through his chain of command, prior to going AWOL. Additionally, after going AWOL, he resorted to criminal misconduct.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jlp ___ __mvt___ __ao____ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002079164 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2003/03/18 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1985/02/28 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075164C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 16 January 1985, he went AWOL and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Bragg on 26 February 1985, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offense.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002213
The applicant provides: * A summary of benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs dated 13 January 2011 * Orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective 30 September 2003 * A memorandum from the Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 16 September 2003, indicating he was being discharged without severance pay * His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 9 January 2001 * His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020734
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 19 November 1987 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068916C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020831
On 23 May 1985, the applicant was discharged accordingly. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025184
On 26 April 1985, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 15 May 1985, he was accordingly discharged. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010053
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 17 May 1985, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 29 May 1985 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020971
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 10 June 1983, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, if applicable, and the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014116
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The appropriate authority approved her request for discharge on 21 September 1987 and directed her discharge under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, on 3 November 1987, she was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008487
There is no evidence he was returned to the training command. He was due to be released in November of 2013, after period of over 27 years. There is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge.