Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002213
Original file (20110002213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 1 August 2011 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002213 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states that he was required to have his discharge upgraded in 1985 when he enlisted in the Army National Guard.  He further states that he was discharged from the Army National Guard in 1987 and reentered in 1992.  In 1995 he served in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status until he was discharged due to a physical disability in 2003.  He continues by stating he thought everything was good to go because he was allowed to reenlist and start his military career all over again with a clean slate.  However, he was notified by the Department of Veterans Affairs in 2011 that his service from 1978 to 1980 was dishonorable.

3.  The applicant provides:

* A summary of benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs dated 
13 January 2011
* Orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective    30 September 2003
* A memorandum from the Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 
16 September 2003, indicating he was being discharged without severance pay


* His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 9 January 2001
* His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 1 October 2001
* His National Guard Retirement Points History Statement
* Two Leave and Earnings Statements 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records, though somewhat incomplete, show he was born on 23 December 1958 and enlisted in the Regular Army in Syracuse, New York on
6 November 1978 for a period of 4 years, training under the airborne enlistment option, assignment to the 82d Airborne Division, and a cash enlistment bonus.

2.  He completed basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman and airborne training at Fort Benning, Georgia before being transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina for assignment to the 82d Airborne Division on 23 March 1979.

3.  The applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) from 10 July to 12 July 1979 and from 16 July 1979 to 3 February 1980.

4.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge are not present in the available records.  However, his records do contain a duly authenticated DD Form 214 showing that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 3 April 1980 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He completed 10 months and 7 days of active service and he had 205 days of lost time due to being AWOL.  He was given reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes of 3, 3B, and 3C (disqualified for reenlistment, but the disqualification is waivable).

5.  There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

6.  Although the enlistment contract is not contained in the available records, his records contain an NGB Form 22 showing the applicant served in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 29 October 1985 until he was honorably discharged on 1 July 1987.  He had served 1 year, 10 months, and 23 days and he was issued an RE Code of “3.”



7.  On 28 October 1992, he again enlisted in the NYARNG with a medical waiver for a period of 3 years.

8.  On 26 September 1995, he entered active duty in the AGR Program and was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 24 April 1999.  He served on active duty until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 9 January 2001 and he was assigned an RE Code of “1.”

9.  On 1 October 2001 he was honorably discharged from the NYARNG and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  He was assigned an RE Code of “3.”

10.  Although the proceedings are not present in the available records, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency published orders on 16 September 2003 which discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 30 September 2003 without severance pay.

11.  The summary of benefits provided by the applicant shows he received a combined service-connected disability rating of 100%.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after charges have been preferred.  A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser-included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

13.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army 


Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid a trial by court-martial was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons were appropriate under the circumstances.

2.  The applicant’s contentions that his discharge was upgraded has been noted and appear to lack merit.  While the available records do not contain his 1985 contract showing how he enlisted in the NYARNG, if his discharge had been upgraded he would have been issued a new DD Form 214 and discharge certificate by authority of the ADRB or this Board.  However, there is no evidence to show that either board did so.

3.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that his discharge was upgraded.

4.  While his records do show that he served in the NYARNG after being discharged under other than honorable conditions and some of that service was on active duty, his records contain no explanation as to how he was allowed to enlist in 1985.  However, since he had been given RE codes of 3, 3B, and 3C, his disqualifications were waivable, and it appears the NYARNG approved a waiver to allow him to enlist.  Therefore, absent credible evidence to show that his discharge as in fact upgraded as he claims, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002213



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002213



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011217

    Original file (20100011217.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's enlistment packet contains a DA Form 3286-40 (Statements for Enlistment - Delayed Entry Program) showing he chose the U.S. Army Airborne enlistment option with a cash bonus of $2,500 and school course 11B1O - Infantryman. Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Reenlistment Program), in effect at the time, provided the RE codes for use in item 27 of DD Form 214. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge and change of his RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028487

    Original file (20100028487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 November 1981, he was released from active duty after the completion of his required active service with a general discharge under honorable conditions. It notes that an SPD code of "LBK" is the appropriate code when enlisted Soldiers are being involuntarily discharged upon completion of their required active service because they are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment at the time of separation. His SPD code LBK indicates he was involuntarily released from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006890

    Original file (20070006890.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070006890 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021192

    Original file (20120021192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct date of birth (DOB), date entered active duty, and reentry eligibility (RE) code. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his DOB as 24 November 1957, Date Entered Active Duty as 10 December 1978, that he was issued an RE code other than "RE-3" and "RE-3B", and an upgrade of his discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DOB is 24 November 1957 and that his DOB is correctly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015949

    Original file (20130015949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 January 1992 to show in: * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – * Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar * item 14 (Military Education), in effect: * Advanced Food Service Specialist, 2 weeks, 1983 * Jungle Operations Training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009942

    Original file (20060009942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his 4 July 1987 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected by adding the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA) and all other awards to which he is entitled; that Item 14 (Military Education) be corrected by adding the following courses: Army War College; Naval War College; Command & General Staff College; Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007651

    Original file (20080007651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from RE-3B to RE-1 in order to reenter the Army. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Form 214, dated 22 December 1983. b. Waiver Packet, dated 4 October 1983, for Disqualification for Enlistment/Reenlistment in the Regular Army for In-Service Personnel. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003972

    Original file (20070003972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 1986, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him violating a lawful general regulation by operating a government vehicle at an excessive speed. He enlisted in the NYARNG on 7 April 1994 for a period of 3 years and on 9 November 1995, he was granted a waiver to remain in the NYARNG after it was determined that his enlistment was fraudulent because he had concealed his arrest record. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004526C070206

    Original file (20050004526C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 July 1973, the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty and transferred to NYARNG to complete his remaining service obligation. These orders further show that the applicant was to be discharged from the Regular Army on 8 February 1980. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an effective date of 8 February 1980, shows that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and that his character of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007921

    Original file (AR20140007921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his characterization of service and correction of his date of discharge. His DD Form 214 shows he had 1 year, 5 months, and 13 days of creditable active service, 77 days of lost time, and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. b. Paragraph 3-7b states that a general discharge (GD) is a separation under honorable conditions issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not so meritorious as to warrant an honorable discharge; and c. Chapter...