| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he was discharged by reason of physical disability or that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he suffered from arthritis as a child and that he was hospitalized with swelling in his knees, hands and ankles while in the military. He states that the pain was unbearable and in spite of his pain he was ordered to mop the hospital floors. He notes that he was unable to do any type of work and when he informed hospital officials that he could not work, he was ordered back to duty. He states that he still requires medical care for his arthritis but that it is somewhat under control and he would be willing to serve the remainder of his military service in order to receive a medical or honorable discharge. Beyond his self-authored statement, the applicant submits no evidence in support of his request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
In June 1990 this Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his undesirable discharge to honorable. Incorporated herein by reference are military records that were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's consideration of that request (AC89-09856).
The applicant's enlistment physical examination, conducted in June 1961, notes that the applicant's health was good and made no reference to any childhood symptoms of arthritis. The applicant entered active duty 29 June 1961. On
3 July 1961 he was seen in the orthopedic clinic at Ireland Army Hospital for a painful right knee and painful swollen right ankle. The examining physician noted that there was redness, heat, and tenderness in the applicant's right knee. However, there is no indication the applicant was hospitalized or that he reported any subsequent complaints of pain in his knees or ankles.
On 25, 26, and 27 July 1961, the applicant sought medical attention for complaints of lower back pain. Examinations were negative, with no spasm or tenderness, and "straight leg raising" was normal. The applicant was returned to duty.
On 7 August 1961 the applicant commenced a series of AWOL (absent without leave) periods, which ultimately resulted in his conviction by two special courts-martial, and a recommendation that he be administratively separated from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. He was separated with an under other than honorable characterization of service on
18 May 1962 and issued an undesirable discharge certificate.
The applicant indicated on his 4 May 1962 separation physical examination that his medical condition was "fair." However, he did not indicate that he was suffering from, or had suffered from, arthritis or any other problems with his joints, knees, or ankles. The examining physician found him medically qualified for separation.
Army Regulation 635-40 states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a soldier is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement, indicates that the applicant is fit for duty. Disability processing would only be appropriate if there were evidence which establishes that the soldier was, in fact, physically unable to perform adequately the duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating for a period of time because of disability. There must be a causative relationship between the less than adequate duty performance and the unfitting medical condition or conditions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any which would serve as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision concerning his request to upgrade his discharge to honorable.
2. There is no evidence the applicant suffered from arthritis prior to his entry on active duty and no evidence that such a condition prevented him from performing his military duties. Although the applicant may have been treated for medical conditions while on active duty there is no evidence that those conditions prevented him from performing his duties. The evidence of record indicates he did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing. Therefore, there is no basis for physical disability retirement or separation.
3. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__CLG__ __RKS __ __DPH __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002077851 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021031 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096854C070212
The applicant requests physical disability retirement with a disability rating of 100 percent. A 30 August 1999 report of medical examination depicts the applicant's various medical conditions, to include bilateral weakness in arms/forearms, degenerative joint disease to his back, knees, and ankles, and bilateral ankle pain. The applicant had pain to his back, knee, right ankle, and left wrist, as a result of his various injuries; consequently, the PEB determined that he be rated as 20...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01097
VA (20050523) – All Effective Date 20010704* Condition Posttraumatic Arthritis, Right Ankle Ganglion Cyst, Right Wrist Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation w/Instability, Right Wrist Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation…, Left Wrist Hypertension Excision, Nevus, Residual Scar… Not Service Connected No VA Entry Sinusitis Tonsillitis Paresthesias of Gingiva… Vitreous Floaters DDD, L5-S1; Schmorl’s...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00481
All evidence considered, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% for the chronic, painful left foot and ankle condition. Other PEB Conditions . Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01822
Bilateral knee degenerative joint disease (DJD), left greater than right and left ankle pain were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Degenerative Arthritis of the Knees500310%Degenerative Joint Disease, R Knee5010-526010%20040925Degenerative Joint Disease, L Knee5010-526010%20040925Left Ankle PainNot UnfittingLeft Ankle Sprain5299-52700%20040925Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 6 Rating: 10%Combined:...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01106
The PEB adjudicated the right-shoulder condition as unfitting rated at 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD);the bilateral knee, right-ankle and lumbar diagnoseswere consolidated as a single unfitting condition coded analogously to 5003 (degenerative arthritis)rated at 10%, with likely application ofthe U.S. Army Physical Disability Agencypain policy and/or AR 635-40 (B.24.f). There are multiple STR entries reflecting normal or nearly normal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008282
(4) On 26 March 2004, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) considered his bilateral knee pain due to patellofemoral arthritis unfit, existed prior to service and permanently aggravated by an LOD injury on 12 August 2003. (4) His orders show he has 20 years of service and his DD Form 214 states he was discharged with severance pay. The evidence of record shows he later submitted a statement requesting his medical board paperwork be reevaluated to increase his disability rating to 40% for...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01561
SEPARATION DATE: 20041006 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB adjudicated the chronic multiple joint arthralgias as unfitting with a disability rating of 0%, coded 5099-5002, analogous to rheumatoid arthritis. In the matter of the chronic multiple joint arthralgias condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 40%, coded 5099-5025 IAW VASRD §4.71a.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00443
The Board noted that the PEB combined the bilateral knee and ankle pain as a single unfitting condition coded 5003 and rated 10%. The Board first considered the knees and ankles to determine if they were separately unfitting and, if so, the appropriate rating. At the VA C&P examination, 4 months after separation, the CI reported bilateral ankle pain and intermittent swelling.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019401
The applicant states his final disability rating needs to be corrected to include the two secondary conditions as stated by military medical doctors in both of his post-Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) medical examinations. The USAPDA recommended no change in the applicant's final Army disability percentage; however, the applicant's 7 December 2010 PEB Proceedings should be amended to reflect that his left wrist pain is unfitting and rated at 10 percent. As a result, the Board...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00068
RECOMMENDATIONS: Sergeant B---'s current medical condition of chronic psoriasis precludes him from continuation on active duty; and he is, therefore, going to be referred to the Physical Evaluation Board for further evaluation and disposition. No other medical conditions were documented; REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: Musculoskeletal - the patient complains of chronic knee pain. Other Conditions.