| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Tracey L. Pinson | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam in May 1968 and was never awarded the Purple Heart. In support of his request he submits copies of his medical records describing his wound, a letter from another soldier attesting to the circumstances of his injury, a photo of himself taken after he was wounded, and his DD Form 214 indicating he received the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in to the Army of the United States on 12 July 1967, for a period of 2 years. He successfully completed basic training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and advanced individual training at Fort Polk, Louisiana.
5. He served in Vietnam from January 1968 to January 1969.
6. The applicant’s 1969 separation physical indicates he received a shrapnel fragment wound to the right jaw. There are no additional medical files in his available records, and no other information concerning his injury.
7. The applicant was discharged on 11 July 1969, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, for expiration term of service. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he had
2 years of creditable service, and had been awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal, and two overseas bars.
8. The applicant’s name is not among those listed as combat casualties during the Vietnam War.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-10 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal.
11. By virtue of his service in Vietnam he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and 4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal reflecting his participation in 4 campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, Phase IV, and Phase V, and the TET Counteroffensive).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence to justify award of the Purple Heart. While there is evidence that the applicant was treated for a shrapnel wound, there is no evidence of record that his wound was incurred as a result of enemy action.
2. By virtue of his service in Vietnam he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit CItation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and 4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal reflecting his participation in 4 campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, Phase IV, and Phase V, and the TET Counteroffensive). The applicant’s records should be corrected to reflect these awards.
3. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 11 July 1969. There is no evidence his commander ever disqualified him from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying him the award. In view the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award him that decoration for the period 12 July 1967 through
11 July 1969.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant:
a. the Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 July 1967 through 11 July 1969, and
b. the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation , the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and
4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__KAK __ __MHM__ __TLP __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Karol A. Kennedy____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002077557 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030128 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078064C070215
This Board then denied the applicant’s request informing him that he had not exhausted his available administrative remedies. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067917C070402
There were no medical records available to the Board or submitted by the applicant. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal on 11 April 1969, and the Board finds no basis to deny him the award for the period 14 April 1967 through 11 April 1969. The applicant’s April 1969, separation document should be corrected to show the award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 April 1967 through 11 April 1969, the Meritorious Unit Commendation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072264C070403
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 provides, in pertinent part, that the 2 nd Battalion, 502nd, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 19 July 1968 through 14 May 1969, by Department of the Army General Orders 48, 1971, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class Unit Citation for the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders 48, 1971. It would therefore be appropriate to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029253
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the Purple Heart. The applicant states he received a Purple Heart for being wounded in 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Purple Heart, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073696C070403
The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Purple Heart, and the Expert Badge (Rifle M14). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Since the record is also devoid of any evidence of disciplinary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030013
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him: (1) the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 19 January 1969 and (2)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075356C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Purple Heart and it should be entered on his separation document. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part that a bronze service star, based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation, will be worn on the appropriate service medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart by virtue of the wounds he suffered in Vietnam on 28...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004389
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for injuries incurred on 2 March 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071529C070402
His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Expert Badge (M-14). This document shows that at the time of the applicant’s assignment his unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 January through 31 December 1969 by Department of the Army General Order 2, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019053
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 29 March 1967 through 15 April 1969, ending with a period of active service of less than 3 years but more...