| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| M r. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Purple Heart for injuries he received after stepping on a U.S. landmine in Vietnam. He has read recently where other soldiers were given the Purple Heart for injuries caused by friendly fire and believes his injuries should be similarly recognized.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered the Regular Army on 16 January 1967. He completed training as an Explosive Ordnance Specialist and achieved the rank of specialist five. He served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 2 December 1968 through 30 August 1969, while assigned to the 85th and 42nd Ordnance Detachments. On 6 May 1970, he was retired for permanent physical disability, his character of service was honorable, and he had completed a total of 3 years, 3 months and 21 days of creditable active service. His separation document shows no lost time.
5. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Expert Badge (M-14).
6. On 26 November 1969, the applicant was awarded the Soldier's Medal for heroism for actions he took on 5 August 1969 in the RVN. He entered a landmine area to assist a wounded soldier and was then himself critically wounded. The Soldier's Medal is not reflected on his DD Form 214; however, a copy of the General Order 4239, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, on 26 November 1969, authorizing the award, is contained in his records.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart to individuals wounded or killed as a result of “friendly fire” in the “heat of battle” as long as the “friendly” projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.
8. The same regulation provides that a bronze service star, based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation, will be worn on the appropriate service medal. It shows the applicant was present for three campaigns: Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI; Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 and Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 and is entitled to three Bronze Service Stars.
9. The same regulation provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows that at the time of the applicant’s assignment his unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 January through 31 December 1969 by Department of the Army General Order 2, dated 1971, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Order 8, dated 1974.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. As described in the narrative for his Soldier's Medal, the applicant was wounded by stepping on a landmine originally deployed by U.S. Forces. If the applicant had stepped on the landmine through his own negligence the incident would be considered an accident and he would not be entitled to the Purple Heart. However, the applicant's records reveal his injuries were incurred while performing a heroic lifesaving act. A landmine is armed and released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment. Therefore, the evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart by virtue of the wounds he suffered in Vietnam on 5 August 1969. He is also entitled to have the award shown on his DD Form 214.
2. Similarly, the applicant’s service was meritorious, as evidenced by his promotion to specialist five and award of the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service. Since the record is also devoid of any evidence of disciplinary action taken against him, it would appear that the absence of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of his service from 16 January 1967 through 6 May 1970 was an oversight and he is entitled to the award and to a correction of his records to show this award.
3. The applicant was assigned to a unit when it was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of these unit awards.
4. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to three Bronze Service Stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam on 5 August 1969; and
b. showing he was awarded the Soldier's Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, three bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
BOARD VOTE:
____rjw__ ____rwa_ ___jtm__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__________Raymond J. Wagner_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002071529 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021010 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003718
The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, 67th Evacuation Hospital, General Order Number 157, dated 15 July 1970, as new evidence which warrants consideration by the Board. This order shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 July 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006698
The DA Form 20 shows that the applicant: a. served in Vietnam with the 446th Transportation Company from 9 March 1968 through 17 September 1968; b. served during one campaign period; c. sustained a wound (fractured left foot on 26 June 1968); and d. his awards are the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar for both the M-14 and M-16 rifles. In addition to the awards...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077901C070215
There were no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart. In his reply to the applicant, the MC wrote, "The Purple Heart is awarded to those persons who were wounded or injured as a direct result of hostile action of an enemy of the United States. c. by amending the applicant's DD Form 214, block 24, to read as follows: "National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073783C070403
The applicant states, in effect, that at the time of his injury, “friendly fire” incidents did not qualify for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314
Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004683C070205
The Unit Orders the applicant provides show, in pertinent part, that SP5 R_____ was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds he received in connection with military operations against a hostile force on 2 July 1969 and that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroism on that same date (i.e., 2 July 1969). Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013986
Although the applicant was wounded by a piece of shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011097
The applicant, in two applications, requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart and that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Additionally, he states that in any case, based on paragraph 2-8b of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), he believes he qualifies for the Purple Heart due to enemy action or friendly fire. The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Purple Heart and that his military records should be corrected to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084996C070212
There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), of the DA Form 20, showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show these awards as authorized awards because they were awarded to his unit after he had been released from active duty. c. amending the applicant's DD Form 214, Block 24, to correct errors and to include other awards and to read as follows: Purple Heart; Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal; Vietnam Service Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017637
The applicant requests correction of: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device * BSM * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * two Air Medals * Purple Heart b. his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) to show he completed the Combat Leaders Course. There are no orders for award of any Air Medals in his available records. His unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of...