| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Ms. Yalonda Maldonado | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he deserves the Purple Heart for a wound he received while stationed in Vietnam, which was treated at the 12th Evacuation Hospital. In support of his request the applicant submits a copy of his medical treatment at the emergency room at the 12th Evacuation Hospital.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 12 October 1967, he was inducted into the Army of the United States for a period of 2 years. He served in Vietnam from March 1968 to March 1969.
5. Medical service records indicate that on 5 December 1968 he was treated at the 12th Evacuation Hospital for a minor fragment wound of the right parietal area and returned to his unit. The source of the wound is not identified.
6. The applicant’s name is not among those listed as combat casualties during the Vietnam War.
7. On 12 September 1969, his separation physical cleared him for separation.
8. On 10 October 1969, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, for expiration term of service. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he had 2 years of creditable service, and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal.
9. In June 1971, the Department of Veterans Affairs established service connected disability for residual shell fragment wound of the right parietal, which was non compensable in degree, however based upon sound and accepted medical principles and with reasonable doubt in favor of the applicant, his condition was rated at more that 0 percent but less than10 percent.
10. In October 1984, the applicant applied to this Board for award of the Purple Heart. His request was forwarded to Awards Branch at the U.S. Total Personnel Command, formerly the Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN) who had the authority to administratively correct his records. In an attempt to correct his records Awards Branch wrote to the applicant requesting evidence he might have which would establish his eligibility for the award, however no response was received. This Board then denied the applicant’s request informing him that he had not exhausted his available administrative remedies.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-10 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal.
13. By virtue of his service in Vietnam he is entitled to the Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and 4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal reflecting his participation in 4 campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV, Phase V, Phase VI, and TET Counteroffensive).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence to justify award of the Purple Heart. While there is evidence that the applicant was treated for a superficial shrapnel wound, there is no evidence of record that his wound was incurred as a result of enemy actions.
2. By virtue of his service in Vietnam he is should be awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and 4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal reflecting his participation in 4 campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV, Phase V, Phase VI, and TET Counteroffensive).
3. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 10 October 1969. There is no evidence his commander ever disqualified him from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying him the award. In view the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award him that decoration for the period 12 October 1967 through
10 October 1969.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 October 1967 through 10 October 1969, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and 4 bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__WTM__ __CJP __ ___YM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Walter T. Morrison____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002078064 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030130 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010484
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1968, in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003192
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal. The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in the RVN on 17 August 1968 * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding to his DD Form 214 the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073799C070403
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records, which show that he was awarded the CIB or the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart by virtue of the wounds he suffered in Vietnam on 25 April 1969, as authenticated by his DA Form 20. As such, it would appear that the absence of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period of his service from 12 December 1967 through 3 October 1969 was in error and he is entitled to its...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077557C070215
The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam in May 1968 and was never awarded the Purple Heart. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he had 2 years of creditable service, and had been awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal, and two overseas bars. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017092
Item 25 (Selected Administrative Data) of this form shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart by 12th Evacuation Hospital, General Order 234, dated 6 October 1968. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013729
Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), shows during his service with the 2nd Battalion, 12th Artillery, this unit was cited for awards of the: * Valorous Unit Award, for service from 1 May to 29 June 1970, based on DAGO Number 43, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for service from 21 February 1970 to 28 February 1971, based on DAGO Number 42, dated 1972 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009316
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 27 January 1967 in the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014027
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 7 August...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007537
Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected by correcting his SSN on the award orders for the Purple Heart and Air Medal and adding the Army Commendation Medal and Combat Infantryman Badge to his DD Form 214. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following pertinent notations: a. block 29 (Qualification in Arms), qualification as a first class [sharpshooter] machine gunner with the M-60 machine gun; a sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle; and a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010269
The citation reads "For wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 11 February 1968." Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form: * Purple Heart * Valorous Unit Award * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...