Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010942C070208
Original file (20040010942C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          28 July 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040010942


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William Powers                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Larry Bergquist               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James Gunlicks                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214
(Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August
1975 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam
Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Vietnam Service
Medal with two or three bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit
Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Valorous Unit Award.
He requests that he be awarded all awards and decorations to which he may
be entitled to for his service in Japan, Korea, Germany, and Vietnam.  He
also requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show marksmanship
qualification badges with the Carbine Bar, the Rifle Bar, the “LMG” Bar,
the Pistol Bar, the Shotgun Bar, the “SMG” Bar, and the “HMG” Bar.

2.  The applicant states that these items were left off of his discharge
document upon leaving all foreign duty assignments, the Vietnam War, and
the Army.

3.  The applicant provides six DD Forms 214; a letter, dated 26 November
2004, from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri;
orders for the Army Commendation Medal, and numerous service personnel
records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged errors which occurred
on
31 August 1975.  The application submitted in this case is dated 6 December
2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 11 February 1954, served as
a military policeman, and was released from active duty on 1 February 1956.
 He enlisted on 15 January 1957 and remained on active duty through
continuous reenlistments.  He served in Japan from 3 July 1959 to 18
September 1962.  He was assigned to the 8th Radio Research Unit in Vietnam
from 16 December 1964 to 14 December 1965.  He served in Germany from 10
July 1968 to 9 June 1971 and served in Korea from 29 July 1973 to 28 July
1974.  On 31 August 1975, the applicant retired in the rank of sergeant
first class.
4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 August 1975 shows
the Good Conduct Medal (6th award), the National Defense Service Medal with
First Oak Leaf Cluster, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal as
authorized awards.

5.  Department of the Army U.S. Army Security Agency General Orders Number
5, dated 12 January 1976, show the applicant received the Army Commendation
Medal for meritorious service during the period 21 July 1974 to 31 August
1975.

6.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units
serving in Vietnam.  This document shows the applicant's unit was not cited
for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class
Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation, or the Valorous Unit Award
while he was assigned to it.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows the applicant’s unit was
cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the
period November 1964 to June 1966 based on Department of the Army General
Orders Number 17, dated 1968.

8.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

9.  Item 28 (Qualification in Arms) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted
Qualification Record) shows he fired familiarization courses for the
carbine rifle, the “LMG,” the shotgun, the “SMG,” and the “HMG.”  There is
no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that
he qualified for award of the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with these
weapons.

10.  Item 28 on the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows he qualified marksman with
the M1 rifle and completed the weapon qualification course with the .45
caliber pistol.  However, the degree in which he qualified with this pistol
is unknown.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-200 provides in pertinent part that the Republic
of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation is awarded
by the Vietnamese Government as a unit award for meritorious service.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) in pertinent part,
authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for
each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that
authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service
medal.
13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the
Presidential Unit Citation is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action.
A unit must display such gallantry, determination and esprit de corps in
accomplishing its mission as would warrant award of the Distinguished
Service Cross to an individual.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the
Valorous Unit Award to units of the Armed Forces of the United States for
extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy of the United States
while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing
foreign force or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an
armed conflict in which the United States is not a belligerent party for
actions occurring on or after 3 August 1963.  This award requires a lesser
degree of gallantry, determination, and esprit de corps than required for
the Presidential Unit Citation.

15.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Army of
Occupation Medal is awarded for service of thirty consecutive days at a
normal post of duty in a qualifying location.  Personnel at a qualifying
location as an inspector, courier, escort, temporary or detached duty are
precluded from eligibility.  Qualifying service in Japan included service
in the Japanese home islands, the Ryukyu Islands and the Bonin-Volcano
Islands between 3 September 1945 and 27 April 1952.  Service between 3
September 1945 and
2 March 1946 is qualifying only if the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal was
earned prior to 3 September 1945.  For award of the Army of Occupation
Medal with Germany Clasp, qualifying service must have occurred between 9
May 1945 and 5 May 1955 and the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign
Medal must have been awarded prior to 9 May 1945.

16.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Korean Service
Medal.  In pertinent part, the regulation states that the Korean Service
Medal is awarded for qualifying service in the theater of operations
between 27 June 1950 and
27 July 1954.

17.  Army Human Resources Command Message (Date Time Group 9 February 2004)
published implementing instructions for award of the Korea Defense Service
Medal.  This message specified criteria for the award of the Korea Defense
Service Medal as follows:  a) service members of the armed forces must have
served in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954
through a future date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense;  b) the
area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the Republic of Korea, and
the contiguous water out to 12 nautical miles, and all air spaces above the
land and water areas;  c) service members must have been mobilized with
units or assigned or attached to units operating in the area of eligibility
and have been physically deployed in the area of eligibility for 30
consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days.

18.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, sets forth requirements
for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification
badge is awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual has
qualified in a prescribed record course, and an appropriate bar is
furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.
The qualification badges are in three classes:  Expert, Sharpshooter, and
Marksman.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows the applicant's unit was
not cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal
First Class Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation or the Valorous
Unit Award while he was assigned to it.  Therefore, there is insufficient
evidence on which to base award of these unit awards.

3.  The applicant's unit was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit
Commendation while he was assigned to it.

4.  Since the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment
in Vietnam, he is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two
bronze service stars, not the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze
service stars.

5.  The applicant did not serve a period of qualifying service for award of
the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp, the Army of Occupation Medal
with Germany Clasp or the Korean Service Medal.

6.  Evidence of record shows the applicant served a period of qualifying
service for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal.

7.  Records show the applicant fired familiarization courses with the
carbine rifle, the “LMG,” the shotgun, the “SMG,” and the “HMG.”  There is
no evidence which shows he completed a weapon qualification course which
resulted in award of a Marksmanship Qualification Badge with any of the
above mentioned weapons.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on
which to base any award of a Marksmanship Qualification Badge for these
weapons.

8.  Records show the applicant qualified marksman with the M1 rifle.
Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Marksman Marksmanship
Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

9.  Records show the applicant completed the weapon qualification course
with the .45 caliber pistol.  However, since, the degree in which the
applicant qualified with the .45 caliber pistol is unknown, it would
equitable to award him the minimum or least degree of this marksmanship
qualification badge.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to
show the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

WP_____  LB______  JG______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form
214 for the period ending
31 August 1975 to show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, the
Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Meritorious Unit
Commendation, the Korea Defense Service Medal, the Marksman Marksmanship
Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship
Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit
Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award, the Army
of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp, the Army of Occupation Medal with
Germany Clasp, the Korean Service Medal, the Marksmanship Qualification
Badge with Carbine Bar, the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with “LMG”
Bar, the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with


Shotgun Bar, the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with “SMG” Bar, and the
Marksmanship Qualification Badge with “HMG” Bar.




            ___William Powers_____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040010942                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050728                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011289

    Original file (20120011289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows he was awarded the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) 13. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 26 February 1969 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005372

    Original file (20110005372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24A (Service Record), covering the period of service from 7 December 1948 through 16 October 1951, shows in: a. section 7 (Combat Record): Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) Intervention, First United Nations (UN) Counteroffensive, and CCF Spring Offensive campaigns; b. section 9 (Remarks - Administrative): he was discharged on 16 October 1951, his character and efficiency were both rated as "excellent," and he had 34 months and 10 days of continuous service credit toward...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011172

    Original file (20110011172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He adds his military records should show the following awards: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) [2nd Award] * Meritorious Service Medal (awarded upon retirement) * Army Commendation Medal (4th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) [2nd Award] * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation [2nd Award] * Korea...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002824

    Original file (20070002824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of the Vietnam Service Medal for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Records show that the applicant served in four campaigns in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 24 of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 October 1970, the Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (5th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006064

    Original file (20120006064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows that during his service with: a. The evidence of record shows he served in Lebanon from 1 August to 5 October 1958, a qualifying period for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * issuing an appropriate document listing the FSM's following authorized awards: * Bronze Star Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078629C070215

    Original file (2002078629C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 18 March 1961, shows entitlement to the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp based on service in Berlin. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. His DD Form 214, with an effective date of 18 March 1961, shows entitlement to award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp based on his service in Berlin.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005432

    Original file (20070005432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam. Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014355

    Original file (20100014355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Parachutist Badge, one overseas service bar, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. General orders awarded the applicant’s unit of assignment the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020406

    Original file (20140020406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1980 by adding the following awards: * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar (M-1 Rifle) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) (shown as AR-16) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar (.45 Caliber) * Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar * Second Award, Oak Leaf Cluster (no award identified) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017002

    Original file (20090017002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) and correct his records to show this award.