Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021177
Original file (20130021177.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    31 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130021177 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M16 Rifle and 81mm Mortar bars.

2.  The applicant states he desires to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show he qualified expert with the M16 rifle and 81mm mortar.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 27 November 1967.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and his advanced individual training as an infantry indirect fire crewman at Fort McClellan, Alabama before being transferred to Vietnam on 16 May 1968 for assignment to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division. 

3.  He was promoted to the rank of sergeant on 13 March 1969, participated in four campaigns, and departed Vietnam on 12 May 1969 for assignment to Fort Meade, Maryland where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 26 November 1969.  He had served 2 years of active service.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with rifle bar (M14), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Vietnam Service Medal, Air Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and Bronze Star Medal.

4.  A review of his official records shows that the applicant qualified “Expert” with the M16 rifle during a familiarization course on 6 March 1968.  He qualified “Expert” with the 81mm mortar in a train-fire course on 5 April 1968.

5.  His records also show that he had “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree – Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman -- in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course.  A train-fire course is a record course; however, a familiarization course is not a qualification course that results in award of a marksmanship badge.  An appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  It shows that the applicant's unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star, based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B will be worn on the appropriate service medal.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant qualified expert with the 81mm mortar and is entitled to have that qualification recorded on his DD Form 214.  However, he only qualified during a familiarization course with the M16 rifle and is not entitled to have that qualification added to his DD Form 214.

2.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 27 November 1967 through 26 November 1969.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.

3.  The evidence suggests that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of his unit commanders.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should be awarded the AGCM at this time. 

4.  The applicant served in four campaigns and is entitled to wear four bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and have them added to his DD Form 214.

5.  Additionally, the applicant’s unit was awarded the VUA, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have those awards added to his DD Form 214 at this time.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214
* Awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 November 1967 through 26 November 1969
* Adding the awards of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with mortar bar, Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, AGCM (1st Award), VUA, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation to his DD Form 214

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding the award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M16 rifle bar to his DD Form 214.  

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021177





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130021177



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002331

    Original file (20130002331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 8 November 1966 through 25 August 1969 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003525

    Original file (20140003525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 1968. His OMPF includes the following order numbers (#) and letter which shows the applicant earned the following weapons qualifications and awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable service from 30 August 1968 to 21 August 1970; b. amending item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000389

    Original file (20150000389.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 20 that shows in: a. item 22 (MOS) he was awarded PMOS 11C on 20 January 1970; b. item 22 he was awarded PMOS 71B on 15 July 1970; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 12 February to 15 June 1970; d. item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to Company E, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment from 27 February to 15 June 1970 in duty MOS 11C1O; e. item 38 that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022358

    Original file (20130022358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. general orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period August 1968 to August 1969; b. special orders awarded the applicant the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008495

    Original file (20070008495.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Good Conduct Medal (GCM), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with Bronze Service Stars, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar (81mm), the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Campaign Medal, and any awards his unit was authorized, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015026

    Original file (20140015026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service except for the period from 20 October to 8 December 1969 (48 days) when he was in a casual status and between assignments and received "unknown" ratings. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the 1st award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007353

    Original file (20140007353.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars * Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge * Air Medal * Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device 8. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003472

    Original file (20120003472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 November 1987 to show his Silver Star and the Meritorious Service Medal. He participated in seven campaigns during his two tours of duty in Vietnam that entitles him to one silver service star and two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009225

    Original file (20120009225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Air Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 11. Lacking any other derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104355C070208

    Original file (2004104355C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 40 (Wounds), of the applicant's DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, to show that he was wounded in action against a hostile force. The Vietnam Casualty Listing shows that the applicant was wounded in action on 12 June 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 June 1969 and adding...