Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074846C070403
Original file (2002074846C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 26 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074846

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code be changed.

APPLICANT STATES: That he would like to know why he was given an RE code of 3. He would like to go back into the military. He provides his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 March 2002.

On or about 10 April 2002, the applicant apparently made the statement, "Everyone's picking on me because I'm gay" in front of about 30 trainees and three drill sergeants.

On 10 April 2002, the applicant made a sworn statement that he was a homosexual, that he never participated in homosexual acts while in the military, but that he had participated in such acts prior to joining the military.

On 16 April 2002, the applicant underwent a mental status evaluation. He was found to have the mental capacity to understand and participate in proceedings, to be mentally responsible, and to be psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by his command.

On 18 April 2002, the applicant's commander recommended him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexual conduct. He cited the applicant's admission that he was a homosexual as the basis for the recommendation.

On 18 April 2002, the applicant was advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated action. He elected not to make a statement in his own behalf.

On 22 April 2002, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant receive an uncharacterized description of service.

On 29 April 2002, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexual admission. He was given a separation program designator code (SPD) of JRB (involuntary discharge under


the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b for homosexual admission) and an RE code of 3. He had completed 1 month and 11 days of creditable active service and had no lost time.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service but the disqualification is waivable. RE 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD is JRB then an RE code of 4 will be given.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552 governs the correction of military records. Section 1552(a)(2) states that a correction may be made only if the correction is favorable to the person concerned.

Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. Since the applicant was separated for homosexual admission, he should have been given an RE code of 4, a nonwaivable disqualification to reenlistment. He was erroneously given an RE code of 3, a waivable disqualification. However, by statute the Board cannot correct his record to reflect the RE code he should have been given as that correction would not be favorable to him.

3. An individual has the right to apply for a waiver. The applicant may periodically visit his local recruiting station to determine if he should apply for a waiver; however, in light of the reason for his separation he should be aware that it is unlikely a waiver would be approved.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RVO_ __RJW___ ___KYF__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002074846
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/26
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090638C070212

    Original file (2003090638C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the character of the applicant's discharge was changed the underlying basis for the discharge, homosexuality, did not.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006488

    Original file (20090006488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She stated she was requesting to be discharged from the U.S. Army under chapter 15, paragraph 4. On 6 April 1993, the applicant's commander recommended her for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012853

    Original file (20100012853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 18 September 2009, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 15-3b, for homosexual admission. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087168C070212

    Original file (2003087168C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has told me that in order to reenlist, the DD Form 214 must show that my bar to reenlistment has been removed." The applicant states in his self-authored letter to the Board that he was given a Chapter 14 (sic) discharge for admitting to homosexual behavior. The DD Form 214 that the applicant was provided on his discharge date shows AR 635-200, paragraph 15-3B as the Separation Authority, in Block 25; "JRB" as the Separation Code in Block 26; and "4" as the Reentry Code in Block 27; and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004980

    Original file (20090004980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2008, the company commander counseled the applicant concerning the Army's homosexual policy and separation under chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The commander investigated the applicant's sworn statement and confirmed that the homosexual acts did occur.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006518

    Original file (20080006518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 15 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for homosexual conduct. The SPD code of JRB was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200 for homosexual admission. __________ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007517

    Original file (20090007517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She believed she had no option except to get out of the Army with what was happening between her friend's situation and the first sergeant and other Soldiers harassing her. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is a homosexual admission and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b. Although the applicant's discharge proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019671

    Original file (20080019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 3. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE codes. In view of the fact that the applicant did not specifically request a correction to item 12a of his DD Form 214, this error will not be corrected at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015307

    Original file (20090015307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 5 March 1991, the applicant was notified of the proposed action to separate him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality based on his voluntary request for discharge. On 4 June 2004, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011427

    Original file (20060011427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 December 2004, the applicant was released from active duty with an entry level separation with service uncharacterized under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, for homosexual admission. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these...