Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006518
Original file (20080006518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006518 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her Reentry (RE) Code 4 be changed so that she may reenlist in the Army. 

2.  The applicant states that she was young and did not know any better.  She wanted to be with her family and was worried about her grandmother who was diagnosed with a life threatening sickness.  She mentioned to a friend that she could get out of the Army and have a chance to spend time with her grandmother if she was thought to be gay.  She is now very ashamed of what she did and has regretted it ever since.  Most of her happiness was while in the Army and knows it was wrong to lie.  She would like another chance and asks that her RE Code be changed.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.   On 17 May 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  She completed her initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63W (Wheeled Vehicle Repairer).

3.  The applicant's Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty 
(DD Form 214) indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3B, for homosexual admission.  Her character of service is shown as honorable.  She was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of JRB and a RE code of 4.

4.  The administrative discharge packet is not available for review.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 15 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for homosexual conduct.  Paragraph 15-3b applies to those Soldiers who make a homosexual admission.

6.  Army Regulation 601-210 prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of armed forces RE Codes including RA RE codes.  RE 4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  That regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code of JRB was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200 for homosexual admission.  Additionally, Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE Code 4 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers for this reason.






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.   In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.  

2.  The RE Code 4, establishing her ineligibility for enlistment/reenlistment, was correctly entered on her separation document in accordance with governing regulations.

3.  There is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant’s disqualification that established the basis for the RE Code of 4.  While the applicant’s desire to continue in the service to her country is noted, there are no provisions authorizing the change of an RE Code for this purpose.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
















BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





__________ _  X  _______   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006518



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012853

    Original file (20100012853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 18 September 2009, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 15-3b, for homosexual admission. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007517

    Original file (20090007517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She believed she had no option except to get out of the Army with what was happening between her friend's situation and the first sergeant and other Soldiers harassing her. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is a homosexual admission and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b. Although the applicant's discharge proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076659C070215

    Original file (2002076659C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also claims that the reason for her discharge entered on her DD Form 214, dated 17 November 2000, was Homosexual Admission, and this resulted in her being assigned a reentry (RE) code of RE-4. This document confirms that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 5-3b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Admission, and that she was assigned the corresponding SPD and RE codes in accordance with the applicable regulations. In view of the facts of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015373

    Original file (20120015373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status (i.e., had completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty before the date of the initiation of separation action), except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006488

    Original file (20090006488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She stated she was requesting to be discharged from the U.S. Army under chapter 15, paragraph 4. On 6 April 1993, the applicant's commander recommended her for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101465C070208

    Original file (2004101465C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 27 July 2001, shows that the applicant was advised that she would be separated from active service due to chapter 15 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Separations) for homosexual activities. In this case, Army Regulation 635-5-1 shows that the SPD code "JRB" indicates that the separation authority as "Paragraph 15-3B, Army Regulation 635-200" and the narrative reason for the discharge is “Homosexual Admission." Records show that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021339

    Original file (20120021339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 31 December 1985, the separation authority approved the proposed discharge action and directed the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, with a General Discharge Certificate. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004498

    Original file (20140004498 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that effective 20 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004498

    Original file (20140004498.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that effective 20 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006930

    Original file (20080006930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. An SPD code of "JRB" applies to persons discharged for homosexual conduction or admission under the provisions of Chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 4 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals...