| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the Army.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that the $3362.82 debt to the Army based on his being overpaid is unjust, creates a hardship on him and his family, and should be remitted or canceled accordingly. He claims that he made repeated attempts to resolve the overpayment error that resulted in his indebtedness to the Army that went unanswered and he should not have to pay for this mistake.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he is a sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7) in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and that on 2 June 2001, he was released from active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program.
5. In December 2000, while serving on active duty in the AGR and assigned to the Pittsburgh Recruiting Battalion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the applicant was notified, via his December 2000 leave and earnings statement (LES), that he was indebted to the Army in the amount of $3362.82 based on being overpaid.
6. A pay adjustment authorization form (DD Form 139) prepared by local Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) officials at Fort Meade, Maryland, confirmed that the applicant was indebted to the Army in the amount of $3362.82. The reason for this debt was listed as his being over paid for the periods November 1997 through January 1998 and December 2000 through January 2001. In March 2001, the applicant submitted an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness (DA Form 3508-R) through channels claiming injustice and hardship.
7. On 14 March 2001, the applicant’s unit Adjutant completed a memorandum in support of the applicant’s request for cancellation or remission of indebtedness to the Army. This statement attested to the chain of command’s support of the applicant’s request and indicated that the applicant had made several attempts to correct the incorrect service dates that resulted in his indebtedness. It further stated that the applicant had been repeatedly told by Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) officials that his service dates were correct and that he was miscalculating the dates and it was not until the unit personnel staff noncommissioned officer (PSNCO) became involved that ARPERSCOM finally realized their mistake and the error in the applicant’s service dates. The Adjutant finally indicated that due to the applicant being placed in a financial hardship, through no fault of his own, the chain of command was requesting that the request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness be approved in the best interest of the applicant, his family, and the Army.
8. On 19 March 2001, the DFAS Disbursing Officer, Fort Meade, Maryland, forwarded the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R to PERSCOM and confirmed the applicant was indebted to the government in the amount of $3362.82 and requested remission or cancellation of the debt based on hardship and injustice. The Disbursing Officer, after reviewing the circumstances of the case, recommended approval of the applicant’s request.
9. On 18 April 2001, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), responded to the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, which had been received in his office on 3 April 2001. In his reply, this PERSCOM official indicated that the governing regulation did not allow the remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the Army after an expiration of term of service date had passed unless a soldier has reenlisted. He further advised him to apply to this Board if he felt an injustice had occurred; however, this did not imply that an error or injustice had occurred in his case.
10. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was requested of and received from the PERSCOM Chief, Special Actions, dated
17 October 2001. It indicated that had the applicant still been on active duty when his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness was received at PERSCOM, favorable consideration would have been granted. This favorable consideration would have been based on the recommendation of the supporting DFAS office and the lack of evidence to contradict the applicant’s claim that he was not at fault for the overpayment that resulted in his indebtedness to the Army. In addition, the confirmation of the applicant’s chain of command that repeated attempts had been made to correct the mistake further supported the applicant’s claim of injustice.
11. Army Regulation 600-4 provides the policy and procedure for submitting applications for the remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the Army based on hardship, injustice, or both. It further states, in pertinent part, that in determining if injustice or hardship exists the soldier’s income, expenses, and a member’s contribution to the indebtedness by not having the situation corrected will be considered.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his indebtedness to the Army should be remitted or cancelled based on hardship and injustice considerations and it finds this claim has merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant made repeated attempts to correct the overpayment that resulted in his indebtedness to the Army, as evidenced in the supporting comments from his chain of command and the lack of contradictory evidence provided by the local DFAS officials.
3. In addition, the Board concurs with the finding of the PERSCOM Chief, Special Actions, that the applicant’s indebtedness to the Army is unjust, given his repeated attempts to resolve the overpayment that resulted in his indebtedness to the Army, as evidenced by the approval recommendations of the applicant’s chain of command and local DFAS officials.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected showing that the indebtedness to the Army of the individual concerned was unjust and by remitting or canceling his $3362.82 indebtedness to the Army.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE __ __BJE__ __KYF __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Fred N. Eichorn __
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058615 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/11/08 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 283 | 128.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074808C070403
On the same date, he forwarded a memorandum to DFAS, Fort Knox and further recommended that the applicant's request for remission/ cancellation of indebtedness be approved. The applicant's commander also recommended that, if DFAS determined the applicant was responsible for part or all of the debt, repayment be made over a 24-month period. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant's debt to the US Government in the amount...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078402C070215
Army Regulation 600-4 provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the United States Army. Further, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. In the opinion of the Board, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101211C070208
The applicant states that he was provided the incorrect form in November 2000 when he applied for remission of his debt and consequently, the money was taken from his pay. That command indicated that PERSCOM had returned the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness in July 2001 because it was incomplete and stated that the application provided to them with the request for an advisory opinion was also incomplete. His March 2003 LES indicates that his indebtedness...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086768C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: He states he had numerous discussions with DFAS personnel, promotions personnel, and the Criminal Investigation (Division) Command (CID) about his promotion to SSG. In order to remain an applicant for the ASAC program, the applicant formally declined the promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076096C070215
In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with supporting documents; a memorandum from Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM); a notice of indebtedness from the installation finance office with supporting documents; an e-mail notification; and a copy of his May 2002 leave and earnings statement (LES). The letter also informed the applicant that $2,348.60 of the debt...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059889C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be reimbursed $6,702.67 collected from his earnings to pay back a debt to the government for overpayment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The applicant was also informed by the letter that $6,702.67 of the debt collected prior to the commander’s suspension of the debt collection, could not be considered for remission or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009793
Had DFAS processed his request, he would not have the debt. The form shows he requested to stop BAQ and that he had been assigned to government quarters. To determine injustice the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know and could not have known of the error and/or the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076560C070215
By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. In the opinion of the Board, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that his application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness of $18,1460.65 due to an overpayment of OHA and BAQ was approved in full, as if the collection of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856
The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...