| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Paul A. Petty | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be reimbursed $6,702.67 collected from his earnings to pay back a debt to the government for overpayment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that when he arrived at Fort Stewart, Georgia, and inprocessed, he informed them that he was in government housing. When he got to his unit, he also informed them that he was in government housing. But his BAH never stopped. When it did not stop, he submitted pay inquiries several times to find out what was wrong. He never received a reply. His first sergeant and platoon sergeant were aware of the problem. He went with his section sergeant to the first sergeant and told him again about the overpayments. His first sergeant said he would check and find out about the BAH since he and his wife were a dual military family. The first sergeant came back and said there was no problem with his BAH pay and so informed his section and platoon sergeants. A year went by and nothing was said until the first sergeant got ready to retire. Though he tried to stop the BAH pay, in about July 1999, he was accused of fraud. He went through a year of investigation and was found not at fault. The monthly collection of the debt caused him great financial hardship. He did what he was supposed to but did not receive help to stop the overpayments.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
That he, a specialist who was later promoted to sergeant, was transferred from assignment in Korea to assignment in Company D, 703d Main Support Battalion, at Fort Stewart, Georgia, on 19 February 1998. He was married to a senior enlisted military member who was assigned government housing at Fort Stewart. They had a 3 year old dependent daughter.
On 16 August 1999, he was charged by military finance with a debt of $13,116.52 for overpayment of BAH and Variable Housing Allowance (VHA) during the period of January 1997 through August 1999, in amounts of $408 to $475 per month. In October 1999, an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation was conducted which cleared the applicant of fault and pending Uniform Code of Military Justice nonjudicial action. On 17 November 1999, the Chief of Military Pay issued a letter to the applicant’s unit commander informing him that the applicant had a debt of $12,738.99. The letter provided a suspense until
16 January 2000, to arrange a repayment plan. Starting about February 2000, $445.77 was collected monthly from his earnings. In October 2000, he applied for debt relief but the request was lost. On 21 December 2000, he again submitted a DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) to apply for debt relief based on financial hardship. His commander recommended approval. His battalion commander and the Division
Support Command (DISCOM) commander also recommended approval. Debt collection was suspended on or about 19 April 2001.
On 13 June 2001, the Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), approved remission or cancellation of the remaining indebtedness of $5,949.30. The applicant was also informed by the letter that $6,702.67 of the debt collected prior to the commander’s suspension of the debt collection, could not be considered for remission or cancellation under the provisions of paragraph
1-11b, Army Regulation 600-4. The letter stated that if the applicant felt that an injustice had occurred surrounding the collected portion of the debt, that he could apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for further review.
Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlisted Members), paragraph 1.11b, states that the Commanding General, PERSCOM, will not consider the remission or cancellation of a debt repaid or collected before the immediate commander signed the DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness). If a debt is paid in part, however, the remaining portion will be considered.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. That the applicant received overpayment of allowances for BAH and VHA in the amount of approximately $12,651.97, of which $6,702.67 was collected back and $5,949.30 was remitted and cancelled due to financial hardship. He has retained the benefit of the $5,949.30 that he received as overpayment and is not required to repay. The amount that was collected, $6,702.67, was a just debt to pay back overpayment that he had received. The applicant stated that he knew that he was being overpaid. Failure of the system to properly stop overpayment in a timely manner, in this case, does not relieve the applicant of responsibility for paying back what he knew he was overpaid. No justification has been established to reimburse the applicant the overpayment collected back against this just debt.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jl___ ___jm___ ___mm_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001059889 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011011 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.1 – Remission/Cancellation of Debt |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016954
On 17 October 2005, the applicant's unit commander prepared a memorandum for the commander of the local finance office requesting that collection of the applicant's debt be stopped pending the final disposition of the applicant's application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness. He further confirmed that the applicant had informed and coordinated with his chain of command on all these matters relating to the changes in his dependents status, and that the applicant was told by local...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856
The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072546C070403
She reiterated that she knew she was not entitled to BAH at the “with dependents” rate, that she did try to stop it, that she went to her chain of command for assistance to stop it, and that she informed her chain of command that once her BAH got straightened out she would request remission or cancellation of the debt. The Board considered the applicant’s contentions that she knew she was not entitled to BAH at the “with dependents” rate, that she tried to stop it, that she went to her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017641
The applicant states she was informed by the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office, Fort Campbell, KY, that the BAH was not corrected and she had a BAH overpayment debt. However, there is no evidence in her available records and she has not provided evidence which shows the Fort Campbell Defense Military Pay Office was in error when it approved BAH for her based on her DA Form 5960. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's available record that shows the Fort Campbell Defense...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101211C070208
The applicant states that he was provided the incorrect form in November 2000 when he applied for remission of his debt and consequently, the money was taken from his pay. That command indicated that PERSCOM had returned the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness in July 2001 because it was incomplete and stated that the application provided to them with the request for an advisory opinion was also incomplete. His March 2003 LES indicates that his indebtedness...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212
The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016673
The applicant requests remission or cancellation of his debt to the Government in the amount of $19,452.97. A review of the applicants official records shows that prior to being appointed as an aviator warrant officer, the applicant served as a personnel sergeant responsible for the daily administration and operation of a personnel administration center servicing over 523 Soldiers and civilians in matters related to finance and personnel actions as well as many other types of actions. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006368C070208
A 13 February 2004 Pay Adjustment Authorization shows that the applicant was overpaid for BAH (basic allowance for housing) in the amount of $23,102.91 from 8 January 1999 to 4 November 2003; and for FSH (Family Separation Housing) in the amount of $223.33 from 10 July 1999 to 16 September 1999. The Commandant of the Noncommissioned Officer Academy at Fort Eustis had previously requested that the applicant’s indebtedness be cancelled, stating that the debt would cause serious hardship for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076096C070215
In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with supporting documents; a memorandum from Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM); a notice of indebtedness from the installation finance office with supporting documents; an e-mail notification; and a copy of his May 2002 leave and earnings statement (LES). The letter also informed the applicant that $2,348.60 of the debt...