| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be paid a Regular Reenlistment Bonus (RRB).
3. The applicant states that he was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and has never received a reenlistment bonus from either the Army or the Navy. He further states that in discussion with a retention noncommissioned officer (NCO) he was informed that he met the criteria for a RRB.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted in the Navy on 29 November 1971 and served until he was honorably released from active duty on 26 May 1976, when he was transferred to the Naval Reserve Control Group. On 30 September 1986, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years, training as a cardiac specialist and assignment to Health Services Command. On 2 August 1989, while serving in the pay grade of E-5, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years. This was the first period of service in which he qualified for a RRB. His reenlistment contract indicated that he had no bonus entitlement. He again reenlisted on 11 December 1991 for a period of 4 years and again had no bonus entitlement. On 5 March 1993, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years, with no bonus entitlements. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 August 1995 and on 4 December 1996, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years, with no bonus entitlement. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 April 2000 and on 31 May 2002, he was honorably released from active duty and was placed on the Retired List effective 1 June 2002. He had served 20 years, 2 months and 22 days of total active service.
5. A review of all of the applicant’s Army enlistment and reenlistment documents fails to show any bonus entitlements. Additionally, he would not have been eligible for an RRB during his active service in the Navy.
6. Army Regulation 601-280 establishes policy and procedures for the Total Army Retention Program. It states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 June 1974, the use of the RRB was terminated. However, each soldier on active duty on 1 June 1974 will continue to be eligible to receive at least $2,000.00 for reenlisting (RRB, Selective Reenlistment Bonus, or combination of both) during an entire 20-year career.
7. The Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual prescribes the basic conditions for entitlements to the RRB. It states, in pertinent part, that the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974, the initial date necessary to qualify for payment of the RRB.
2. The applicant, after completing his enlistment of 30 September 1986, reenlisted on 2 August 1989 for a period of 3 years, while serving in the pay grade of E-5. This was the first period of service in which he qualified for a RRB.
3. He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and there is no evidence on any of his contracts to show that he was ever entitled to receive any type of bonus.
4. In the absence of evidence to show that he did in fact receive a bonus and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB beginning with his 3-year reenlistment on 2 August 1989 and any subsequent reenlistments, until such time as his RRB entitlements are exhausted.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was entitled to receive a RRB beginning with his 2 August 1989 reenlistment of 3 years.
BOARD VOTE:
__gw____ ___pm __ __kan___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Kathleen A. Newman___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002074734 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/01/23 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 288 | 128.0500/RRB |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510092C070209
It opined, in effect, that the applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and therefore was entitled to receive a RRB of up to $2,000.00 beginning with his first reenlistment and subsequent reenlistments until such time as the maximum amount had been paid. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB and in light of the determinations from the PERSCOM and the DFAS that the applicant was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 2-year reenlistment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511824C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 10 July 1992 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510653C070209
The applicant states, in effect, that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was entitled to receive an RRB...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509051C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 3 November 1982 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606982C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 28 April 1976 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507720C070209
The applicant states that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 3-year reenlistment on 14 October 1994 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012105
The applicants military records show that he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 5 May 1972. He concluded by essentially stating that it would appear to him that sufficient documentation to provide he did not receive an RRB was provided by him because none of his DD Forms 214 indicate payment of an RRB. The applicant was both a Recruiter and a Finance Specialist during his career in the Army and he did not provide LESs which conclusively show that he was not paid an RRB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078533C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089558C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He remained in the RA through continuous reenlistments until he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) 17 May 1970. It states, in pertinent part, that the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006756C070208
Marla J. Troup | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests a determination if he is eligible for a regular reenlistment bonus (RRB). The applicant provides Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) policy message 96-18; his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 March 1976; his 7 October 1986 enlistment contract; his Enlisted Record Brief; and his DA Form...