2. The applicant requests that he be paid a regular reenlistment bonus (RRB).
3. The applicant states that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB.
4. The applicants military records show that he initially enlisted on 26 November 1973 and served until 18 November 1975 when he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement). On 6 March 1990 he again enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 5 years. The applicant, after completing his enlistment of 6 March 1990, reenlisted on 14 October 1994 for a period of 3 years while serving in the pay grade of E-5. This was his first period of service in which he qualified for an RRB.
5. A review of all of the applicants reenlistment documents fails to show bonus entitlements.
6. Army Regulation 601-280 establishes policy and procedures for the Total Army Retention Program. It states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 June 1974, the use of the RRB was terminated. However, each soldier on active duty on 1 June 1974 will continue to be eligible to receive at least $2,000.00 for reenlisting (RRB, SRB, or combination) during an entire 20-year career.
7. The Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual prescribes the basic conditions for entitlement to the RRB. It states, in pertinent part, that the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974, the initial date necessary to qualify for payment of the RRB.
2. The applicant, after completing his enlistment of 6 March 1990, reenlisted on 14 October 1994 for a period of 3 years while serving in the pay grade of E-5. This was his first period of service in which he qualified for an RRB.
3. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements.
4. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 3-year reenlistment on 14 October 1994 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted.
5. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was entitled to receive an RRB beginning with his 14 October 1994 reenlistment of 3 years.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510653C070209
The applicant states, in effect, that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was entitled to receive an RRB...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509051C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 3 November 1982 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511824C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 10 July 1992 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606982C070209
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 28 April 1976 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510092C070209
It opined, in effect, that the applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and therefore was entitled to receive a RRB of up to $2,000.00 beginning with his first reenlistment and subsequent reenlistments until such time as the maximum amount had been paid. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB and in light of the determinations from the PERSCOM and the DFAS that the applicant was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 2-year reenlistment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074734C070403
The applicant states that he was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and has never received a reenlistment bonus from either the Army or the Navy. In the absence of evidence to show that he did in fact receive a bonus and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB beginning with his 3-year reenlistment on 2 August 1989 and any subsequent reenlistments, until such time as his RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012105
The applicants military records show that he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 5 May 1972. He concluded by essentially stating that it would appear to him that sufficient documentation to provide he did not receive an RRB was provided by him because none of his DD Forms 214 indicate payment of an RRB. The applicant was both a Recruiter and a Finance Specialist during his career in the Army and he did not provide LESs which conclusively show that he was not paid an RRB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078533C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076563C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The DoDFMR states, in pertinent part, that an RRB may be paid to an enlisted member who was on AD on 1 June 1974, and who reenlisted within 3 months from the date of discharge or separation after 1 June 1974. He also provided a copy of his DD Forms 4 (Reenlistment Contracts) for 17 January 1973, 13 August 1977, and 19 February 1987; and reenlistment orders (Special Orders...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089558C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He remained in the RA through continuous reenlistments until he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) 17 May 1970. It states, in pertinent part, that the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).