Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510092C070209
Original file (9510092C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that he be paid a regular reenlistment bonus (RRB).

3.  He states that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and that according to the applicable regulations, he was eligible to receive at least the RRB of $2,000.00.

4.  The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted in the Air Force on 12 July 1973 and served until he was honorably released from active duty on 1 June 1977 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.

5.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 July 1986 for a period of 3 years.  On 4 August 1989 he reenlisted for a period of 2 years while serving in the pay grade of E-5.  He again reenlisted on 31 May 1991 for a period of 3 years and on 26 October 1993 for a period of 3 years while serving in the pay grade of E-6.  All of the applicant’s reenlistment contracts indicate that the applicant had no bonus entitlements. 

6.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  It opined, in effect, that the applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and therefore was entitled to receive a RRB of up to $2,000.00 beginning with his first reenlistment and subsequent reenlistments until such time as the maximum amount had been paid.

7.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) determined that the applicant was eligible to receive an RRB; however, because it could not determine whether or not he had been previously paid any type of bonus, it could not effect payment to the applicant without approval of the Board. 

8.  The Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual prescribes the basic conditions for entitlements to the RRB.  It states, in pertinent part, that 


the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was on active duty on 1 June 1974, the initial date necessary to qualify for payment of the RRB.

2.  The applicant, after completing his enlistment of 8 July 1986, reenlisted on 4 August 1989 for a period of 2 years.  This was the first period of service in which he qualified for an RRB.

3.  There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant received an RRB nor was the DFAS able to ascertain whether or not the applicant received an RRB.

4.  In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB and in light of the determinations from the PERSCOM and the DFAS that the applicant was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 2-year reenlistment on 4 August 1989 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted.

5.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was entitled to receive an RRB beginning with his 4 August 1989 reenlistment of 2 years.                 

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511824C070209

    Original file (9511824C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 10 July 1992 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510653C070209

    Original file (9510653C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was entitled to receive an RRB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074734C070403

    Original file (2002074734C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was on active duty on 1 June 1974 and has never received a reenlistment bonus from either the Army or the Navy. In the absence of evidence to show that he did in fact receive a bonus and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB beginning with his 3-year reenlistment on 2 August 1989 and any subsequent reenlistments, until such time as his RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509051C070209

    Original file (9509051C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 3 November 1982 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606982C070209

    Original file (9606982C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was ever authorized or ever received any bonus entitlements. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 4-year reenlistment on 28 April 1976 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507720C070209

    Original file (9507720C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he has never received an RRB or a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) and according to his career counselor he should have received at least an RRB. In the absence of evidence to show he received an RRB, and in light of the fact that he was eligible to receive the RRB, the applicant should be paid the RRB for his 3-year reenlistment on 14 October 1994 and any subsequent reenlistments until such time as RRB entitlements are exhausted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012105

    Original file (20060012105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show that he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 5 May 1972. He concluded by essentially stating that it would appear to him that sufficient documentation to provide he did not receive an RRB was provided by him because none of his DD Forms 214 indicate payment of an RRB. The applicant was both a Recruiter and a Finance Specialist during his career in the Army and he did not provide LESs which conclusively show that he was not paid an RRB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078533C070215

    Original file (2002078533C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006756C070208

    Original file (20040006756C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Marla J. Troup | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests a determination if he is eligible for a regular reenlistment bonus (RRB). The applicant provides Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) policy message 96-18; his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 March 1976; his 7 October 1986 enlistment contract; his Enlisted Record Brief; and his DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089558C070403

    Original file (2003089558C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He remained in the RA through continuous reenlistments until he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) 17 May 1970. It states, in pertinent part, that the RRB applies to members who were on active duty on 1 June 1974 and who thereafter reenlist within 3 months of being discharged (continuous service is not required).