| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | ||
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be provided back pay and allowances due as a result of a correction made to his chief warrant officer two (CW2) date of rank.
3. The applicant provides a date of rank determination memorandum published by the Promotions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM),
Alexandria, Virginia, in support of his application.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he is currently serving on active duty at Fort Rucker, Alabama, in the rank of CW2/W-2.
5. On 11 March 2002, the Chief, Military Personnel Services Team 2, Military Personnel Division (MPD), Fort Rucker, Alabama, submitted a memorandum to the Commander, PERSCOM, requesting a date of rank determination on the applicant.
6. On 26 April 2002, the PERSCOM promotions branch published a memorandum, Subject: Date of Rank Determination, pertaining to the applicant. This memorandum indicated that the Fort Rucker request for a date of rank determination on the applicant had been reviewed, and based on the new information provided, it was determined that the applicant’s warrant officer one (WO1) date of rank was 1 April 1997. Based on this WO1 date of rank, the applicant gained eligibility for promotion to CW2 on 8 March 2002, and PERSCOM took action to correct his records to reflect this promotion date. The memorandum further stipulated that the applicant would have to apply to this Board to receive any back pay and allowances due as a result of the change in his CW2 date of rank.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is due back pay and allowances based on the change in his CW2 promotion date, and it finds this claim has merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant gained eligibility and should have been promoted to the rank of CW2 effective 8 March 2002. However, due to an error in his WO1 date of rank he was not promoted to CW2 on time. Army personnel officials have since taken administrative action to correct the error and have corrected the applicant’s record accordingly. Thus, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to provide the applicant any back pay and allowances due as a result of the change in CW2 promotion date.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant was promoted to the rank and pay grade of CW2/W-2, effective 8 March 2002; and by providing him any back pay and allowances due as a result.
BOARD VOTE:
_RVO___ ___JPI__ __PM____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr._
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002072962 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 21 | 102.0700 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091042C070212
The applicant requests that the effective date of his promotion to Chief Warrant Office Two (CW2), pay grade, W-2, be adjusted from 15 April 2003 to 1 December 2002 and that he be given all back pay and allowances which he was denied as a result of the delays in his being promoted. The Date of Rank Section also determined that the applicant had attained eligibility for promotion to the grade of CW2 on 1 December 2002 and advised the officer to submit an application for the correction of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009567
d. The applicant concludes by stating, in effect, that within 6 months of May 2004 he completed the Qualification Course for the UH-1 and then completed the C-26 Qualification Course less than a year later. The evidence of record further shows that upon review of the applicant's NGB Form 62-E, the commander of the applicant's proposed unit recommended approval of the applicant's appointment to fill a UH-60 Pilot position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066988C070402
The applicant requests correction of her date of rank (DOR) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) and that she be awarded all back pay and allowances. Orders were published on 21 October 2001 which promoted the applicant to CW2 with an effective date of 23 January 2000 and with a DOR of 23 January 2000. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is no error or injustice in this case regarding the applicant's DOR to CW2; however, it would be appropriate to award the applicant all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084908C070212
The applicant requests reconsideration of previous application to correct his military records by backdating his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of chief warrant officer three (CW3). After hearing the testimony and reviewing the evidence presented, the board of officers found the applicant innocent of the allegation that he had abused the illegal drug – marijuana, that his unknowing ingestion was from an over-the-counter product called Hemp Liquid Gold. Army Regulation 600-85,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072511C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the orders which terminated his service and pay as an aviator be revoked, that he be reinstated to active duty as an aviator in military occupational specialty (MOS) 153D, that he be allowed to attend the aviation refresher course and maintenance test pilot (MTP) course at Fort Rucker, Alabama, that he be awarded the Senior Aviator Badge, and that he be paid Aviation Career Incentive Pay (ACIP) for the period of 22 February 1998 to 24 November 1999. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080679C070215
In February 2002, the applicant submitted a request asking that he be reinstated on the promotion list and that he be scheduled to attend the ANCOC. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the effective date and date of rank of his promotion to SFC/E-7 should be restored to 8 January 2000, because the revocation of this promotion was based on an unverified and flawed body fat measurement that resulted in his unjustly being denied enrollment in the ANCOC, and it finds this claim has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065668C070421
In December 2001 the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) informed the applicant’s command at Fort Bliss that the applicant would be separated from active duty [as a two time non select for promotion] for the purpose of enlisting in the Regular Army. Army Regulation 600-8-24, which establishes the policies and procedures for the separation of commissioned and warrant officers, states that chief warrant officers on the active duty list twice non-selected for promotion to the rank of CW3,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008630
On 25 August 2005, the applicant was appointed a WO1 in the UTARNG as an Aviation Safety Officer. The evidence of record confirms that prior to the applicants appointment in the UTARNG as an Aviation Safety Officer, he completed more than 2 years of active duty service in the USAF in the rank of CPT from the date of his promotion in that rank on 12 September 1984 through his REFRAD on 31 August 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard Records and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008684
The applicant requests that he be credited with his previous time in grade as a National Guard chief warrant officer two (CW2). The applicant provides copies of his 1990 promotion memorandum to CW2, his 1994 commissioning certificate and orders, 2006 discharge orders as a captain, 2006 appointment orders as a CW2 and an exchange of email messages about his status. Army Regulation 135-155 (National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016386
The applicant requests that her initial appointment date to warrant officer one (WO1) be changed from 21 August 2008 to 1 May 2007 and that she be promoted to the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2) on 1 May 2009. The applicant states, in effect, that she initially took her oath of office as a WO1 on 1 May 2007; however, her Temporary Federal Recognition expired before permanent Federal Recognition was obtained and she had to be re-appointed by a Federal Recognition Board on 21 August...