Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084908C070212
Original file (2003084908C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 4 September 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084908


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Frank C. Jones Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests reconsideration of previous application to correct his military records by backdating his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of chief warrant officer three (CW3).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his attorney did not properly or accurately represent his case to the Board and therefore, he requests that the facts as outlined in his application be reconsidered by the Board and that his DOR be back-dated to May 1998. He continues by stating that he was promoted to the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2) on 6 July 1991 and that he entered the Maryland Army National Guard (MDARNG) from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in January 1997. He goes on to state that he had sufficient time in grade for promotion to the rank of CW3 in the MDARNG; however, the MDARNG requires completion of the warrant officer advanced course (WOAC) prior to promotion to the rank of CW3, so he procured a seat in the WOAC beginning 19 January 1998. He further states that on 8 January 1998, he was advised by his commander that he tested positive for THC (tetrahdrocannabinol) during a urinalysis. As a result, he was flagged, his school seat was canceled and all favorable personnel actions were suspended. He quickly discovered that an over-the-counter health food supplement known as Hemp Liquid Gold (a liquid form of essential fatty acids used to support immune system functions) contained enough THC to cause a positive urinalysis. On 20 January 1999, he requested in writing that he be allowed to appear before a retention board to plead his case. Despite all efforts by his chain of command, it was not until he requested the assistance of his congressional representative that he was granted a hearing on 13 January 2000. After presenting evidence and expert testimony, he was cleared of any wrongdoing and he had to complete the WOAC by correspondence before he could get promoted, because residence attendance was no longer available. As soon as he finished the course he was promoted to the rank of CW3 in October 2000. However, had the chain of command not dragged the case out, he would have been able to be promoted in May 1998. In support of his application he submits a letter of support from his commander, his promotion orders and the board results.

4. The Memorandum of Consideration (MOC) of the Board’s 18 October 2001 review of the case (AR2001056132) is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth.

5. The applicant’s submission is new evidence and/or argument that requires Board consideration.

6. The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of CW2 on 5 July 1994 and was transferred to the USAR. He was selected for promotion to the rank of CW3 by the 1996 USAR promotion selection board for promotion on 6 July 1997. However, on 5 March 1997, he accepted an appointment in the MDARNG.
7. On 4 December 1997, orders were published by the MDARNG which directed the applicant to report to the WOAC at Fort Rucker, Alabama, for the period of 19 January to 24 March 1998.

8. On 8 January 1998, the applicant was advised that he tested positive for THC in a urinalysis conducted on 13 December 1997. The applicant was advised of his rights and a suspension of favorable personnel actions (flag) was initiated against him. His commander also initiated a request to withdraw the applicant's Federal Recognition.

9. On 20 January 1998, the applicant submitted a request to appear before a board of officers to determine if he should be retained in service.

10. The applicant appeared before a board of officers on 22 January 2000, 2 years after his request, and was represented by civilian counsel. After hearing the testimony and reviewing the evidence presented, the board of officers found the applicant innocent of the allegation that he had abused the illegal drug – marijuana, that his unknowing ingestion was from an over-the-counter product called Hemp Liquid Gold. The board refused to recommend his withdrawal of Federal Recognition and apologized for the delay in conducting the proceedings. The Board recommended that Federal Recognition be retained and that he be restored to regular duty status.

11. On 25 October 2000, the applicant was promoted to the rank of CW3 with a DOR and effective date of 19 October 2000.

12. On 1 March 2002, the applicant's commander at the time, authored a statement in which he asserts, in effect, that the applicant was denied due process by the chain of command and that he would have been promoted to the rank of CW3 in the spring of 1998, had those delays not have occurred. He supports the applicant's request to have his DOR back-dated.

13. In March 1999, the United States Air Force (USAF) amended Air Force Instruction 44-121 (Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program) to prohibit military members from ingesting hemp oil or products made with hemp seed oil.

14. On 14 April 1999, the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) dispatched ALCOAST Message Number 026/99, which prohibited USCG members from ingesting hemp oil or products made with hemp seed oil.

15. Army Regulation 600-85, Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), effective 15 October 2001, provides, in paragraph 1-35d, that products made from hemp seed oil may contain varying levels of THC, an active ingredient of marijuana, which is detectable under the Army Drug Testing Program. In order to ensure military readiness, the ingestion of hemp seed oil or products made with hemp seed oil is a violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. The Board finds that the applicant was properly exonerated of any wrongdoing by a duly constituted board of officers. However, the 2-year delay in convening the board of officers in order to allow him due process has denied him a benefit that he otherwise would have been able to obtain had the error/injustice not occurred.

2. While the Board understands that the issue at hand was in fact a "new frontier" that had not been previously explored and mapped out, the fact remains that the applicant unknowingly ingested a product that contained THC and has since been banned by the Army and other services. His due process rights were delayed and as a result, he was denied the opportunity to attend the WOAC as scheduled and his promotion to the rank of CW3 was unjustly delayed.

3. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant is entitled to have his effective date and DOR for promotion to the rank of CW3 back-dated to 19 May 1998, with entitlement to all back pay and allowances from that date.

4. Although the Board has no authority to correct State Army National Guard (ARNG) records governed under Title 32 of the United States Code, the Board is of the opinion that in so far as the Department of the Army is concerned, it would be in the best interest of justice to correct the ARNG records of the individual concerned.

5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would correct an error or rectify an injustice.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he individual concerned was promoted to the rank of CW3, effective 19 May 1998, with a DOR of 19 May 1998 and entitlement to all back pay and allowances from that date.
BOARD VOTE:

___fcj ___ ___bje __ ___rvo __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr._
                  CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084908
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/09/04
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 315 131.0500/dor
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.





Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07685-05

    Original file (07685-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. (13) to investigate the possibility of a positive urine drug test as a result of daily ingestion of various amounts of these “new’ t preparations, with total daily doses of THC ranging from 0.09 to 0.6 mg (equivalent to 45-300 g of hulled hemp seeds containing 2 /Lg/g THC or 19—120 mL of hemp-seed oil at 5 mg/L THC) in the form of blends of hemp- seed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06158-01

    Original file (06158-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    g. A Navy pharmacologist submitted a report to the ADB in which she stated that both marijuana and hemp will produce the metabolite THC. The majority notes that the DAA.R reporting the accession urinalysis was apparently never acted upon by anyone and it was not considered in the discharge processing. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review and action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106846C070208

    Original file (04106846C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She notes that the UCMJ action states that she violated Article 112a, wrongful use of marijuana, a schedule I controlled substance, when her letter of reprimand and polygraph test results clearly show that she did not use a controlled substance, but rather, exercised poor judgment by using a dietary supplement, hemp seed. The applicant also states, in effect, that if she truly violated Article 112a, under the “zero tolerance” rule her UCMJ action would not have been filed in her restricted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010886C070206

    Original file (20050010886C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Record of Nonjudicial Punishment (DA Form 2627), dated 28 February 2003, be set aside, with all rights, privileges and property restored; that it be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); that the Officer Evaluation Report (OER), dated 29 November 2002, be removed from his OMPF; that his administrative separation be reversed and his records corrected to reflect that he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100659C070208

    Original file (2004100659C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following corrections: removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), administrative separation board (ASB) proceedings and promotion flagging orders from his official military personnel file (OMPF); a change to the narrative reason for his discharge; promotion to lieutenant colonel with a date of rank of 15 August 2000 and back pay for 20 years; and issue of a Twenty-Year Letter, dated on or about 5 March 1999. The applicant states, in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016278

    Original file (AR20060016278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 1 December 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 27 December...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01735

    Original file (BC-2003-01735.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant request the Article 15 and resultant punishment, be set aside and promotion to the grade of master sergeant, effective 1 October 2000. An Administrative Discharge Board (ADB) found that he did commit drug abuse on an experimental basis and since it was not likely to reoccur, recommended that he be retained in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019552

    Original file (20110019552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for chief warrant officer three (CW3) from 12 April 2010 to 17 September 2003. Federal Recognition orders, dated 15 April 2010, show he was promoted to CW3 effective 12 April 2010. c. National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 7-7a(1), states "to be eligible for promotion, an ARNG warrant officer should be in an active status and DMOS (Duty Military...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000685

    Original file (ND1000685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019246

    Original file (20080019246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests adjustment of his promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer three (CW3) from 5 December 2007 to 16 March 2007. He met the time in grade requirements of Table 7-1 of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (Warrant Officer - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) and NGB Personnel Policy and Readiness Policy Letter 07-25, dated 29 August 2007, which state that the minimum time in grade requirements for promotion to CW3 is five...