Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008630
Original file (20080008630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008630 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his initial appointment rank in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and Federal recognition be changed from warrant officer one (WO1) to chief warrant officer two (CW2).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers –Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) allows former officers in the grade of captain (CPT) to be assessed into the ARNG at the rank of CW2.  He indicates that this rule was overlooked during the time of his appointment.

3.  The applicant provides Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) memoranda dated 14 July 2004, 24 March 2008, and 29 April 2008; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Departments of the Army and Air Force Special Orders Number 79 AR dated 26 March 2008, Number 87 AR dated 3 April 2008, and Number 258 AR dated 2 September 2005; UTARNG Joint Forces Headquarters Orders 085-001 dated 25 March 2008; Headquarters, United States Army Aviation Warfighting Center and Fort Rucker, memorandum dated 25 March 2008; and NGB memoranda dated 19 November 2004 and 25 May 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military record shows that he initially entered active duty in the United States Air Force (USAF) on 13 September 1980, as a member of the USAF Reserve (USAFR).  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialties (MOS) 1115H (Pilot Fighter), 1145H (Pilot Forward Air Controller), and 1441F (Air Operations Officer).

2.  On 31 August 1987, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of CPT.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time confirms he completed 6 years, 11 months, and 19 days of active military service and item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) confirms he was promoted to CPT on 13 September 1984.

3.  On 25 August 2005, the applicant was appointed a WO1 in the UTARNG as an Aviation Safety Officer.  He was granted Federal Recognition as a WO1 effective 25 August 2005.

4.  On 25 March 2008, the UTARNG published Orders 085-001 which announced the applicant's promotion to CW2 with an effective date and date of rank of 1 October 2007.

5.  The applicant provides Headquarters, United States Army Aviation Warfighting Center and Fort Rucker, memorandum dated 25 March 2008.  The Director of Aviation Personnel Proponency indicates that the applicant’s appointment in the grade of CW2 is approved in accordance with the applicable National Guard Regulation.

6.  The applicant also provides UTARNG letters from the Director of Personnel, the Assistant Adjutant General, and the G-1.  Each of these individuals indicate that the applicant met the rank, time in grade, and experience requirements necessary for accession into the ARNG in the rank of CW2.

7.  During the processing of the case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB.  The Chief advised that based on the applicant’s military record, prior service, and National Guard Regulation 600-101 appointment guidance, the applicant’s initial appointment in the UTARNG should have been in the rank of CW2.  Accordingly, this official recommended approval of the applicant’s request and that he be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result.

8.  The applicant was forwarded a copy of the advisory opinion on 19 August 2008 for his rebuttal or comments.  To date he has not responded.

9.  National Guard Regulation 600-101 prescribes the NGB policies and procedures governing the appointment, assignment, and management of warrant officers of the ARNG.  Chapter 2, paragraph 2-10b(1), states that an initial appointment will be as a WO1, except commissioned and former commissioned officers who have served a minimum of 2 years in an active status in the grade of CPT or above and have a minimum of 4 years of experience in the appointment specialty may be appointed to CW2 if certified by the Department of the Army (DA) MOS Proponent (attendance of the Warrant Officer Basic Course (WOBC) is not required).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By regulation, commissioned and former commissioned officers who have served a minimum of 2 years in an active status in the grade of CPT or above and have a minimum of 4 years of experience in the appointment specialty may be appointed to CW2 if certified by the DA MOS Proponent and attendance of WOBC is not required.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that prior to the applicant’s appointment in the UTARNG as an Aviation Safety Officer, he completed more than 2 years of active duty service in the USAF in the rank of CPT from the date of his promotion in that rank on 12 September 1984 through his REFRAD on 31 August 1987.  It also shows that he served as a Pilot Fighter, Pilot Forward Air Controller, and Air Operations Officer for more than 6 years during his USAF active duty service from 13 September 1980 to 31 August 1987.  Accordingly, the regulatory criteria has been satisfied in this case and the applicant’s record should be corrected at this time to show that he was initially appointed in the UTARNG and granted Federal recognition in the rank of CW2 on 25 August 2005.  In addition, he should be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard Records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant’s military record to 

show he was initially appointed in the UTARNG and granted Federal recognition in the rank of chief warrant officer two on 25 August 2005 and by providing him all back pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.



      _________x________________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008630



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008630



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010230

    Original file (20090010230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 December 2007 he was appointed as a warrant officer one (WO1) in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) and believes he should have been appointed in a higher rank due to his prior training and service. A second advisory opinion notes that in order to qualify for appointment as a WO2, a candidate must meet all training requirements. Since all Army aviators must be accessed as helicopter pilots (MOS 154A) first and the applicant had no training in helicopters, he could only be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009567

    Original file (20060009567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. The applicant concludes by stating, in effect, that within 6 months of May 2004 he completed the Qualification Course for the UH-1 and then completed the C-26 Qualification Course less than a year later. The evidence of record further shows that upon review of the applicant's NGB Form 62-E, the commander of the applicant's proposed unit recommended approval of the applicant's appointment to fill a UH-60 Pilot position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011388

    Original file (20110011388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011388 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the effective date of promotion and date of rank to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Army National Guard (ARNG) be adjusted from 20 January 2011 to 5 September 2010. NGR 600-101, paragraph 7-1 states, "the promotion of officers in the ARNG is a function of the State."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001642

    Original file (20120001642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001642 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2), from 2 December 2011 to 6 June 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant's date of rank as a WO1 was 5 June 2009 and he completed WOBC on 20 August 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015444

    Original file (20090015444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) and effective date of promotion as a chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 22 January 2008 to 14 June 2007. The official stated that he met the eligibility criteria for promotion to CW2 on 14 June 2007: He is in an active status and is MOS qualified; he met the 2-year minimum time in grade in the lower grade for promotion to CW2; and he had a valid physical health assessment (PHA), dated 18 March 2007. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004802

    Original file (20080004802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) promotion and Federal Recognition effective date be corrected to reflect 17 December 2007 vice 12 March 2008. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Joint Force Headquarters (JFH), Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) Memorandum, dated 6 March 2008; Promotion Checklist; Unit Memorandum, dated 5 December 2007; Personnel Qualification Record; JFH, TNARNG Orders 338-844, dated 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021250

    Original file (20110021250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of his Federal recognition order for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) from 15 February 2012 to an earlier date. The applicant states: * His promotion packet was submitted in May 2011 after discovery of state procedures which were not being disseminated following his initial date of eligibility, 13 January 2011 * His promotion documents were forwarded to his battalion S-1 upon being informed of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005458

    Original file (20080005458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2, in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2) of this regulation, except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army certification, the following statement will be entered on the record of proceedings (NGB Form 89): "the applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a warrant officer WO1 as provided by NGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003901

    Original file (20070003901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was requested of the Departments of the Army and Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Personnel Division. The evidence shows the applicant was appointed to the rank and pay grade WO1, W-1, on 23 June 2000. Based on this assignment, he became fully eligible for promotion and was promoted to the rank and pay grade, CW2, W-2, with a date of rank and effective date of 16 November 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011992

    Original file (20110011992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2). Section 14308 (f) states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO in the ARNG on 20 September 2008 and he completed the IER Wing Aviator on 25 August 2010.