Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088415C070403
Original file (2003088415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 31 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088415


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Gail J. Wire Chairperson
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member
Mr. Robert Duecaster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests retroactive enrollment in and compensation from the Ready Reserve Mobilization Income Insurance Program (RRMIIP).

3. The applicant states that he received his official briefing regarding the RRMIIP on 12 July 1997 when the 3220th General Support Unit conducted the Safeguard Readiness Posture for the 805th mobilization process. He states that he completed the proper forms and forwarded them through the proper channel. He states that, in cases similar to his, this Board, based on the unit commander stating that there was no official briefing given until 12 July 1997, has approved the cases. He concludes by asking why some of the soldiers received RRMIIP benefits and others did not when all of the soldiers in his unit filled out their applications at the time that the official briefing was held. In support of his application, he submits a copy of a memorandum from the RRMIIP Program Manager dated 16 June 1998; a copy of his RRMIIP enrollment packet dated 12 July 1997; a copy of the orders dated 24 August 1997 ordering him to active duty with a reporting date of 19 August 1997; an undated memorandum addressed to the RRMIIP Program Manager requesting, in effect, the status of this RRMIIP enrollment packet; a copy of a memorandum from his former commander dated 31 July 1998, stating that he was not properly briefed regarding the RRMIIP; copies of memorandums from individuals in his chain of command requesting approval of the RRMIIP enrollment packets from the soldiers in the 805th Military Police (MP) Company; a copy of his Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) releasing him from active duty; and copies of his unit record of Reserve training for the months of October, November and December 1996.

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 21 August 1985, he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for 8 years, in the pay grade of E-3 and he remained in the USAR through a series of reenlistments. During the initial RRMIIP enrollment period he was assigned to the 805th MP Company in Raleigh, North Carolina.

5. On 12 July 1997, the applicant submitted a DD Form 2746 requesting enrollment in the RRMIIP under the $5,000.00 option.

6. The commanding officer forwarded his enrollment pack along with others through his chain of command to the Commander 81st Regional Support Command requesting that the enrollment packets be approved. The commander indicated that the soldiers were told that if an official declination had not been made, they could sign up for the program and since the soldiers had never officially declined the offer, the requests for RRMIIP should be approved.




7. Orders were published on 24 August 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 19 August 1997 for a period not to exceed 270 days. On 20 April 1998, the applicant was released from active duty upon completion of his required service.

8. On 16 June 1998, the RRMIIP Program Manager returned the applicant’s RRMIIP enrollment packet without action for missing the enrollment cutoff date. The Program Manager indicated that if the applicant wished to appeal the decision, he should submit a Memorandum for Record (MFR) through his commander and his chain of command detailing why he was not notified during the initial enrollment period. The Program Manager further indicated that the MFR should be as detailed as possible and indicate when the unit was notified regarding the RRMIIP.

9. On 31 July 1998, the former Commander, 805th MP Company submitted a memorandum (To Whom This May Concern) supporting the applicant’s contentions that he was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP during the initial enrollment period. The commander stated that the program was mentioned to the applicant by another soldier in the 805th MP Company who saw the article in the Soldier’s Magazine and copies were made of the application and passed out to some of the unit members. The commander went on to state that no official explanation of the program was rendered and that the program was not described in a classroom setting. The former commander also submitted a memorandum along with the RRMIIP enrollment packets of the soldiers in his unit through his chain of command, to the Commander, 81st Regional Support, requesting approval of the packets. The commander indicated that the soldiers were told that if an official declination had not been made, they could sign up for the program during this period and since the soldiers had never officially declined the offer approval was requested.

10. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, dated 10 February 1996, authorized the RRMIIP with an initial start date of 1 October 1996. The RRMIIP was designed to provide income insurance for most Reserve Component members who were involuntarily ordered to active duty in support of military operations for over 30 days. The initial enrollment period for active members of the Reserve Components (USAR and National Guard) was 1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996. Personnel who failed to enroll within 60 days after being briefed were considered to have declined. Personnel on active duty were not eligible to apply for enrollment in the RRMIIP. Personnel who enlisted in a Troop Program Unit after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline.

11. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, effective 18 November 1997, terminated the RRMIIP coverage for those not ordered to involuntary active duty as of that date and prohibited new enrollments. Consequently, the USAR and the Army National Guard extended an administrative appeal process to Reserve Component soldiers who believed that they were wrongfully denied an opportunity to enroll. All appeals had to be received in complete form as of 30 June 1998.

12. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense memorandum dated 14 November 1996, provided clarifying guidance regarding eligibility of Reserve members who were insured under the RRMIIP. It states that during the period in which eligible members of the Reserve components who were members prior to the establishment of the RRMIIP are being offered an opportunity to enroll for coverage, such members being called to active duty for a period of covered service prior to having had the opportunity to enroll or decline to be insured under the RRMIIP, will have the option to elect coverage not to exceed the $1,000.00 basic amount.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The issue in this case is whether or not the applicant was properly briefed on the RRMIIP and was it accomplished within the prescribed timeframe. The Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP.

2. His commander for the period covering 1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996 submitted a memorandum requesting that he be allowed the opportunity to enroll in the RRMIIP as the only information that was obtained regarding the RRMIIP was distributed by a fellow soldier who saw an article in the Soldier’s Magazine. The Board has determined that collection of information obtained from the Soldier’s Magazine is not a briefing that would have allowed the applicant to make an informed decision regarding the program.

3. The Board is clear on the fact that he was not properly briefed prior to being mobilized. To deny him the opportunity to enroll in the RRMIIP or to limit the amount of his enrollment would be denying him an opportunity to be afforded the same benefits that other soldiers were afforded.

4. Therefore, the Board accepts the applicant’s contention that he was not briefed on the program and was unjustly denied a benefit that he otherwise would have been able to receive had he been properly and timely briefed. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll him in the RRMIIP under the $5,000.00 option effective 12 July 1997, the date that he submitted his application and, through no fault of his own, was denied.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was enrolled in the RRMIIP effective 12 July 1997 under the $5,000.00 option.

2. That the individual concerned be afforded the opportunity to submit a DFAS-CL Form 1241/3 (RRMIIP Claim for Mobilization Insurance Benefits) and supporting documents for retroactive payment of RRMIIP benefits, minus any premiums he would have paid had he been properly enrolled on 12 July 1997.

BOARD VOTE:

___gw___ ___rd ___ ___kh___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ______Gail J. Wire______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003088415
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003/07/31
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 13 101.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080512C070215

    Original file (2002080512C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application he submits his RRMIIP enrollment packet dated 12 July 1997; a copy of his RRMIIP appeal packet; a copy of orders dated 24 August 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 19 August 1997; a copy of orders dated 9 April 1998, releasing him from active duty effect 18 April 1998; a copy of a memorandum dated 31 July 1998 from the former commander of the 805 th MP Company attesting to the fact that the applicant was not properly briefed regarding the RRMIIP until...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067964C070402

    Original file (2002067964C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of the 805 th Military Police Company Unit Training Schedule for the months of December 1996; a copy of a memorandum dated 15 August 1997, that he submitted through his former commander, to the United States Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) requesting retroactive enrollment in the RRMIIP; a copy of a memorandum from his former commander dated 10 July 1998, requesting that his RRMIIP enrollment application be approved; a copy of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080256C070215

    Original file (2002080256C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an application to this Board dated 22 February 2002, the applicant requested retroactive enrollment in and compensation from the RRMIIP. The initial enrollment period for active members of the Reserve Components (USAR and National Guard) was 1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit was briefed), when a proper briefing should have been conducted and prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081287C070215

    Original file (2002081287C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The supporting memorandum from the applicant’s unit commander is dated 11 December 1997 and confirms that the applicant was not present at the RRMIIP briefing in December 1996. Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed on 8 December 1996 when the unit was briefed on the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076328C070215

    Original file (2002076328C070215.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he originally enrolled in the RRMIIP for the amount of $5,000.00 in coverage; however, by the time he was briefed and enrolled in the RRMIIP he was mobilized and a determination was made at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) that he was eligible for enrollment in the amount of $1,000.00 per month only. In an application to this Board dated 18 December 2001, the applicant requested correction of his records to show that he enrolled in the RRMIIP at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078168C070215

    Original file (2002078168C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of orders dated 9 July 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 18 July 1997; a copy of an Academic Evaluation Report (AER) dated 20 July 1997; copies of e-mail that were sent to the personnel service noncommissioned officer dated 15 September 1997 and 11 October 1997, providing the status of the RRMIIP and indicating that he was only eligible to apply for RRMIIP benefits in the amount of $1,000.00 per month; a copy of his RRMIIP enrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082935C070215

    Original file (2002082935C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 September 2002, the applicant submitted an application to this Board requesting that his records be corrected to show an application for enrollment in the RRMIIP at the $5,000.00 per month option. He states that in December 1996, members of the 111 th ASG received a briefing on the provisions and benefits of the RRMIIP; however, at no time did he receive a briefing nor was he aware of a briefing regarding the RRMIIP until the unit was mobilized. Accordingly, it would be in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071907C070403

    Original file (2002071907C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits orders dated 9 July 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 18 July 1997; a copy of a sworn statement dated 31 October 1997, stating that he missed the RRMIIP briefing because the unit had a Christmas party on 8 December 1996, the same day as the briefing; a copy of a letter from his wife’s employer dated 27 October 1997, stating, in effect, that she was at work on 8 December 1996, from 7:00 am to 12:00 pm; a copy of a memorandum dated 9 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075304C070403

    Original file (2002075304C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director indicated that the applicant’s letter stated that he was not informed of the RRMIIP until he demobilized and a review of his RRMIIP enrollment application shows that he completed the application on 26 August 1997, which was prior to his demobilization date. The Director further stated that the applicant had not submitted any memorandums or supporting documentation as to him not being briefed and that after hearing about the program, he should have obtained more information from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067814C070402

    Original file (2002067814C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed on 8 December 1996 when the unit was briefed on the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, as an exception to policy, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit was briefed), when a proper briefing should have been conducted and was prior to the date he was ordered to active duty...