| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, retroactive enrollment in and compensation from the Ready Reserve Mobilization Income Insurance Program (RRMIIP).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that at the time his unit received the briefing on the RRMIIP, he had been detailed to another location to prepare a Christmas dinner for the unit’s Christmas party and was never offered the opportunity to enroll in the RRMIIP. He further states that by the time he discovered that he was eligible to enroll, he submitted his application for enrollment at the $5,000.00 rate; however, it was only approved at the $1,000.00 rate. In support of his application he submits documents from his chain of command, which attests that he was not briefed on the RRMIIP within the prescribed timeframe.
4. The applicant’s military records show that while serving in the pay grade of E-8 in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG), orders were published on 9 July 1997 which mobilized him effective 18 July 1997, for a period not to exceed 270 days, in support of Operation Joint Guard. He served until he was released from active duty on 7 April 1998. On 22 APRIL 1998, he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).
5. Meanwhile, on 29 October 1997, while deployed to Hungary, he submitted an application for enrollment in the RRMIIP in the amount of $5,000. His chain of command verified that he had not been briefed in December 1996 and recommended that his application be approved. The applicant’s request was approved in the amount of $1,000.00 per month by the National Guard Bureau on 28 January 1998.
6. The statement submitted by the commander in support of the applicant’s request attests to the fact that the applicant was in fact present in a location other than the unit at the time the RRMIIP briefing was conducted, that he was preparing the Christmas meal for the unit’s Christmas party, and that the RRMIIP briefing was conducted only once in that unit and that it was on the 8 December 1996 drill in question. He further opined that the applicant had not been briefed or properly afforded the opportunity to enroll in the RRMIIP.
7. The Board previously approved a case pertaining to a member of the applicant’s unit that was also preparing the unit’s Christmas meal at another location on 8 December 1996 and who was not timely and properly briefed on the RRMIIP. The Board has also approved several other cases involving members of the same unit and has confirmed that the 111th ASG conducted its only RRMIIP briefing on 8 December 1996.
8. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, dated 10 February 1996, authorized the RRMIIP with an initial start date of 1 October 1996. RRMIIP was designed to provide income insurance for most Reserve Component members who were involuntarily ordered to active duty in support of military operations for over 30 days. The initial enrollment period for active members of the Reserve Components (USAR and National Guard) was1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996. Personnel who failed to enroll within 60 days after being briefed were considered to have declined. Personnel on active duty were not eligible to apply for enrollment in the RRMIIP. Personnel who enlisted in a TPU after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline.
9. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, effective 18 November 1997, terminated the RRMIIP coverage for those not ordered to involuntary active duty as of that date and prohibited new enrollments. Consequently, the USAR and Army National Guard extended administrative appeals/errors processing to offer Reserve Component soldiers who believed that they were wrongfully denied enrollment an opportunity to appeal. All appeals had to be received in complete form as of 30 June 1998.
10. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense memorandum dated 14 November 1996, provided clarifying guidance regarding eligibility of Reserve members who were insured under the RRMIIP. It states, in pertinent part, that during the period in which eligible members of the Reserve components who were members prior to the establishment of the RRMIIP who were called to active duty for a period of covered service prior to having an opportunity to enroll or decline to be insured under the RRMIIP, will have the option to elect coverage not to exceed the $1,000.00 basic amount.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The issue in this case is whether or not the applicant was properly briefed on the RRMIIP and was it accomplished within the prescribed timeframe. Given the evidence in this case, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP.
2. Therefore, the Board accepts the applicant’s contention that he was not briefed on the program and was unjustly denied a benefit that he otherwise would have been able to receive had he been properly and timely briefed. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit conducted its only briefing), when a proper briefing should have been conducted and was prior to the date he was ordered to active duty and became ineligible through no fault of his own.
3. As a result, he is entitled to receive RRMIIP benefits at the rate of $5,000.00 per month for the period 18 July 1997 to 7 April 1998, minus the first 30 days, any premiums due from 8 December 1996, and any payments already made.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was enrolled in the RRMIIP, as an exception to policy, effective 8 December 1996 under the $5,000 option, with entitlement to payment at that rate for the period 18 July 1997 to 7 April 1998, minus any premiums he would have paid had he been properly briefed and enrolled on 8 December 1996, minus the first 30 days, and minus any payments already received.
BOARD VOTE:
___gp___ __mm ___ ___tap__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____George D. Paxson____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066429 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/21 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 13 | 101.0000/RRMIIP |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081287C070215
The supporting memorandum from the applicant’s unit commander is dated 11 December 1997 and confirms that the applicant was not present at the RRMIIP briefing in December 1996. Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed on 8 December 1996 when the unit was briefed on the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071907C070403
In support of his application, he submits orders dated 9 July 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 18 July 1997; a copy of a sworn statement dated 31 October 1997, stating that he missed the RRMIIP briefing because the unit had a Christmas party on 8 December 1996, the same day as the briefing; a copy of a letter from his wife’s employer dated 27 October 1997, stating, in effect, that she was at work on 8 December 1996, from 7:00 am to 12:00 pm; a copy of a memorandum dated 9 February...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066301C070402
He also states that his case is very similar to the other soldier’s case, in that he was not afforded the opportunity to be briefed prior to being enrolled and that he should be afforded the benefits that he would have received had he been properly briefed. The initial enrollment period for active members of the Reserve Components (USAR and National Guard) was 1 October 1996 through 31 December 1996. Accordingly, as an exception to policy, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067814C070402
Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed on 8 December 1996 when the unit was briefed on the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, as an exception to policy, it would be in the interest of justice to enroll the applicant in the RRMIIP effective 8 December 1996 (the day the unit was briefed), when a proper briefing should have been conducted and was prior to the date he was ordered to active duty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078168C070215
In support of his application, he submits a copy of orders dated 9 July 1997, ordering him to active duty effective 18 July 1997; a copy of an Academic Evaluation Report (AER) dated 20 July 1997; copies of e-mail that were sent to the personnel service noncommissioned officer dated 15 September 1997 and 11 October 1997, providing the status of the RRMIIP and indicating that he was only eligible to apply for RRMIIP benefits in the amount of $1,000.00 per month; a copy of his RRMIIP enrollment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069412C070402
The applicant states, in effect, that he originally enrolled in the RRMIIP for the amount of $5,000.00 in coverage; however, by the time he was briefed and enrolled in the RRMIIP he was mobilized and a determination was made at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) that the maximum he could be enrolled for was $1,000.00. He also states that his case is very similar to the other soldiers’ cases, in that he was not afforded the opportunity to be briefed prior to being enrolled and that he should be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076328C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he originally enrolled in the RRMIIP for the amount of $5,000.00 in coverage; however, by the time he was briefed and enrolled in the RRMIIP he was mobilized and a determination was made at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) that he was eligible for enrollment in the amount of $1,000.00 per month only. In an application to this Board dated 18 December 2001, the applicant requested correction of his records to show that he enrolled in the RRMIIP at the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082935C070215
On 20 September 2002, the applicant submitted an application to this Board requesting that his records be corrected to show an application for enrollment in the RRMIIP at the $5,000.00 per month option. He states that in December 1996, members of the 111 th ASG received a briefing on the provisions and benefits of the RRMIIP; however, at no time did he receive a briefing nor was he aware of a briefing regarding the RRMIIP until the unit was mobilized. Accordingly, it would be in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075304C070403
The Director indicated that the applicant’s letter stated that he was not informed of the RRMIIP until he demobilized and a review of his RRMIIP enrollment application shows that he completed the application on 26 August 1997, which was prior to his demobilization date. The Director further stated that the applicant had not submitted any memorandums or supporting documentation as to him not being briefed and that after hearing about the program, he should have obtained more information from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074094C070403
Personnel who enlisted in a Troop Program Unit after the initial enrollment period were required to be briefed on the program within 60 days of arrival in the unit and had 60 days after being briefed to enroll or decline. Given the commander’s certification that the applicant was not briefed and that he was deprived an opportunity to make a decision whether or not to enroll in the RRMIIP, the Board is convinced that the applicant was not properly briefed on the RRMIIP. Accordingly, as an...