Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072202C070403
Original file (2002072202C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 23 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002072202

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Ms. Gail J. Wire Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his general discharge should be upgraded because of his mental condition, his incarcerations and his not being counseled as to his rights to appeal for an upgrade of his discharge.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He initially enlisted in the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) on 28 February 1980. He entered initial active duty for training (IADT) on 16 May 1980 and successfully completed his training as a tactical wire operations specialist at Fort Gordon, Georgia. He was honorably released from active duty and was returned to his ILARNG unit on 30 August 1980.

Upon his return, the applicant submitted a request for a conditional release from the ILARNG, due to a change of residence to the State of New York. His release was approved, conditional on his enlisting in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) for the remainder of his service obligation.

He was honorably released from the ILARNG on 12 December 1980 and enlisted in the NYARNG on 13 December 1980 for a period of 5 years, 2 months and 14 days.

The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records show that in February 1981 he stopped attending drills and the commander sent repeated notices of unexcused absences to the applicant via Certified Mail. His records also contain a report of separation (NGB Form 22) showing that he was released under other than honorable conditions from the NYARNG on 30 September 1982, under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, for unsatisfactory participation. He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training), where he remained assigned, until he was discharged under honorable conditions on 27 February 1986, upon completion of his statutory obligation.

The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 4 August 1991. He offered no argument or basis for an upgrade and the ADRB found no basis to upgrade his discharge. The ADRB voted unanimously to deny his application on 30 August 1993. At the time of that board’s denial of his case, the ADRB notified the applicant of the procedures and provided him the forms to apply to this Board.




DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. A review of the available evidence shows that after requesting a transfer from the ILARNG to the NYARNG, the applicant failed to fulfill his service obligation by attending his scheduled training/drills. Accordingly, the Board finds that his service does not warrant a fully honorable discharge for such a short period of actual participation in the Reserve Components.

3. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board and appear to be without merit. The applicant was notified of the procedures for applying to this Board when his application was denied by the ADRB.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___hof __ __gw____ __jlp____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002072202
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/23
TYPE OF DISCHARGE GD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1986/02/27
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR135-178
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 456 144.0301/A03.01
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005581

    Original file (20080005581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the ILARNG for a period of 3 years on 23 May 1980. The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued at the time shows he was discharged on 20 February 1985 under honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010116

    Original file (20060010116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The letter indicated the termination had been initiated at the request of the applicant’s commanding officer because of his voluntary Unsatisfactory Participation (Unauthorized Absences from Inactive Duty Training Assemblies) in the Reserve Components, as required by Army Regulation 135-91. The evidence of record shows the applicant had missed unit drills without being excused from 5 to 6 January 1985 and 19 to 20 January 1985 (4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009246

    Original file (20100009246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his 1981 under other than honorable conditions discharge from the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) to an honorable discharge. On 4 September 1980, he was notified in writing of his unit commander’s intent to separate him from the ILARNG by reason of misconduct, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (ARNG and Army Reserve Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 7, under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002213

    Original file (20110002213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * A summary of benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs dated 13 January 2011 * Orders discharging him from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective 30 September 2003 * A memorandum from the Army Physical Disability Agency, dated 16 September 2003, indicating he was being discharged without severance pay * His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 9 January 2001 * His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005919

    Original file (20130005919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He paid his fines every time he went AWOL and always came back to his unit. He was young and had so many problems while in the Army. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020160

    Original file (20120020160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * Correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980 * Correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" vice "No" 2. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1980 and she was separated from the USAR on 22 December 1980 for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070470C070402

    Original file (2002070470C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that after he completed 2 years of service in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG), on 25 March 1959, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his records within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Consequently, the applicant was entitled to an honorable discharge based on his overall record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007794

    Original file (20090007794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 June 1980, he signed an MNIL Form 135-178-C (Statement of Understanding of Reserve Obligation and Responsibilities) in which he acknowledged that he understood that if he was not excused from scheduled training periods by proper authority, he would be considered absent without leave (AWOL) and would be charged with an unexcused absence. On 14 July 1982, the applicant's commander dispatched a letter to the applicant informing him that he had been declared an unsatisfactory participant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001706

    Original file (20090001706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. The appropriate authority approved his request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. The applicant voluntarily submitted his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and admitted guilt to the charges against him.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013840

    Original file (20110013840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SSN) as "XXX-XX-3413" instead of "XXX-XX-6046." All documents in his available record show his SSN as "XXX-XX-6046."