| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was admitted to the infirmary the night before graduation from basic training for treatment of head and neck injuries.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in San Antonio, Texas, on 14 November 1979, for a period of 3 years, training as a field artillery target acquisition specialist and assignment to the 2nd Armored Division. He was assigned to Fort Sill to undergo his training.
The applicant was treated at the installation hospital at 0225 hours on 7 February 1980 for lacerations over the right eye and chin. He received 12 stitches. A subsequent line of duty investigation revealed that the applicant had entered the barracks while intoxicated and attempted to strike the fire guard. The fire guard defended himself and caused the injury. The investigation concluded that the injury was in the line of duty.
He went absent without leave (AWOL) on 7 February 1980 and remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities in Crosby, Texas, on 4 May 1983. He was returned to military control and charges were preferred against him.
On 15 June 1983, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request, he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He also elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a major general) approved his request on 30 June 1983 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 13 July 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 4 months, and 24 days of total active service and had 1,182 days of lost time due to AWOL.
There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
On 20 June 2000, while incarcerated, the applicant signed an authorization for release of a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214) to officials at the Texas Department of Corrections in connection with his application in Project Rio, a rehabilitation program for inmates.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the length of his absence as well as his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
4. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief considering the seriousness of his offense.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kah___ ___ao___ ___tl____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002072158 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/07/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1983/07/13 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017377C070206
The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record clearly shows that he acknowledged in his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial that he understood that there were no automatic provisions for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011136C070208
His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2 and a forfeiture of pay (both suspended until 9 October 1981, extra duty and restriction for 7 days. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019486
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be changed to an uncharacterized character of service. He was AWOL for more than 60 days and the separation authority determined that his misconduct warranted a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005033
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge. However, on 10 December 1981 the applicant submitted a request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072400C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065840C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or medical discharge. He again went AWOL on 28 July 1975 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Hood on 22 August 1975, where charges were again preferred against him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014116
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The appropriate authority approved her request for discharge on 21 September 1987 and directed her discharge under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, on 3 November 1987, she was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019767
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. On 5 August 1986, the CG approved his request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089597C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010548
On 27 July 1983 after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 26 August 1983, the appropriate authority approved his request for discharge and directed the applicant be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge...