| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Member | |
| Mr. Charles Gainor | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or medical discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That his discharge should be upgraded because of a head injury he received prior to entering the service. He also states that he is willing to serve again if afforded the opportunity.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on 28 June 1974, for a period of 3 years, training as an infantryman and assignment to Fort Hood, Texas. He successfully completed his training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and was transferred to Fort Hood on 3 November 1974. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 6 March 1975.
On 18 April 1975, he went absent without leave (AWOL) and remained absent until he was apprehended by Federal Bureau of Investigation officials in Fort Wayne, Indiana, on 15 July 1975. He was surrendered to the AWOL Apprehension Unit at Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana and was then transferred to the Personnel Control Facility at Fort Knox, Kentucky, where charges were preferred against him.
He again went AWOL on 28 July 1975 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Hood on 22 August 1975, where charges were again preferred against him.
On 28 August 1975, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further elected to submit a statement in his own behalf whereas he asserted, in effect, that he was experiencing family/marital problems and that he was on levy to Germany and had been told that he could not take his wife with him. He felt obligated to protect his wife from his family.
The appropriate authority (a lieutenant general) approved his request and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
Accordingly, he received an undesirable discharge on 3 October 1975, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 11 months and 15 days of total active service and had 113 days of lost time due to AWOL.
He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) in 1976 and 1982, contending that he had turned down a medical discharge for the head injury he received prior to entering the service because he really wanted to stay in. However, because of his personal problems and his low aptitude, he could not handle the pressure. He contended that he should have been given an expeditious or general discharge. The ADRB found no merit to his contentions and denied both of his applications.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate and there never have been any provisions for an automatic upgrade of such a discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted by the Board. However, the Board notes that after being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering the seriousness of the offense, the extensive length of his absence and his rank at the time.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__gp____ __jhl____ ____cg __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001065840 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/25 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1975/10/03 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 689 | 144.7000/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089597C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022821
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022821 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088571C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064347C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or honorable discharge. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063170C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011670
There is no evidence showing the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board requesting a change regarding the reason or character of service of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. However, the individual would normally receive an undesirable discharge from the military service. Moreover, the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's overall quality of service during the period of service under review was not satisfactory.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014985
The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a fully honorable discharge. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070603C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011859
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to honorable. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser-included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive. When authorized, it is issued...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022521
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a discharge under honorable conditions. He also stated that he would continue to go AWOL until he was discharged. However, at the time the applicant was discharged an undesirable discharge was considered appropriate.