| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
21. The Board has received information that there were differences on the method of computation of his IDT (inactive duty training) and ADT (active duty training) points which caused different figures to be used in his records. He requests that his records be corrected to match the figures as complied by Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).
22. The calculations as noted on the applicant's NGB Form 23 (National Guard Retirement Points History Statement) shows 27 IDT and 16 ADT retirement points for retirement year 1996-1997.
23. The 13 February 2002 letter from DFAS, to the applicant, indicates that in their calculations of the correct number of days are 23 IDT days and 32 ADT days.
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
9. It was the intent of the Board's prior actions to afford the applicant as full and equitable restitution of both his participation and retirement calculations as possible. Due to differences in the method of calculation and interpretation of the Board's intent there is a difference in the final tabulation of the applicant's IDT and ADT points between the retirement center and DFAS.
10. As the Board did not specify the number of points for this specific year, it finds that the method of calculation used by DFAS is more in accordance with its intent. As such, it is appropriate to correct the applicant's records to be consistent with the DFAS calculations and payment.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation 1 by adding:
d. by showing that for retirement year 1996-1997 the applicant earned 23 inactive duty points and 32 active duty points.
BOARD VOTE:
__JLP___ __HOF__ __GJW__ AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Jennifer L. Prater__
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2002071788 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020723 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 135.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
In view of the ADB’s finding that he did not communicate a threat to a coworker and should be returned to a participating status, we believe corrective action in regard to his request for point credit from 1997 to 2002 is appropriate. Until such time as the ADB determined that he had not communicated a threat to a coworker, there existed no basis for the commander to determine that he should be returned to a participating status, especially considering the racial incident one year earlier...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011521C070208
The applicant states his retired pay was calculated based on 2325 points instead of the correct 2550 points. An NGB Form 23 (Retirement Credits Record) reveals the applicant earned 2200 retirement points through 1 March 1973. c. A Retirement Points Accounting System (RPAS) Summary Points Inquiry, dated 8 March 2005, shows that the applicant had 1805 retirement points from 24 February 1953 through 23 February 1968. A review of the three available retirement points documents in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012849
This service equals 3 years, 9 months, and 18 days; b. service in the USNR Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) from 31 August 1956 through 17 September 1959 (not qualifying years for retirement); c. active service in the USAF from 19 September 1956 through 15 February 1963 (3 years, 4 months, and 29 days of active duty); d. a break in service from 16 February 1963 through 15 November 1966. (4 years, 5 months, and 5 days); i. USNR service from 14 April 1973 through 1 April 1976 (2 years, 11...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01513
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01513 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that the additional nonpaid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points initially approved by the Board be changed to paid IDT points. The applicant’s complete...
CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2010-040
• • • On April 24, 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve. of the Pay Manual, COMDTINST M7220.29B, states that creditable service for pay purposes includes “all periods of active duty inactive service … in any Regular or Reserve component.” However, Chapter 2.B.4.a. However, the 1995 RATMAN defines an “anniversary year” as extending “from the date of entry or reen- try to the day preceding the anniversary of entry or reentry” and the 1997 RPM states that a reservist’s...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-220
This final decision, dated June 12, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a chief health services specialist who was medically retired from the Reserve on April 5, 1997, with a 30% disability rating for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), asked the Board to correct her time in service, awards, and Reserve drill points for her inactive duty training (IDT (paid drills)), active duty training (ADT), special active duty training...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069736C070402
A 1989 USAR Standby Advisory Board reviewed his record and selected him for promotion to MAJ. A 1989 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Proceedings directed that his discharge be voided, that he be promoted to MAJ, that he be credited with qualifying service for Reserve retirement, and that an explanation be placed in his records to show that the resulting gap in Officer Evaluation Reports (OERs) was due to no fault of the officer. On 18 October 1988, ARPERCEN issued...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053035C070420
The applicant requests, in effect, that his retirement point account be corrected to show that he has 20 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60 and that he be provided retired pay. The applicant states, in effect, that he is credited with only 18 years qualifying for retired pay, but he served for 20 qualifying years. His retirement point account should then show a total of 19 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089516C070403
The applicant states that he should be reinstated in an active status, retroactive to 4 March 2002, issued orders awarding retirement points for his language training by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), as detailed on his DA Form 1380s (Record of Individual Performance of Reserve Duty Training), and promotion to colonel. The 99 th RST stated that the applicant was discharged for failing to earn 50 points in a retirement year as required by regulation. Army Regulation...
The other letter the applicant submitted is from an IMA who claims to have also received misguided information when she entered the IMA program. If the Board rules in favor of the applicant, the Board would have to award the applicant 4 non-paid inactive duty training (IDT) points for Retention Year Ending (RYE) 22 April 1996 and 8 non-paid IDT points for RYE 22 April 1997. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.