Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070898C070402
Original file (2002070898C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002070898

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Chairperson
Mr. Arthur O. Omartian Member
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank of staff sergeant (SSG).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that at the time of his discharge from the Army he held the rank of SSG and not sergeant (SGT). In support of his application, he submits a copy of his Certification of Military Service (NA Form 13038), dated 16 March 1998, published by the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), St. Louis, Missouri.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of NA Form 13038, dated
16 March 1998, published by the NPRC, NARA.

The NA Form 13038 confirmed that the applicant entered the Regular Army on
6 January 1951, and that he continuously served on active duty until being honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 10 December 1952. This document also verifies that on the date of his REFRAD, the applicant held the rank of SGT. The authority and reason for his discharge and other information in regard to the facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge or separation processing are not contained in this form or on file.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the separation documents. It states, in effect, that the active duty grade of rank at the time of separation will be entered on the separation document.

Army Regulation 15-185, provides the regulation that governs the operation of the Board, sets forth the procedures for processing requests to correct military records states, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity and the burden of proving error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence rests with the applicant.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the contention of the applicant that his rank at the time of his separation is incorrect and should be corrected to read the rank of SSG, however, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.


2. In accordance with regulatory guidance, the active duty grade of rank at the time of separation will be entered on the separation document. The only separation document available to the Board was the NA Form 13038, which indicated that the applicant held the rank of SGT on the date of his separation, and that Board presumes government regularity in the preparation of this document. Therefore, lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board is compelled to deny the requested relief.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KAK__ __AOA__ __RJW__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002070898
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/07/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 131.0900
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066269C070421

    Original file (2001066269C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070855C070402

    Original file (2002070855C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense with which he was charged. The evidence of record does confirm that the applicant ultimately received a BCD, as indicated in the court-martial record, and that his separation document incorrectly lists the type of discharge as a DD. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062572C070421

    Original file (2001062572C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) or a fully honorable discharge (HD). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074092C070403

    Original file (2002074092C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080277C070215

    Original file (2002080277C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was serving in the Army on the dates entered in Item 41 of the DD Form 214 in question. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of his NA Form 13038, dated 19 March 1996, and his DD Form 214, dated 11 April 1955. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by deleting the entry “From 1950 - To 1953“ currently contained in Item 41 (Dates of Last Civilian Employment) of the DD Form 214 of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069610C070402

    Original file (2002069610C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be compensated for the money lost due to his reduction in rank for misconduct. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065015C070421

    Original file (2001065015C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He states that he was separated from the Army on partial records and that the date of his discharge listed on his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) is incorrect. The WD Form 372A also verifies the applicant’s discharge date was 2 December 1946.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068221C070402

    Original file (2002068221C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065655C070421

    Original file (2001065655C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019236

    Original file (20080019236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect, he has several documents that show his rank as 1LT and would like his record corrected to show he held that rank upon his separation. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.