| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) or a fully honorable discharge (HD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that his UD should be upgraded to an HD based upon his combat service. He claims he served in combat with the 187th Airborne Infantry Regiment in Korea from 1950 to 1953. He also claims that at the conclusion of his tour in Korea he was treated for combat fatigue on a hospital ship and that this condition caught up with him when he was subsequently serving in Germany. He claims to hold 12 service ribbons and numerous other awards that include the Combat Infantryman Badge. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his Certification of Military Service
(NA Form 13038) and an HD certificate from the United States Navy (USN).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire in 1973. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of a Certification of Military Service (NA Form 13038), dated 31 May 2001, published by the NPRC, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
The applicant provides a copy of an HD certificate, dated 10 February 1946, which shows that he was honorably discharged from the USN on that date, in the rank of torpedoman’s mate third class. There were no other records made available from this period of prior service.
A discharge packet, containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge from the Army, was not available to the Board for review. However, there was a copy of a NA Form 13038 on file, dated 31 May 2001, which verified the applicant’s military service in the Army.
The NA Form 13038 confirmed that the applicant entered the Regular Army on 21 March 1950, and that he continuously served on active duty until 31 August 1954, at which time he was undesirably discharged, in the rank of private. This document does not provide the authority and reason for his discharge or any other information in regard to the facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge or separation processing.
Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation that governs the operation of the Board, sets forth the procedures for processing requests to correct military records. Paragraph 2-9 states, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity and the burden of proving error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence rests with the applicant.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the contentions of the applicant that his discharge should be upgraded based on his combat service and because combat fatigue was a mitigating factor for his misconduct. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support these claims.
2. By regulation, the applicant must prove error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. Because his records were lost or destroyed in the fire at the NPRC, the applicant’s record is void of facts and circumstances concerning events that led to a discharge from the Army. Therefore, lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is compelled to presume government regularity in the discharge process and it finds there is insufficient evidence to support the requested relief in this case.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ _ _EJA__ ___RKS_ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062572 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/31 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074092C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066269C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070898C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 15-185, provides the regulation that governs the operation of the Board, sets forth the procedures for processing requests to correct military records states, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity and the burden of proving error or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080277C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was serving in the Army on the dates entered in Item 41 of the DD Form 214 in question. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of his NA Form 13038, dated 19 March 1996, and his DD Form 214, dated 11 April 1955. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by deleting the entry “From 1950 - To 1953“ currently contained in Item 41 (Dates of Last Civilian Employment) of the DD Form 214 of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065655C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012295C071029
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice that occurred on 14 October 1959, the date of his discharge. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069610C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be compensated for the money lost due to his reduction in rank for misconduct. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011574C070208
The NA Form 13038 issued by the NPRC shows that the applicant was a member of the Regular Army, from 27 November 1950 to 27 August 1952, his Service was terminated by Honorable Discharge, and the last rank he held was Private First Class. There is no evidence in the available service records which shows the applicant held the rank of corporal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected and an appropriate document be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065015C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He states that he was separated from the Army on partial records and that the date of his discharge listed on his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) is incorrect. The WD Form 372A also verifies the applicant’s discharge date was 2 December 1946.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001895C070208
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. This document further shows the disposition of the applicant was disability discharge under section II, Army Regulation 615-360. The evidence includes a WD AGO Form 53-55 that contains an entry in Item 34 that indicates the applicant was never wounded/injured as a result of combat action.