| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. JoAnn H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Member | |
| Mr. Terry L. Placek | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be compensated for the money lost due to his reduction in rank for misconduct.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was punished for the acts of misconduct of another, in an attempt to follow orders. He states that the punishment he received was an injustice and feels he should be compensated for the anxiety he now suffers. In support of his application, he submits the following documents: Special Orders 138 dated 12 December 1942, issued by Headquarters, 53rd Signal Battalion; Honorable Discharge Certificate; Meritorious Service Unit Citation; one Letter of Commendation; orders for the Army Commendation Medal; award recommendation for the Bronze Star Medal; General Orders 125, Headquarters, Mediterranean Theater of Operations, dated 6 November 1944; and a newspaper article from the Cox New Service.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in a fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire in 1973. The information herein was gleaned from a copy of a Certification of Military Service (NA Form 13038), dated 31 January 2001, published by the NPRC, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
The NA Form 13038 confirmed that the applicant entered the Regular Army on
5 March 1941, and that he continuously served on active duty until 14 September 1945, at which time he was honorably discharged in the rank of technical sergeant.
Special Orders 138, dated 12 December 1942, issued by Headquarters, 53rd Signal Battalion provided by the applicant, confirms he was reduced from the rank of staff sergeant to the rank of private. In addition, the applicant’s reduction was for misconduct as the noncommissioned office in charge, who allowed a soldier to operate a government vehicle in excess of authorized speed.
Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation that governs the operation of the Board, sets forth the procedures for processing requests to correct military records. Paragraph 2-9 states, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity and the burden of proving error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence rests with the applicant.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the contentions of the applicant that he should be compensated for the anxiety that he now suffers due to his reduction for misconduct, but finds this claim lacks merit.
2. By regulation, the applicant must prove error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced to the rank of private for misconduct. Because his records were lost or destroyed in the fire at the NPRC, the applicant’s record is void of facts and circumstances concerning events that led to his reduction. Therefore, lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is compelled to presume government regularity in that the applicant’s reduction to private for misconduct, was accomplished in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and it finds there is insufficient evidence to support the requested relief in this case.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JHL JNS TLP DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002069610 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/05/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 133.0100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070855C070402
However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense with which he was charged. The evidence of record does confirm that the applicant ultimately received a BCD, as indicated in the court-martial record, and that his separation document incorrectly lists the type of discharge as a DD. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011574C070208
The NA Form 13038 issued by the NPRC shows that the applicant was a member of the Regular Army, from 27 November 1950 to 27 August 1952, his Service was terminated by Honorable Discharge, and the last rank he held was Private First Class. There is no evidence in the available service records which shows the applicant held the rank of corporal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected and an appropriate document be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068221C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: However, in this case, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003627C071029
Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's standard name line in these orders listed his rank as PFC, and his NPRC file is void of any orders or other documents that show he was promoted to CPL by proper authority prior to his REFRAD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062572C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) or a fully honorable discharge (HD). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066269C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074092C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019611
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. This case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consists of the NA Form 13038 and DD Form 256A provided by the applicant and a DA Form 2139 (Military Pay Voucher) in the applicant's NPRC file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016272C080407
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request that his record be corrected to show he was a second lieutenant (2LT) while serving on active duty. Although the individual providing the statement indicates the applicant was serving on active duty during the Korean Conflict, that the applicant earned the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal; and that he was scheduled to be promoted to 2LT; there is no documentary evidence...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050000816C070206
Member Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 6 January 2005; an undated application for Promotion Back Pay for Navy, Marine Corps POWs during World War II; copies of her husband's Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, effective 27 April 1946; Certificate of Death, issued 31 December 1997; Marriage Certificate,...