| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by removing numerous orders in his records concerning his first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCM).
3. The applicant states that there are too many errors in his records concerning his award of the GCM.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was awarded the GCM on Orders 049-00027, dated 18 February 1993, for the period of 1 August 1989 to 31 July 1989, however the ending date of the period for the award should have read 31 July 1992, and not 31 July 1989. This error was corrected on Orders
05-00067, dated 19 February 1993, which amended the original 18 February 1993 order to read “Date(s) or Period of Service: 1 Aug 89 thru 31 Jul 92.”
5. Orders 055-00042, dated 24 February 1993, amended Orders 049-00027, dated 18 February 1993, to show the period of service for the award as 1 Aug 89 thru 31 Aug 92. The ending date for the period of the award was incorrect on these orders and that order was revoked by Orders 089-00102, dated 30 March 1993.
6. Orders 089-00103, dated 30 March 1993, awarded the applicant the GCM for the period 1 Aug 89 thru 31 Jul 92, which were the correct dates, however, this order was later revoked on 30 June 1993, by Orders 181-00115.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Evidence shows that there were numerous orders published, revoked and amended in an attempt to correct the ending date of the period covered for the applicant’s first award of the GCM. However, many of these attempts only compounded the problem by making additional errors.
2. The array of GCM orders, revocations and amendments in the applicant’s records is confusing and could cause an injustice to the applicant when trying to determine the status of this award. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the following orders should be removed from his records: Orders 055-00042, dated
24 February 1993, Orders 089-00102, dated 30 March 1993, Orders 089-00103, dated 30 March 1993, and Orders 181-00115, dated 30 June 1993.
3. The original Orders 049-00027, dated 18 February 1993, and the subsequent amendment of those orders, by Orders 05-00067 dated 19 February 1993, should remain in the applicant’s records, and corrects the typographical error made of the original orders and shows the correct ending date of the period covered by the award of 31 Jul 92.
4. In view of the foregoing, and in the interest of justice the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by removing the following orders from the applicant’s records: Orders 055-00042, dated 24 February 1993, Orders 089-00102, dated 30 March 1993, Orders 089-00103, dated 30 March 1993, and Orders 181-00115, dated 30 June 1993.
BOARD VOTE:
__KAN_ _ ___GJW_ __PHM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Kathleen A. Newman___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002070553 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030123 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00042
Member had one Article 15 for making a false official statement to civilian law enforcement officers about his car where he reported it stolen while he knew he had arranged for its disposal, one Article 15 for dereliction of duty for negligently failing to deliver priority work and LOGAIR in a timely manner as required, one Letter of Reprimand and a security violation for leaving classified cargo unattended without proper security measures, and one Record of Individual Counseling for running...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000835
The applicant requests correction of his records to show 19 March 2009 as his Federal recognition date for the rank of second lieutenant (2LT); promotion to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT), effective 19 September 2010; and any back pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections. The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request to adjust his initial appointment date to the rank of 2LT to 19 March 2009 based on the facts that: a. his Federal Recognition...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012833C070206
LaVerne Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that the first award certificate, reflecting Permanent Orders Number 066-1, dated 6 March 2000, for the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for meritorious service during the period 7 June 1997 to 29 June 2000 filed in the Commendatory Data section on his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be expunged. As a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 4 Aug 07. According to information provided by the applicant, special order P-049, dated 4 Aug 07, the applicant was promoted to the grade of...
HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1997C Lieutenant Colonel Board, with the Meritorious Service Medal (First Leaf Cluster) (MSM(1OLC)) for the period 16 March O a k 1993-28 February 1995, included in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) . After careful consideration of the applicant‘s complete submission, we believe some doubt exists as to whether...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Master Records Management Division, ARPC/DSMO, reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating that, although the applicant has provided favorable communications from individuals not in his rating chain for the OPRs in question, they are not convinced by the evidence provided, that these reports do not accurately portray applicant's duty performance and should be removed from his record. If the Board disagrees, they recommended removal of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017783
The applicant requests the removal of erroneous orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal and their subsequent revocation orders from his official military personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states that the correct set of orders are also in his OMPF and removal of the erroneous orders will allow for easier review by the Sergeant First Class Promotion Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013028
On 20 February 2014, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge action and directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. (2) item 14, all formal, in-service (full time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214 of at least 1 week or 40 hours duration. The evidence of record shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020225
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * MSM award certificate with permanent order number * Permanent Orders 049-04, dated 18 February 2009 * Extract of recently approved unit awards from the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human...
By letter of amendment, dated 1 July 1994, applicant requested that the Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs) closing 2 August 1975, 29 February 1976, and 28 February 1977, be removed from his records and that he be given consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board. We found no basis to recommend that applicant be reconsidered for promotion based on the issues cited in his requests pertaining to the OERs closing 2 August 1975 and 29 February...